Defining freshwater as a natural resource: A framework linking water use to the area of protection natural resources.
Freshwater resources
Life cycle impact assessment
Long-term depletion
Long-term pollution
Water use
Journal
The international journal of life cycle assessment
ISSN: 0948-3349
Titre abrégé: Int J Life Cycle Assess
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101659490
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
entrez:
11
9
2019
pubmed:
11
9
2019
medline:
11
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While many examples have shown unsustainable use of freshwater resources, existing LCIA methods for water use do not comprehensively address impacts to natural resources for future generations. This framework aims to (1) define freshwater resource as an item to protect within the Area of Protection (AoP) natural resources, (2) identify relevant impact pathways affecting freshwater resources, and (3) outline methodological choices for impact characterization model development. Considering the current scope of the AoP natural resources, the complex nature of freshwater resources and its important dimensions to safeguard safe future supply, a definition of freshwater resource is proposed, including water quality aspects. In order to clearly define what is to be protected, the freshwater resource is put in perspective through the lens of the three main safeguard subjects defined by Dewulf et al. (2015). In addition, an extensive literature review identifies a wide range of possible impact pathways to freshwater resources, establishing the link between different inventory elementary flows (water consumption, emissions and land use) and their potential to cause long-term freshwater depletion or degradation. Freshwater as a resource has a particular status in LCA resource assessment. First, it exists in the form of three types of resources: flow, fund, or stock. Then, in addition to being a resource for human economic activities (e.g. hydropower), it is above all a non-substitutable support for life that can be affected by both consumption (source function) and pollution (sink function). Therefore, both types of elementary flows (water consumption and emissions) should be linked to a damage indicator for freshwater as a resource. Land use is also identified as a potential stressor to freshwater resources by altering runoff, infiltration and erosion processes as well as evapotranspiration. It is suggested to use the concept of recovery period to operationalize this framework: when the recovery period lasts longer than a given period of time, impacts are considered to be irreversible and fall into the concern of freshwater resources protection (i.e. affecting future generations), while short-term impacts effect the AoP ecosystem quality and human health directly. It is shown that it is relevant to include this concept in the impact assessment stage in order to discriminate the long-term from the short-term impacts, as some dynamic fate models already do. This framework provides a solid basis for the consistent development of future LCIA methods for freshwater resources, thereby capturing the potential long-term impacts that could warn decision makers about potential safe water supply issues in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31501640
doi: 10.1007/s11367-018-1543-8
pmc: PMC6733276
mid: NIHMS1531721
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
960-974Subventions
Organisme : Intramural EPA
ID : EPA999999
Pays : United States
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 12;109(24):9320-5
pubmed: 22645352
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Jun 18;47(12):6384-92
pubmed: 23597228
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Aug 15;44(16):6019-21
pubmed: 20578735
Environ Pollut. 2009 May;157(5):1697-705
pubmed: 19167793
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 May 5;49(9):5310-7
pubmed: 25867920
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Jun 1;43(11):4098-104
pubmed: 19569336
Sci Total Environ. 2011 Sep 15;409(20):4206-16
pubmed: 21840571
J Clean Prod. 2017 Sep 10;161:957-967
pubmed: 32461713
Ecol Appl. 2014 Jun;24(4):617-32
pubmed: 24988764
Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(21):11926-7
pubmed: 24147821
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 1;599-600:806-819
pubmed: 28499229
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Oct 15;45(20):8948-57
pubmed: 21905685
Ecol Indic. 2017 Jan;72:352-359
pubmed: 30344449
Sci Total Environ. 1997 Feb 24;194-195:457-66
pubmed: 9112788
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 21;11(3):e0151993
pubmed: 26998832
Science. 2014 Jun 6;344(6188):1114-7
pubmed: 24904155