nanite: using machine learning to assess the quality of atomic force microscopy-enabled nano-indentation data.
Atomic force microscopy
Elasticity
Machine learning
Sorting
Journal
BMC bioinformatics
ISSN: 1471-2105
Titre abrégé: BMC Bioinformatics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965194
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Sep 2019
10 Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
01
02
2019
accepted:
29
07
2019
entrez:
11
9
2019
pubmed:
11
9
2019
medline:
9
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) allows the mechanical characterization of single cells and live tissue by quantifying force-distance (FD) data in nano-indentation experiments. One of the main problems when dealing with biological tissue is the fact that the measured FD curves can be disturbed. These disturbances are caused, for instance, by passive cell movement, adhesive forces between the AFM probe and the cell, or insufficient attachment of the tissue to the supporting cover slide. In practice, the resulting artifacts are easily spotted by an experimenter who then manually sorts out curves before proceeding with data evaluation. However, this manual sorting step becomes increasingly cumbersome for studies that involve numerous measurements or for quantitative imaging based on FD maps. We introduce the Python package nanite, which automates all basic aspects of FD data analysis, including data import, tip-sample separation, base line correction, contact point retrieval, and model fitting. In addition, nanite enables the automation of the sorting step using supervised learning. This learning approach relates subjective ratings to predefined features extracted from FD curves. For ratings ranging from 0 to 10, our approach achieves a mean squared error below 1.0 rating points and a classification accuracy between good and poor curves that is above 87%. We showcase our approach by quantifying Young's moduli of the zebrafish spinal cord at different classification thresholds and by introducing data quality as a new dimension for quantitative AFM image analysis. The addition of quality-based sorting using supervised learning enables a fully automated and reproducible FD data analysis pipeline for biological samples in AFM.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) allows the mechanical characterization of single cells and live tissue by quantifying force-distance (FD) data in nano-indentation experiments. One of the main problems when dealing with biological tissue is the fact that the measured FD curves can be disturbed. These disturbances are caused, for instance, by passive cell movement, adhesive forces between the AFM probe and the cell, or insufficient attachment of the tissue to the supporting cover slide. In practice, the resulting artifacts are easily spotted by an experimenter who then manually sorts out curves before proceeding with data evaluation. However, this manual sorting step becomes increasingly cumbersome for studies that involve numerous measurements or for quantitative imaging based on FD maps.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We introduce the Python package nanite, which automates all basic aspects of FD data analysis, including data import, tip-sample separation, base line correction, contact point retrieval, and model fitting. In addition, nanite enables the automation of the sorting step using supervised learning. This learning approach relates subjective ratings to predefined features extracted from FD curves. For ratings ranging from 0 to 10, our approach achieves a mean squared error below 1.0 rating points and a classification accuracy between good and poor curves that is above 87%. We showcase our approach by quantifying Young's moduli of the zebrafish spinal cord at different classification thresholds and by introducing data quality as a new dimension for quantitative AFM image analysis.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The addition of quality-based sorting using supervised learning enables a fully automated and reproducible FD data analysis pipeline for biological samples in AFM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31500563
doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3010-3
pii: 10.1186/s12859-019-3010-3
pmc: PMC6734308
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
465Subventions
Organisme : Volkswagen Foundation
ID : 92847
Organisme : H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
ID : 641639
Références
J Biomech. 2010 Nov 16;43(15):2986-92
pubmed: 20656292
Biophys J. 2010 Jun 16;98(12):2848-56
pubmed: 20550897
Biophys J. 1996 Jan;70(1):556-67
pubmed: 8770233
Differentiation. 2013 Oct;86(3):112-20
pubmed: 23969122
Biophys J. 2020 Jan 21;118(2):448-463
pubmed: 31870536
Nat Nanotechnol. 2012 Nov;7(11):757-65
pubmed: 23085644
Dev Dyn. 2010 Feb;239(2):592-7
pubmed: 19918882
Cell. 2009 Nov 25;139(5):891-906
pubmed: 19931152
Open Biol. 2014 May;4(5):140046
pubmed: 24850913
Nat Mater. 2013 Mar;12(3):253-61
pubmed: 23291707
Nat Chem Biol. 2009 Jun;5(6):383-90
pubmed: 19448607
J Biomech. 2010 Jan 19;43(2):349-54
pubmed: 19772964
Soft Matter. 2015 Jun 21;11(23):4584-4591
pubmed: 25891371
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Dec;15(12):786-801
pubmed: 25415508
Physiology (Bethesda). 2018 Jan 1;33(1):16-25
pubmed: 29212889
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1886:315-324
pubmed: 30374876
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2009 Nov;48(6):785-9
pubmed: 19930828
Biophys J. 2003 Mar;84(3):2071-9
pubmed: 12609908