Acute surgical vs non-surgical management for ocular and peri-ocular burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Burns
Eye
Eyebrows
Eyelashes
Keratitis
Ocular
Peri-ocular
Stem cell transplantation
Visual acuity
Journal
Burns & trauma
ISSN: 2321-3868
Titre abrégé: Burns Trauma
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101651457
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
22
04
2019
accepted:
22
05
2019
entrez:
10
9
2019
pubmed:
10
9
2019
medline:
10
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Burn-related injury to the face involving the structures of the eyes, eyelids, eyelashes, and/or eyebrows could result in multiple reconstructive procedures to improve functional and cosmetic outcomes, and correct complications following poor acute phase management. The objective of this article was to evaluate if non-surgical or surgical interventions are best for acute management of ocular and/or peri-ocular burns. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared 272 surgical to 535 non-surgical interventions within 1 month of patients suffering burn-related injuries to 465 eyes, 253 eyelids, 90 eyelashes, and 0 eyebrows and evaluated associated outcomes and complications. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were systematically and independently searched. Patient and clinical characteristics, surgical and medical interventions, outcomes, and complications were recorded. Eight of the 14,927 studies queried for this study were eligible for the systematic review and meta-analysis, with results from 33 of the possible 58 outcomes and complications using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines. Surgery was associated with standard mean differences (SMD) 0.44 greater visual acuity on follow-up, SMD 1.63 mm shorter epithelial defect diameters on follow-up, SMD 1.55 mm greater changes in epithelial diameters from baseline, SMD 1.17 mm This systematic review and meta-analysis found that compared to non-surgical interventions, acute surgical interventions for ocular, eyelid, and/or eyelash burns were found to have greater visual acuity on follow-up, shorter epithelial defect diameters on follow-up, greater changes in epithelial diameters from baseline, smaller epithelial defect areas on follow-up, greater changes in epithelial defect areas from baseline, greater numbers of healed epithelial defects, more keratitis infections, and a greater reduction in limbal ischemia, possibility preventing the need of a future limbal stem cell transplantation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Burn-related injury to the face involving the structures of the eyes, eyelids, eyelashes, and/or eyebrows could result in multiple reconstructive procedures to improve functional and cosmetic outcomes, and correct complications following poor acute phase management. The objective of this article was to evaluate if non-surgical or surgical interventions are best for acute management of ocular and/or peri-ocular burns.
METHODS
METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis compared 272 surgical to 535 non-surgical interventions within 1 month of patients suffering burn-related injuries to 465 eyes, 253 eyelids, 90 eyelashes, and 0 eyebrows and evaluated associated outcomes and complications. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were systematically and independently searched. Patient and clinical characteristics, surgical and medical interventions, outcomes, and complications were recorded.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eight of the 14,927 studies queried for this study were eligible for the systematic review and meta-analysis, with results from 33 of the possible 58 outcomes and complications using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines. Surgery was associated with standard mean differences (SMD) 0.44 greater visual acuity on follow-up, SMD 1.63 mm shorter epithelial defect diameters on follow-up, SMD 1.55 mm greater changes in epithelial diameters from baseline, SMD 1.17 mm
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and meta-analysis found that compared to non-surgical interventions, acute surgical interventions for ocular, eyelid, and/or eyelash burns were found to have greater visual acuity on follow-up, shorter epithelial defect diameters on follow-up, greater changes in epithelial diameters from baseline, smaller epithelial defect areas on follow-up, greater changes in epithelial defect areas from baseline, greater numbers of healed epithelial defects, more keratitis infections, and a greater reduction in limbal ischemia, possibility preventing the need of a future limbal stem cell transplantation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31497611
doi: 10.1186/s41038-019-0161-4
pii: 161
pmc: PMC6717987
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
25Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Nov;85(11):1379-83
pubmed: 11673310
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 May;18(3):196-201
pubmed: 12021650
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120
Ophthalmology. 2005 Nov;112(11):1963-9
pubmed: 16198422
Cornea. 2006 Sep;25(8):908-13
pubmed: 17102665
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jul-Aug;18(4):517-28
pubmed: 18609468
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100
pubmed: 19621070
Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Feb;95(2):199-204
pubmed: 20675729
Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Feb;95(2):194-8
pubmed: 20805137
J Burn Care Res. 2010 Nov-Dec;31(6):911-7
pubmed: 20859213
Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 15;3:37
pubmed: 24731537
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;(4):MR000034
pubmed: 24782322
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 May;99(5):669-73
pubmed: 25370084
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135
pubmed: 25524443
Res Synth Methods. 2014 Mar;5(1):79-85
pubmed: 26054027
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;168:157-163
pubmed: 27210276
J Burn Care Res. 2017 Mar/Apr;38(2):71-77
pubmed: 27355655
Burns Trauma. 2017 Sep 4;5:26
pubmed: 28879205
Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1965;85:631-53
pubmed: 5227208
J Trauma. 1983 Oct;23(10):874-7
pubmed: 6355497