Factors associated with women's adherence to postpartum thromboprophylaxis.
Adult
Anticoagulants
/ administration & dosage
Cohort Studies
Enoxaparin
/ administration & dosage
Female
Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Medication Adherence
/ psychology
Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
/ methods
Postnatal Care
/ methods
Postpartum Period
/ drug effects
Retrospective Studies
Self Report
/ standards
Venous Thromboembolism
/ prevention & control
Adherence
Compliance
Low-molecular weight heparin
Postpartum thromboprophylaxis
Venous thromboembolism
Journal
Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis
ISSN: 1573-742X
Titre abrégé: J Thromb Thrombolysis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9502018
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
8
9
2019
medline:
11
11
2020
entrez:
8
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Postpartum low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) thromboprophylaxis is indicated for a substantial proportion of women. We assessed women's adherence to postpartum thromboprophylaxis and the factors associated with adherence. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital during 2018. Parturients for whom a recommendation for LMWH prophylaxis was given at discharge from the maternity ward were contacted at the end of the recommended post-discharge course of LMWH, and were invited to participate in a telephone survey. The main outcome measures were optimal (> 80%) and suboptimal adherence (< 80%) to LMWH administration, reasons for nonadherence, and views regarding LMWH, as assessed by an adapted Beliefs about Medication Questionnaire. Overall, 250 women completed the questionnaire. The median recommended duration of post-discharge LMWH was 7 [5-8] days. Suboptimal adherence was reported by 82 (32.8%); 45 (18.0%) women did not administer any LMWH dose following discharge and only 147 (58.8%) completed the full LMWH course. In multivariate analysis, patients' perceptions of the necessity of LMWH [odds ratio (95% CI): 3.50 (2.12, 9.53), P = 0.002] and of the adequacy of the explanation given prior to discharge regarding LMWH technical administration [odds ratio (95% CI): 5.0 (2.33, 11.11), P < 0.001] were positively associated with optimal adherence. Nearly one-third of women prescribed postpartum LMWH thromboprophylaxis reported suboptimal adherence. Patients' perceptions of the necessity of the treatment and their opinion of the adequacy of explanation regarding LMWH technical administration were identified as predictors of treatment compliance, and thus represent potential areas for improvement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31493289
doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01952-4
pii: 10.1007/s11239-019-01952-4
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Enoxaparin
0
Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
304-311Références
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Aug;14(8):1673-6
pubmed: 27346676
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):e1-e17
pubmed: 29939938
Chest. 2016 Jul;150(1):e1-4
pubmed: 27396794
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Feb;66(2):207-14
pubmed: 19841915
Circ Res. 2016 Apr 29;118(9):1409-24
pubmed: 27126650
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 29;362(17):1553-5
pubmed: 20375400
Thromb Res. 2019 Jan;173:85-90
pubmed: 30500674
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Nov 15;143(10):697-706
pubmed: 16287790
Pharm World Sci. 2006 Jun;28(3):165-70
pubmed: 17004019
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;116(6):1302-9
pubmed: 21099595
J Thromb Haemost. 2008 Jun;6(6):905-12
pubmed: 18363820
BJOG. 2011 Mar;118 Suppl 1:1-203
pubmed: 21356004
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Dec;40(6):1511-1518
pubmed: 30306454
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2005 Nov;8(4):214-20
pubmed: 15959622
JAMA Surg. 2014 Apr;149(4):365-70
pubmed: 24577627
Obstet Med. 2011 Mar;4(1):12-4
pubmed: 27579089
J Thromb Haemost. 2012 Dec;10(12):2526-34
pubmed: 23039905
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Mar;95(1):127-31
pubmed: 11267734
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Jun;36(6):527-53
pubmed: 24927193
Br J Haematol. 2005 Mar;128(5):593-601
pubmed: 15725079
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013;2013:464-70
pubmed: 24319220
Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e691S-e736S
pubmed: 22315276
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(8):793-6
pubmed: 25692872