Differential survival of 3rd stage larvae of Contracaecum rudolphii type B infecting common bream (Abramis brama) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio).
Bream
Carp
Nematodes
Resistance
Susceptibility
Journal
Parasitology research
ISSN: 1432-1955
Titre abrégé: Parasitol Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8703571
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
11
09
2018
accepted:
23
08
2019
pubmed:
8
9
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
8
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The main fish host reaction to an infection with third stage anisakid nematode larvae is a response in which host immune cells (macrophages, granulocytes, lymphocytes) in affected internal organs initially are attracted to the parasite whereafter fibroblasts may enclose the parasite forming granuloma. Generally, the reaction is non-lethal to the parasite which may survive for years in the fish host retaining infectivity to the final host. This may also apply for the anisakid nematode Contracaecum rudolphii (having the adult stage in cormorants, using copepods as first intermediate/paratenic host and zooplankton feeding fish as paratenic hosts). The present study has shown that most Contracaecum rudolphii larvae survive in bream (Abramis brama) (from Lake Balaton, Hungary) whereas the majority of the nematode larvae die in Cyprinus carpio (from Lake Hévíz, directly connected to Lake Balaton). Both cyprinid host species interacted with the nematode larvae through establishing a marked cellular encapsulation around them but with different effects. The differential survival in common carp and bream may theoretically be explained by ecological factors, such as the environmental temperature which either directly or indirectly affect the development of nematode larvae, and/or intrinsic host factors, such as differential immune responses and host genetics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31493065
doi: 10.1007/s00436-019-06441-4
pii: 10.1007/s00436-019-06441-4
pmc: PMC6754354
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2811-2817Références
Wiad Parazytol. 2008;54(4):339-43
pubmed: 19338227
Parasitol Int. 2008 Dec;57(4):437-40
pubmed: 18571974
Adv Parasitol. 2008;66:47-148
pubmed: 18486689
Int J Food Microbiol. 2016 Jun 16;227:13-6
pubmed: 27043384
J Helminthol. 2018 Jan;92(1):81-89
pubmed: 28124629
J Parasitol. 2007 Aug;93(4):961-4
pubmed: 17918390
Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2009 Sep;56(3):185-93
pubmed: 19827362
Acta Vet Hung. 1995;43(4):401-22
pubmed: 8882739
Mol Cell Probes. 2007 Apr;21(2):97-102
pubmed: 17029878
J Fish Dis. 2016 Oct;39(10):1187-200
pubmed: 26814373
Acta Biol Hung. 2013 Mar;64(1):34-44
pubmed: 23567829
Fish Physiol Biochem. 2012 Dec;38(6):1545-1552
pubmed: 22752268
Dis Aquat Organ. 2007 Aug 13;77(1):41-52
pubmed: 17933396
Dis Aquat Organ. 2013 Jul 22;105(2):139-48
pubmed: 23872857
J Fish Dis. 2012 Sep;35(9):623-35
pubmed: 22671918
Parasitology. 2007 Jul;134(Pt 7):1041-51
pubmed: 17352849
Mol Cell Probes. 2011 Feb;25(1):13-8
pubmed: 20933594
J Parasitol. 2012 Jun;98(3):472-8
pubmed: 22256988