Stem cell injections for axial back pain: a systematic review of associated risks and complications with a case illustration of diffuse hyperplastic gliosis resulting in cauda equina syndrome.
MSC = mesenchymal stem cell
ODI = Oswestry Disability Index
PRISMA = Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
UTSW = University of Texas Southwestern
VAS = visual analog scale
allogeneic stem cells
back pain
cauda equina syndrome
disability in the United States
global disability
lumbar
stem cell complications
stem cell injection
Journal
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
ISSN: 1547-5646
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Spine
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101223545
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Sep 2019
06 Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
16
05
2019
accepted:
17
06
2019
entrez:
7
9
2019
pubmed:
7
9
2019
medline:
7
9
2019
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Axial low-back pain is a disease of epidemic proportions that exerts a heavy global toll on the active workforce and results in more than half a trillion dollars in annual costs. Stem cell injections are being increasingly advertised as a restorative solution for various degenerative diseases and are becoming more affordable and attainable by the public. There have been multiple reports in the media of these injections being easily available abroad outside of clinical trials, but scientific evidence supporting them remains scarce. The authors present a case of a serious complication after a stem cell injection for back pain and provide a systematic review of the literature of the efficacy of this treatment as well as the associated risks and complications. A systematic review of the literature was performed using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus online electronic databases to identify articles reporting stem cell injections for axial back pain in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The primary focus was on outcomes and complications. A case of glial hyperplasia of the roots of the cauda equina directly related to stem cell injections performed abroad is also reported. The authors identified 14 publications (including a total of 147 patients) that met the search criteria. Three of the articles presented data for the same patient population with different durations of follow-up and were thus analyzed as a single study, reducing the total number of studies to 12. In these 12 studies, follow-up periods ranged from 6 months to 6 years, with 50% having a follow-up period of 1 year or less. Most studies reported favorable outcomes, although 36% used subjective measures. There was a tendency for pain relief to wane after 6 months to 2 years, with patients seeking a surgical solution. Only 1 study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT). There are still insufficient data to support stem cell injections for back pain. Additional RCTs with long-term follow-up are necessary before statements can be made regarding the efficacy and safety.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31491761
doi: 10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19594
pii: 2019.6.SPINE19594
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM