Virtual training leads to real acute physical, cognitive, and neural benefits on healthy adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Body ownership
Executive functions
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy
Heart rate
Immersive virtual reality
Prefrontal cortex
Sense of agency
Stroop task
Virtual high-intensity intermittent training
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Sep 2019
11 Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
09
04
2019
accepted:
16
07
2019
entrez:
13
9
2019
pubmed:
13
9
2019
medline:
25
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Keeping a certain level of physical activity has beneficial effects on the body itself but also, surprisingly, on cognition: specifically, physical high-intensity intermittent aerobic exercise (HIE) can show improvement on cognitive executive functions. Although, in some cases performing strength or aerobic training is problematic or not feasible. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) can induce the illusory feeling of ownership and agency over a moving virtual body, therefore showing comparable physiological reactions: for example, if an individual is sitting on a chair but his virtual body climbs a hill, the individual's heart rate increases coherently, as if he is actually walking. In this study, we investigate whether this same illusion can show beneficial consequences on the body as well as on executive functions (using the color-word matching Stroop task) and on its neural substrates (using functional near-infrared spectroscopy [fNIRS]). In a cross-over randomized controlled trial, 30 healthy young adults will experience HIE training in IVR (i.e. the virtual body will perform eight sets of 30 s of running followed by 30 s of slow walking, while the participant is completely still) according to two random-ordered conditions: during the experimental condition, the virtual body is displayed in first-person perspective (1PP), while in the control condition, the virtual body is displayed in third-person perspective (3PP). To confirm that individuals have the illusion of ownership and agency over the virtual body in 1PP (and not in 3PP), we will record the heart rate, in addition to subjective questionnaires. Before and after every IVR sessions (one week apart), we will measure cortical hemodynamic changes in the participants' prefrontal cortex using the fNIRS device during the Stroop task's execution. From a theoretical perspective, we could prove that the sense of body ownership and agency can modulate physical and cognitive parameters, even in the absence of actual movements; from a clinical perspective, these results could be useful to train cognition and body simultaneously, in a completely safe environment. University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry, UMIN000034255 . Registered on 1 October 2018.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Keeping a certain level of physical activity has beneficial effects on the body itself but also, surprisingly, on cognition: specifically, physical high-intensity intermittent aerobic exercise (HIE) can show improvement on cognitive executive functions. Although, in some cases performing strength or aerobic training is problematic or not feasible. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) can induce the illusory feeling of ownership and agency over a moving virtual body, therefore showing comparable physiological reactions: for example, if an individual is sitting on a chair but his virtual body climbs a hill, the individual's heart rate increases coherently, as if he is actually walking. In this study, we investigate whether this same illusion can show beneficial consequences on the body as well as on executive functions (using the color-word matching Stroop task) and on its neural substrates (using functional near-infrared spectroscopy [fNIRS]).
METHODS
METHODS
In a cross-over randomized controlled trial, 30 healthy young adults will experience HIE training in IVR (i.e. the virtual body will perform eight sets of 30 s of running followed by 30 s of slow walking, while the participant is completely still) according to two random-ordered conditions: during the experimental condition, the virtual body is displayed in first-person perspective (1PP), while in the control condition, the virtual body is displayed in third-person perspective (3PP). To confirm that individuals have the illusion of ownership and agency over the virtual body in 1PP (and not in 3PP), we will record the heart rate, in addition to subjective questionnaires. Before and after every IVR sessions (one week apart), we will measure cortical hemodynamic changes in the participants' prefrontal cortex using the fNIRS device during the Stroop task's execution.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
From a theoretical perspective, we could prove that the sense of body ownership and agency can modulate physical and cognitive parameters, even in the absence of actual movements; from a clinical perspective, these results could be useful to train cognition and body simultaneously, in a completely safe environment.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry, UMIN000034255 . Registered on 1 October 2018.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31511036
doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3591-1
pii: 10.1186/s13063-019-3591-1
pmc: PMC6737639
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
559Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists N. 19K20639
Références
Cognition. 1999 Dec 17;73(3):B55-66
pubmed: 10585521
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;52:3-6
pubmed: 10590970
Science. 2000 Jun 9;288(5472):1835-8
pubmed: 10846167
Neuroimage. 2001 Jan;13(1):29-36
pubmed: 11133306
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 May;90(5):1657-62
pubmed: 11299252
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Sep;17(1):61-71
pubmed: 12203689
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Dec;34(12):1996-2001
pubmed: 12471307
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Jan;7(1):38-42
pubmed: 12517357
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jun;16(5):817-27
pubmed: 15200709
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Apr;6(4):332-9
pubmed: 15803164
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Mar;17(1):219-39
pubmed: 17482480
Neurosci Res. 2007 Oct;59(2):136-44
pubmed: 17681629
Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 1;39(3):1064-80
pubmed: 18037310
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jan;9(1):58-65
pubmed: 18094706
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Feb;20(2):312-23
pubmed: 18275337
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2008 Jul;46(7):38-43
pubmed: 18686595
JAMA. 2008 Sep 3;300(9):1027-37
pubmed: 18768414
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Mar;193(3):445-54
pubmed: 19030850
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Dec 12;364(1535):3549-57
pubmed: 19884149
Neuroimage. 2010 May 1;50(4):1702-10
pubmed: 20006719
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;662:205-12
pubmed: 20204793
Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203
pubmed: 2034749
PLoS One. 2010 May 12;5(5):e10564
pubmed: 20485681
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Oct;43(10):1849-56
pubmed: 21448086
Neurobiol Aging. 2012 Nov;33(11):2621-32
pubmed: 22300952
Trials. 2012 Oct 29;13:200
pubmed: 23107038
BMJ. 2013 Jan 08;346:e7586
pubmed: 23303884
J Prev Med Public Health. 2013 Jan;46 Suppl 1:S22-7
pubmed: 23412645
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Mar 21;7:83
pubmed: 23519597
Neuroimage. 2014 Sep;98:336-45
pubmed: 24799137
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 9;111(49):17678-83
pubmed: 25422444
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Apr;233(4):1247-59
pubmed: 25618006
Rejuvenation Res. 2015 Oct;18(5):389-412
pubmed: 25808052
J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Aug;19(8):616-28
pubmed: 26552574
J Neurosci. 2016 Jan 13;36(2):268-79
pubmed: 26758821
BMC Neurosci. 2016 Feb 01;17:9
pubmed: 26831898
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 01;6:28879
pubmed: 27364767
Trials. 2016 Jul 22;17:334
pubmed: 27484173
J Athl Train. 2016 Sep;51(9):739-742
pubmed: 27813685
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 09;7:2052
pubmed: 28119650
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 14;8:370
pubmed: 28352241
Cognition. 2017 Sep;166:164-173
pubmed: 28577446
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 29;7(1):9637
pubmed: 28851953
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Dec;235(12):3785-3797
pubmed: 28975416
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 27;7(1):14227
pubmed: 29079802
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 1;169:117-125
pubmed: 29203453
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Dec 22;14:61-72
pubmed: 29339923
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Apr;185:219-228
pubmed: 29533775
NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;42(4):441-448
pubmed: 29660958
Br J Psychol. 2018 Aug;109(3):431-433
pubmed: 29781508
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Jul 10;4:252-262
pubmed: 30094329
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Nov 28;:null
pubmed: 30496547
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Jan;67:86-97
pubmed: 30553938
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 3;14(1):e0209899
pubmed: 30605454
Phys Med Biol. 1988 Dec;33(12):1433-42
pubmed: 3237772
Science. 1995 Sep 29;269(5232):1880-2
pubmed: 7569931
Med Phys. 1995 Dec;22(12):1997-2005
pubmed: 8746704
Nature. 1998 Feb 19;391(6669):756
pubmed: 9486643