Influence of content and intensity of thought on behavioral and pupil changes during active mind-wandering, off-focus, and on-task states.
Attention
Mind wandering
Off-focus state
Pupil size
SART
Journal
Attention, perception & psychophysics
ISSN: 1943-393X
Titre abrégé: Atten Percept Psychophys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101495384
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
14
9
2019
medline:
17
12
2020
entrez:
14
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mind wandering (MW) is a pervasive phenomenon that occurs very frequently, regardless of the task. A content-based definition of MW holds that it occurs when the content of thought switches from an ongoing task and/or an external stimulus-driven event to self-generated or inner thoughts. A recent account suggests that the transition between these different states of attention occurs via an off-focus state. Following this suggestion, previous work relating MW to pupil size might have lumped attentional states that are critically different from each (i.e., off-focus and MW states). In the present study, both behavior and pupil size were measured during a sustained-attention-to-response task, to disentangle the content of thought (on task or MW) from an off-focus state of mind. The off-focus state was operationalized by probing the intensity with which participants were on task or mind-wandering. The results of two experiments showed that the behavioral and phasic pupillary responses were sensitive to changes related to the content of thought. The behavioral responses were furthermore related to the intensity of the thought. However, no clear relation between the different attentional states and tonic pupillary diameter was found, suggesting that it is an unreliable proxy for MW.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31515772
doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01865-7
pii: 10.3758/s13414-019-01865-7
pmc: PMC7303097
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1125-1135Références
Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;132(6):946-958
pubmed: 17073528
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(12):2289-94
pubmed: 24313285
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Aug;16(4):601-15
pubmed: 27038165
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 25;6(3):e18298
pubmed: 21464969
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
pubmed: 9176953
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Mar;21(1):277-91
pubmed: 22001770
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:487-518
pubmed: 25293689
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Aug;20(8):605-617
pubmed: 27318437
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Nov;17(11):718-731
pubmed: 27654862
Neuropsychologia. 1997 Jun;35(6):747-58
pubmed: 9204482
Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 05;4:573
pubmed: 24046753
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 12;4:730
pubmed: 24273520
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e33706
pubmed: 22493672
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 27;9(8):e102463
pubmed: 25162597
Science. 2010 Nov 12;330(6006):932
pubmed: 21071660
Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 27;4:650
pubmed: 24098287
Conscious Cogn. 2006 Sep;15(3):578-92
pubmed: 16427318
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Feb;58:170-185
pubmed: 29275845
Psychol Bull. 1976 Sep;83(5):880-97
pubmed: 794902
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Aug;18(4):638-664
pubmed: 29654476
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1494-1502
pubmed: 27620283
Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 11;5:31
pubmed: 24575056
Neuron. 2016 Jan 6;89(1):221-34
pubmed: 26711118
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 26;106(21):8719-24
pubmed: 19433790
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1983 Jun;9(3):360-70
pubmed: 6223976
Conscious Cogn. 2004 Dec;13(4):657-90
pubmed: 15522626
Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):98-113
pubmed: 19215913
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Nov;66:74-78
pubmed: 30408603
J Neurosci. 2014 Dec 3;34(49):16286-95
pubmed: 25471568
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Aug;20(8):570-578
pubmed: 27353574
Can J Exp Psychol. 2013 Mar;67(1):1-10
pubmed: 23398525
Eur J Neurosci. 2015 Apr;41(8):1068-78
pubmed: 25754528
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Jun;14(3):527-33
pubmed: 17874601