AHRQ EPC Series on Improving Translation of Evidence: Web-Based Interactive Presentation of Systematic Review Reports.
Evidence-Based Practice
/ organization & administration
Humans
Internet
Network Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews as Topic
Translational Research, Biomedical
/ organization & administration
United States
United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Urinary Incontinence
/ psychology
Women's Health
Journal
Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety
ISSN: 1938-131X
Titre abrégé: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101238023
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
25
02
2019
revised:
24
04
2019
accepted:
07
05
2019
entrez:
7
9
2019
pubmed:
7
9
2019
medline:
31
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Systematic reviews are used by a diverse range of users to address an ever-expanding set of questions and needs. It is unlikely that a single static report will efficiently satisfy the different needs of diverse users. An open-source Web-based interactive report presentation of a systematic review was developed to allow users to generate their own "reports" from the information produced by the review. Data from a broad-scope systematic review were used with network meta-analysis conducted on nonsurgical treatments of urinary incontinence (UI) in women. Stakeholders informed and piloted the tool and assessed its usefulness. The final tool allows users to obtain descriptive and analytic results for a network of treatment categories and various outcomes (cure, improvement, satisfaction, quality of life, adverse events) across several subgroups (all women, older women, or those with stress or urgency UI), along with study-level information, and overall conclusions. The stakeholders were satisfied with the functionality of the tool and proposed a number of improvements regarding presentation (for example, present information on numbers of trials in figures), analyses (for example, allow on-the-fly subgroup analyses, explore trade-offs between several outcomes), and information sharing (for example, provide ability to import/export data from/to other software). A prototype tool to present customized analyses from broad-scope systematic reviews is presented. Further improvements are suggested to develop a scalable tool to make systematic reviews useful to increasingly diverse user groups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31488251
pii: S1553-7250(19)30090-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.05.001
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
629-638Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Joint Commission. All rights reserved.