Inferring Interactivity From Gaze Patterns During Triadic Person-Object-Agent Interactions.
eye contact
human-agent interaction
joint attention
non-verbal communication
social gaze
social psychology
triadic interaction
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
23
04
2019
accepted:
05
08
2019
entrez:
10
9
2019
pubmed:
10
9
2019
medline:
10
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Observing others' gaze informs us about relevant matters in the environment. Humans' sensitivity to gaze cues and our ability to use this information to focus our own attention is crucial to learning, social coordination, and survival. Gaze can also be a deliberate social signal which captures and directs the gaze of others toward an object of interest. In the current study, we investigated whether the intention to actively communicate one's own attentional focus can be inferred from the dynamics of gaze alone. We used a triadic gaze interaction paradigm based on the recently proposed classification of attentional states and respective gaze patterns in person-object-person interactions, the so-called "social gaze space (SGS)." Twenty-eight participants interacted with a computer controlled virtual agent while they assumed to interact with a real human. During the experiment, the virtual agent engaged in various gaze patterns which were determined by the agent's attentional communicative state, as described by the concept of SGS. After each interaction, participants were asked to judge whether the other person was trying to deliberately interact with them. Results show that participants were able to infer the communicative intention solely from the agent's gaze behavior. The results substantiate claims about the pivotal role of gaze in social coordination and relationship formation. Our results further reveal that social expectations are reflected in differential responses to the displayed gaze patterns and may be crucial for impression formation during gaze-based interaction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to document the experience of interactivity in continuous and contingent triadic gaze interactions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31496976
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01913
pmc: PMC6712091
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1913Références
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000 Aug;24(6):581-604
pubmed: 10940436
J Autism Dev Disord. 2001 Feb;31(1):5-17
pubmed: 11439754
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 9;99(14):9602-5
pubmed: 12082186
Neuroreport. 2004 Nov 15;15(16):2553-5
pubmed: 15538194
Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Mar;21(6):1763-6
pubmed: 15845105
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2005;70(1):vii-132
pubmed: 16156847
Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;17(6):514-20
pubmed: 16771802
J Hum Evol. 2007 Mar;52(3):314-20
pubmed: 17140637
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):639-48
pubmed: 17296598
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Dec;13(6):1061-6
pubmed: 17484436
Child Dev. 2007 May-Jun;78(3):938-54
pubmed: 17517014
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(9):2423-30
pubmed: 18402988
Curr Biol. 2008 May 6;18(9):668-71
pubmed: 18439827
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63
pubmed: 18481363
Neurophysiol Clin. 2008 Jun;38(3):197-207
pubmed: 18539254
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jul;12(7):254-8
pubmed: 18555735
Front Neuroinform. 2009 Jan 15;2:10
pubmed: 19198666
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar;13(3):127-34
pubmed: 19217822
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007 Oct 1;16(5):269-274
pubmed: 19343102
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 Jun;33(6):843-63
pubmed: 19428496
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Dec;22(12):2702-15
pubmed: 19929761
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Mar;5(1):98-107
pubmed: 20223797
Neural Netw. 2010 Oct-Nov;23(8-9):1077-90
pubmed: 20620019
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Sep;6(4):486-94
pubmed: 20650942
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Feb;73(2):291-6
pubmed: 21264723
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27591
pubmed: 22096599
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 25;6:143
pubmed: 22654747
Front Psychol. 2012 Dec 03;3:537
pubmed: 23227017
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Feb 01;7:22
pubmed: 23378836
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):393-414
pubmed: 23883742
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2356
pubmed: 23912766
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Dec;37(10 Pt 2):2516-28
pubmed: 23928088
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Dec;46(4):913-21
pubmed: 24258321
Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 1;101:124-37
pubmed: 24996121
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Oct 15;8:807
pubmed: 25360098
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:359-64
pubmed: 25540833
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 23;6:1423
pubmed: 26441793
Neuroimage. 2016 Apr 15;130:248-260
pubmed: 26892856
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Jan;12(1):107-121
pubmed: 28073330
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Jan 09;14:112-121
pubmed: 28180069
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Mar 15;284(1850):null
pubmed: 28250186
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 26;9:226
pubmed: 29535666