The impact of post-fall huddles on repeat fall rates and perceptions of safety culture: a quasi-experimental evaluation of a patient safety demonstration project.
Post-fall huddles
Safety culture
Teamwork
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Sep 2019
09 Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
10
09
2018
accepted:
22
08
2019
entrez:
11
9
2019
pubmed:
11
9
2019
medline:
6
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Conducting post-fall huddles is considered an integral component of a fall-risk-reduction program. However, there is no evidence linking post-fall huddles to patient outcomes or perceptions of teamwork and safety culture. The purpose of this study is to determine associations between conducting post-fall huddles and repeat fall rates and between post-fall huddle participation and perceptions of teamwork and safety culture. During a two-year demonstration project, we developed a system for 16 small rural hospitals to report, benchmark, and learn from fall events, and we trained them to conduct post-fall huddles. To calculate a hospital's repeat fall rate, we divided the total number of falls reported by the hospital by the number of unique medical record numbers associated with each fall. We used Spearman correlations with exact P values to determine the association between the proportion of falls followed by a huddle and the repeat fall rate. At study end, we used the TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) to assess perceptions of teamwork support for fall-risk reduction and the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS) to assess perceptions of safety culture. We added an item to the T-TPQ for respondents to indicate the number of post-fall huddles in which they had participated. We used a binary logistic regression with a logit link to examine the effect of participation in post-fall huddles on respondent-level percent positive T-TPQ and HSOPS scores. We accounted for clustering of respondents within hospitals with random effects using the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS/STAT. Repeat fall rates were negatively associated with the proportion of falls followed by a huddle. As compared to hospital staff who did not participate in huddles, those who participated in huddles had more positive perceptions of four domains of safety culture and how team structure, team leadership, and situation monitoring supported fall-risk reduction. Post-fall huddles may reduce the risk of repeat falls. Staff who participate in post-fall huddles are likely to have positive perceptions of teamwork support for fall-risk reduction and safety culture because huddles are a team-based approach to reporting, adapting, and learning.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Conducting post-fall huddles is considered an integral component of a fall-risk-reduction program. However, there is no evidence linking post-fall huddles to patient outcomes or perceptions of teamwork and safety culture. The purpose of this study is to determine associations between conducting post-fall huddles and repeat fall rates and between post-fall huddle participation and perceptions of teamwork and safety culture.
METHODS
METHODS
During a two-year demonstration project, we developed a system for 16 small rural hospitals to report, benchmark, and learn from fall events, and we trained them to conduct post-fall huddles. To calculate a hospital's repeat fall rate, we divided the total number of falls reported by the hospital by the number of unique medical record numbers associated with each fall. We used Spearman correlations with exact P values to determine the association between the proportion of falls followed by a huddle and the repeat fall rate. At study end, we used the TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) to assess perceptions of teamwork support for fall-risk reduction and the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS) to assess perceptions of safety culture. We added an item to the T-TPQ for respondents to indicate the number of post-fall huddles in which they had participated. We used a binary logistic regression with a logit link to examine the effect of participation in post-fall huddles on respondent-level percent positive T-TPQ and HSOPS scores. We accounted for clustering of respondents within hospitals with random effects using the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS/STAT.
RESULT
RESULTS
Repeat fall rates were negatively associated with the proportion of falls followed by a huddle. As compared to hospital staff who did not participate in huddles, those who participated in huddles had more positive perceptions of four domains of safety culture and how team structure, team leadership, and situation monitoring supported fall-risk reduction.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Post-fall huddles may reduce the risk of repeat falls. Staff who participate in post-fall huddles are likely to have positive perceptions of teamwork support for fall-risk reduction and safety culture because huddles are a team-based approach to reporting, adapting, and learning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31500609
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4453-y
pii: 10.1186/s12913-019-4453-y
pmc: PMC6734353
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
650Subventions
Organisme : Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
ID : 1R03HS024630-01
Organisme : Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
ID : 1R18HS021429-01
Organisme : Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services
ID : 20871-Y3
Références
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):504-516
pubmed: 29792464
J Rural Health. 2015 Spring;31(2):135-45
pubmed: 25182938
Gerontologist. 1987 Aug;27(4):516-22
pubmed: 3623149
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 May;63(5):983-7
pubmed: 25940548
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr;20(4):338-43
pubmed: 21303770
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Feb;222(2):122-8
pubmed: 26712245
J Healthc Qual. 2010 Nov-Dec;32(6):9-17
pubmed: 20946421
Clin Geriatr Med. 2010 Nov;26(4):645-92
pubmed: 20934615
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jul 08;10:199
pubmed: 20615247
Sentinel Event Alert. 2015 Sep 28;(55):1-5
pubmed: 26422837
Med Educ. 2014 Jul;48(7):657-66
pubmed: 24909527
J Patient Saf. 2013 Mar;9(1):13-7
pubmed: 23143749
JAMA. 2008 Mar 12;299(10):1182-4
pubmed: 18334694
Risk Anal. 2010 Oct;30(10):1466-80
pubmed: 20626685
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Mar;42(2):750-7
pubmed: 20159103
Nurs Outlook. 2010 Sep-Oct;58(5):233-41
pubmed: 20934078
Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb;44(1):205-24
pubmed: 18823446
Am J Nurs. 2016 Jan;116(1):42-7
pubmed: 26710147
Sentinel Event Alert. ;(57):1-8
pubmed: 28353329
Hum Factors. 2013 Feb;55(1):231-45
pubmed: 23516804
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18(1):37-41
pubmed: 19204130
Clin Geriatr Med. 2019 May;35(2):273-283
pubmed: 30929888
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 2):390-6
pubmed: 23460095
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):608-631
pubmed: 28994106
J Occup Organ Psychol. 2015 Jun;88(2):322-340
pubmed: 29962664
J Patient Saf. 2012 Sep;8(3):131-9
pubmed: 22785344
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 May;22(5):394-404
pubmed: 23436556
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):994-1006
pubmed: 31215029
World Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;107:597-603
pubmed: 28843757
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014 Aug;40(8):358-64
pubmed: 25208441
J Patient Saf. 2010 Dec;6(4):226-32
pubmed: 21099551
J Nurs Care Qual. 2008 Jul-Sep;23(3):233-41
pubmed: 18562866
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Sep;90(5):964-71
pubmed: 16162068
J Appl Psychol. 2006 May;91(3):669-80
pubmed: 16737362
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Mar;26(3):226-235
pubmed: 27222593
Age Ageing. 2014 Mar;43(2):247-53
pubmed: 24141253
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Nov 20;157(10):692-9
pubmed: 23165660
J Nurs Care Qual. 2009 Jan-Mar;24(1):33-41
pubmed: 19092477
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Mar;58(3):435-41
pubmed: 20398112
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Sep;39(9):1513-23
pubmed: 23754132
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 2):369-74
pubmed: 23460092
Int J Nurs Pract. 2001 Feb;7(1):38-45
pubmed: 11811346
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Jun;22(3):151-61
pubmed: 20382662
Age Ageing. 2004 Mar;33(2):122-30
pubmed: 14960426