Centering in Multiple Regression Does Not Always Reduce Multicollinearity: How to Tell When Your Estimates Will Not Benefit From Centering.

interaction linear model moderated regression multicollinearity

Journal

Educational and psychological measurement
ISSN: 1552-3888
Titre abrégé: Educ Psychol Meas
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372767

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Historique:
entrez: 7 9 2019
pubmed: 7 9 2019
medline: 7 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Within the context of moderated multiple regression, mean centering is recommended both to simplify the interpretation of the coefficients and to reduce the problem of multicollinearity. For almost 30 years, theoreticians and applied researchers have advocated for centering as an effective way to reduce the correlation between variables and thus produce more stable estimates of regression coefficients. By reviewing the theory on which this recommendation is based, this article presents three new findings. First, that the original assumption of expectation-independence among predictors on which this recommendation is based can be expanded to encompass many other joint distributions. Second, that for many jointly distributed random variables, even some that enjoy considerable symmetry, the correlation between the centered main effects and their respective interaction can increase when compared with the correlation of the uncentered effects. Third, that the higher order moments of the joint distribution play as much of a role as lower order moments such that the symmetry of lower dimensional marginals is a necessary but not sufficient condition for a decrease in correlation between centered main effects and their interaction. Theoretical and simulation results are presented to help conceptualize the issues.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31488914
doi: 10.1177/0013164418817801
pii: 10.1177_0013164418817801
pmc: PMC6713984
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

813-826

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004;13(3):141-51
pubmed: 15297898
J Pers. 1991 Jun;59(2):143-78
pubmed: 1880698
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1308-1317
pubmed: 26148824
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Jul;47(4):547-65
pubmed: 26777669
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
pubmed: 3806354

Auteurs

Oscar L Olvera Astivia (OL)

The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Edward Kroc (E)

The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Classifications MeSH