The effect on morbidity of the use of prophylactic abdominal drain following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Abdominal drain Cholecystectomy Laparoscopy

Journal

Pakistan journal of medical sciences
ISSN: 1682-024X
Titre abrégé: Pak J Med Sci
Pays: Pakistan
ID NLM: 100913117

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez: 7 9 2019
pubmed: 7 9 2019
medline: 7 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate the clinical role of the routine use of a drain in an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy operation applied to patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis not showing acute inflammation. Following laparoscopic removal of the gallbladder, patients were separated into two groups of 30 each, either with subhepatic drain placement or without. The presence of subhepatic fluid collection was evaluated with transabdominal ultrasonography (USG) at 24 hours postoperatively and on the 7th day. The other parameters evaluated were postoperative morbidity, shoulder and abdominal pain. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in respect of demographic characteristics and operative details. The median pain score was determined to be statistically significantly higher in the group with a drain applied compared to the group without a drain (p=0.007). In the comparison between the groups of fluid collection on USG at 24 hours and shoulder pain persisting until the 7th day, although seen less in the group with no drain applied, no statistically significant difference was determined (p=0.065, p=0.159). In the examinations made on the 7th day, no hematoma or significant fluid collection was determined on USG and no wound infection was observed in any patient of either group. The routine application of prophylactic subhepatic drain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure did not show any benefit to the patient.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the clinical role of the routine use of a drain in an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy operation applied to patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis not showing acute inflammation.
METHOD METHODS
Following laparoscopic removal of the gallbladder, patients were separated into two groups of 30 each, either with subhepatic drain placement or without. The presence of subhepatic fluid collection was evaluated with transabdominal ultrasonography (USG) at 24 hours postoperatively and on the 7th day. The other parameters evaluated were postoperative morbidity, shoulder and abdominal pain.
RESULTS RESULTS
No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in respect of demographic characteristics and operative details. The median pain score was determined to be statistically significantly higher in the group with a drain applied compared to the group without a drain (p=0.007). In the comparison between the groups of fluid collection on USG at 24 hours and shoulder pain persisting until the 7th day, although seen less in the group with no drain applied, no statistically significant difference was determined (p=0.065, p=0.159). In the examinations made on the 7th day, no hematoma or significant fluid collection was determined on USG and no wound infection was observed in any patient of either group.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The routine application of prophylactic subhepatic drain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure did not show any benefit to the patient.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31488997
doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.5.291
pii: PJMS-35-1306
pmc: PMC6717480
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1306-1311

Références

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Nov;82(6):408-10
pubmed: 11103159
Surg Endosc. 2003 Apr;17(4):533-8
pubmed: 12582754
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2003 Apr;388(2):95-100
pubmed: 12684804
Ann Surg. 2004 Dec;240(6):1074-84; discussion 1084-5
pubmed: 15570212
Surgery. 1991 Jun;109(6):740-6
pubmed: 2042093
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Mar;21(2):119-23
pubmed: 21247302
Dig Endosc. 2011 Apr;23(2):153-6
pubmed: 21429021
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2011;22(2):183-9
pubmed: 21796556
J Minim Access Surg. 2012 Jul;8(3):90-2
pubmed: 22837596
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 May;18(5):941-6
pubmed: 24435456
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Nov;21(11):787-94
pubmed: 24942497
JSLS. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4):null
pubmed: 25516708
Int J Surg. 2015 Nov;23(Pt A):87-96
pubmed: 26386402
Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 2):288-92
pubmed: 26730011
Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):358-368
pubmed: 27871803
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Dec;10(12):PC03-PC05
pubmed: 28208922
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 2;2018:8436749
pubmed: 30065946
Pak J Med Sci. 2019 Jan-Feb;35(1):226-229
pubmed: 30881428
Br J Radiol. 1994 May;67(797):429-30
pubmed: 8193886
Am J Surg. 1976 Sep;132(3):418-21
pubmed: 962023

Auteurs

Mustafa Taner Bostanci (MT)

Mustafa Taner Bostanci, Department of General Surgery, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Mehmet Saydam (M)

Mehmet Saydam, Department of General Surgery, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Koray Kosmaz (K)

Koray Kosmaz, Department of General Surgery, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Baki Tastan (B)

Baki Tastan, Department of General Surgery, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.

Erdal Birol Bostanci (EB)

Erdal Birol Bostanci, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Musa Akoglu (M)

Musa Akoglu, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH