Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Biomechanical Comparison of Superior Capsuloligamentous Complex Reconstruction Techniques and an Interpositional Graft Technique.
biomechanics
capsule reconstruction
interposition
irreparable rotator cuff tears
superior glenohumeral stability
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
entrez:
7
9
2019
pubmed:
7
9
2019
medline:
7
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Irreparable rotator cuff tears lead to superior translation of the humeral head. Numerous surgical management options are available to treat the condition. To compare superior capsule stability among different types of patch grafting in irreparable rotator cuff tears. Six cadaveric shoulders were tested in a custom-designed shoulder testing system. Superior translation of the humerus and subacromial contact pressure were quantified in an intact condition (condition 1), after cutting the supraspinatus tendon (condition 2), and after additionally cutting the superior capsuloligamentous complex (condition 3). The results were compared among 3 types of patch grafting, in which capsule reconstruction was achieved by glenoidal 3-point (condition 4) or 2-point (condition 5) fixation or by affixing a graft below the acromion (condition 6). No significant difference in subacromial pressure was measured by reconstruction with 2 or 3 anchors compared with conditions 1 and 2 ( The superior capsuloligamentous complex plays an important role in stabilizing the glenohumeral joint. The results suggest that with additional medial anchoring at the coracoid base, the depressing and centering effect of the superior complex can probably be regained in a more physiological way compared with a reconstructed capsule with 2 glenoid attachments or with an interpositional graft below the acromion.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Irreparable rotator cuff tears lead to superior translation of the humeral head. Numerous surgical management options are available to treat the condition.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
To compare superior capsule stability among different types of patch grafting in irreparable rotator cuff tears.
METHODS
METHODS
Six cadaveric shoulders were tested in a custom-designed shoulder testing system. Superior translation of the humerus and subacromial contact pressure were quantified in an intact condition (condition 1), after cutting the supraspinatus tendon (condition 2), and after additionally cutting the superior capsuloligamentous complex (condition 3). The results were compared among 3 types of patch grafting, in which capsule reconstruction was achieved by glenoidal 3-point (condition 4) or 2-point (condition 5) fixation or by affixing a graft below the acromion (condition 6).
RESULTS
RESULTS
No significant difference in subacromial pressure was measured by reconstruction with 2 or 3 anchors compared with conditions 1 and 2 (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The superior capsuloligamentous complex plays an important role in stabilizing the glenohumeral joint. The results suggest that with additional medial anchoring at the coracoid base, the depressing and centering effect of the superior complex can probably be regained in a more physiological way compared with a reconstructed capsule with 2 glenoid attachments or with an interpositional graft below the acromion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31489328
doi: 10.1177/2325967119864590
pii: 10.1177_2325967119864590
pmc: PMC6709439
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2325967119864590Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Références
Am J Sports Med. 2000 Mar-Apr;28(2):200-5
pubmed: 10750996
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 Jan-Feb;10(1):68-72
pubmed: 11182739
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Nov-Dec;16(6):821-36
pubmed: 17936022
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Aug 4;92(9):1894-908
pubmed: 20686065
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2248-55
pubmed: 22886689
Arthroscopy. 2013 Mar;29(3):459-70
pubmed: 23369443
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 May;23(5):642-8
pubmed: 24388150
Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec;31(12):2472-80
pubmed: 26364549
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1423-30
pubmed: 26944572
Arthrosc Tech. 2015 Dec 23;4(6):e833-9
pubmed: 27284520
Open Orthop J. 2016 Jul 21;10:315-323
pubmed: 27708733
Arthroscopy. 2017 Mar;33(3):673-680
pubmed: 27956233
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jan;137(1):95-103
pubmed: 27957596
Arthroscopy. 2017 Sep;33(9):1639-1644
pubmed: 28602388
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Sep;26(9):e265-e277
pubmed: 28684233
Obere Extrem. 2017;12(1):38-45
pubmed: 28868086
Acta Biomed. 2017 Oct 18;88(4S):75-80
pubmed: 29083357
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Dec;26(12):2158-2166
pubmed: 29146012
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jan;34(1):93-99
pubmed: 29146165
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Apr;(289):144-55
pubmed: 8472405