Plasma phospholipid n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids in relation to cardiometabolic markers and gestational diabetes: A longitudinal study within the prospective NICHD Fetal Growth Studies.
Adolescent
Adult
Biomarkers
/ blood
Blood Glucose
/ metabolism
Case-Control Studies
Diabetes, Gestational
/ blood
Fatty Acids, Omega-3
/ blood
Fatty Acids, Omega-6
/ blood
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Insulin
/ blood
Insulin Resistance
Longitudinal Studies
Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Nutritional Status
Phospholipids
/ blood
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Young Adult
Journal
PLoS medicine
ISSN: 1549-1676
Titre abrégé: PLoS Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
11
03
2019
accepted:
14
08
2019
entrez:
14
9
2019
pubmed:
14
9
2019
medline:
25
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite dietary recommendations of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) for cardiometabolic health, n-3 and n-6 PUFAs and their interplay in relation to diabetes risk remain debated. Importantly, data among pregnant women are scarce. We investigated individual plasma phospholipid n-3 and n-6 PUFAs in early to midpregnancy in relation to subsequent risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Within the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Fetal Growth Studies-Singleton Cohort (n = 2,802), individual plasma phospholipid n-3 and n-6 PUFAs levels were measured at gestational weeks (GWs) 10-14, 15-26, 23-31, and 33-39 among 107 GDM cases (ascertained on average at GW 27) and 214 non-GDM controls. Conditional logistic regression was used, adjusting for major risk factors for GDM. After adjusting for covariates, individual n-3 eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosapentaenoic acid (DPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) were inversely correlated with insulin-resistance markers, whereas individual n-6 dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA) was positively correlated with insulin-resistance markers. At GW 15-26, a standard deviation (SD) increase in total n-3 PUFAs and individual n-3 DPA was associated with a 36% (adjusted odds ratio 0.64; 95% CI 0.42-0.96; P = 0.042) and 33% (0.67; 95% CI 0.45-0.99; P = 0.047) lower risk of GDM, respectively; however, the significance did not persist after post hoc false-discovery rate (FDR) correction (FDR-corrected P values > 0.05). Associations between total n-6 PUFAs and GDM were null, whereas associations with individual n-6 PUFAs were differential. Per SD increase, gamma-linolenic acid (GLA) at GWs 10-14 and DGLA at GWs 10-14 and 15-26 were significantly associated with a 1.40- to 1.95-fold higher risk of GDM, whereas docosatetraenoic acid (DTA) at GW 15-26 was associated with a 45% (0.55; 95% CI 0.37-0.83) lower risk of GDM (all FDR-corrected P values < 0.05). Null associations were observed for linoleic acid (LA) in either gestational window in relation to risk of GDM. Women with high (≥median) n-3 PUFAs and low (<median) n-6 PUFAs levels had a 64% (95% CI 0.14-0.95; P value = 0.039) lower risk of GDM versus women with low n-3 and high n-6 PUFAs. Limitations include the inability to distinguish between exogenous and endogenous influences on circulating PUFA levels and the lack of causality inherent in observational studies. Our findings may suggest a potential role of primarily endogenously metabolized plasma phospholipid n-6 PUFAs including GLA, DGLA, and DTA in early to midpregnancy in the development of GDM. Null findings on primarily diet-derived n-3 EPA and DHA and n-6 LA do not provide strong evidence to suggest a beneficial role in prevention of GDM, although not excluding the potential benefit of EPA and DHA on glucose-insulin homeostasis given the inverse associations with insulin-resistance markers. Our findings highlight the importance of assessing individual circulating PUFAs to investigate their distinct pathophysiologic roles in glucose homeostasis in pregnancy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Despite dietary recommendations of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) for cardiometabolic health, n-3 and n-6 PUFAs and their interplay in relation to diabetes risk remain debated. Importantly, data among pregnant women are scarce. We investigated individual plasma phospholipid n-3 and n-6 PUFAs in early to midpregnancy in relation to subsequent risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
METHODS AND FINDINGS
Within the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Fetal Growth Studies-Singleton Cohort (n = 2,802), individual plasma phospholipid n-3 and n-6 PUFAs levels were measured at gestational weeks (GWs) 10-14, 15-26, 23-31, and 33-39 among 107 GDM cases (ascertained on average at GW 27) and 214 non-GDM controls. Conditional logistic regression was used, adjusting for major risk factors for GDM. After adjusting for covariates, individual n-3 eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosapentaenoic acid (DPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) were inversely correlated with insulin-resistance markers, whereas individual n-6 dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA) was positively correlated with insulin-resistance markers. At GW 15-26, a standard deviation (SD) increase in total n-3 PUFAs and individual n-3 DPA was associated with a 36% (adjusted odds ratio 0.64; 95% CI 0.42-0.96; P = 0.042) and 33% (0.67; 95% CI 0.45-0.99; P = 0.047) lower risk of GDM, respectively; however, the significance did not persist after post hoc false-discovery rate (FDR) correction (FDR-corrected P values > 0.05). Associations between total n-6 PUFAs and GDM were null, whereas associations with individual n-6 PUFAs were differential. Per SD increase, gamma-linolenic acid (GLA) at GWs 10-14 and DGLA at GWs 10-14 and 15-26 were significantly associated with a 1.40- to 1.95-fold higher risk of GDM, whereas docosatetraenoic acid (DTA) at GW 15-26 was associated with a 45% (0.55; 95% CI 0.37-0.83) lower risk of GDM (all FDR-corrected P values < 0.05). Null associations were observed for linoleic acid (LA) in either gestational window in relation to risk of GDM. Women with high (≥median) n-3 PUFAs and low (<median) n-6 PUFAs levels had a 64% (95% CI 0.14-0.95; P value = 0.039) lower risk of GDM versus women with low n-3 and high n-6 PUFAs. Limitations include the inability to distinguish between exogenous and endogenous influences on circulating PUFA levels and the lack of causality inherent in observational studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings may suggest a potential role of primarily endogenously metabolized plasma phospholipid n-6 PUFAs including GLA, DGLA, and DTA in early to midpregnancy in the development of GDM. Null findings on primarily diet-derived n-3 EPA and DHA and n-6 LA do not provide strong evidence to suggest a beneficial role in prevention of GDM, although not excluding the potential benefit of EPA and DHA on glucose-insulin homeostasis given the inverse associations with insulin-resistance markers. Our findings highlight the importance of assessing individual circulating PUFAs to investigate their distinct pathophysiologic roles in glucose homeostasis in pregnancy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31518348
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002910
pii: PMEDICINE-D-19-00900
pmc: PMC6743768
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Blood Glucose
0
Fatty Acids, Omega-3
0
Fatty Acids, Omega-6
0
Insulin
0
Phospholipids
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1002910Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : HHSN275201000001Z
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : HHSN275200800014C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : HHSN275200800002C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : HHSN275200800013C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : K01 DK120807
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : HHSN275200800012C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : HHSN275200800003I
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P30 DK092924
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : K12 HD052163
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : HHSN275201000001G
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : HHSN275200800003C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : HHSN275201000009C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : HHSN275200800002I
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : HHSN275200800028C
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. HY served as Guest Editor on PLOS Medicine’s Special Issue on Maternal and Child Health.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2004 Feb 12;350(7):672-83
pubmed: 14764923
Circulation. 2009 Feb 17;119(6):902-7
pubmed: 19171857
J Investig Med. 2017 Oct;65(7):1021-1027
pubmed: 28954844
JAMA. 2005 Jan 5;293(1):77-85
pubmed: 15632339
PLoS Med. 2016 Jul 19;13(7):e1002087
pubmed: 27434027
Diabetes. 2005 Dec;54(12):3458-65
pubmed: 16306362
Circulation. 2014 Oct 28;130(18):1568-78
pubmed: 25161045
Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Jun 1;107(6):1017-1026
pubmed: 29868913
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 1):406-16
pubmed: 23969827
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Feb 8;7(1):e000585
pubmed: 30899527
BMJ. 2013 Feb 04;346:e8707
pubmed: 23386268
Clin Nutr. 2011 Dec;30(6):702-7
pubmed: 21959352
Lipids. 2004 May;39(5):421-4
pubmed: 15506236
PLoS One. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0128001
pubmed: 26011768
Clin Chem. 2006 Dec;52(12):2265-72
pubmed: 17053155
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Feb;15(2):144-52
pubmed: 22950668
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD003205
pubmed: 18254017
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 2;158(7):515-25
pubmed: 23546563
Diabetologia. 2004 Jan;47(1):75-81
pubmed: 14634727
Prog Lipid Res. 2008 Sep;47(5):348-80
pubmed: 18435934
N Engl J Med. 1993 Jan 28;328(4):238-44
pubmed: 8418404
Diabetes. 2016 Nov;65(11):3495-3504
pubmed: 27468747
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Dec;5(12):965-974
pubmed: 29032079
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 18;160(6):398-406
pubmed: 24723079
Acta Diabetol. 2017 Jan;54(1):45-51
pubmed: 27638302
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):449.e1-449.e41
pubmed: 26410205
Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jul;86(1):189-97
pubmed: 17616780
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 Mar;63(3):340-6
pubmed: 17957193
Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 Jul;70(1):53-61
pubmed: 10393139
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44525
pubmed: 22984522
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006 Aug;73(2):178-83
pubmed: 16455150
Curr Diab Rep. 2016 Jan;16(1):7
pubmed: 26742932
Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):930-8
pubmed: 22442398
Clin Chem. 1972 Jun;18(6):499-502
pubmed: 4337382
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Jun;95(6):1378-84
pubmed: 22552037
Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Jan;93(1):127-42
pubmed: 20980488
Cell Metab. 2008 Jan;7(1):45-56
pubmed: 18177724
Diabetes. 1991 Feb;40(2):280-9
pubmed: 1991575
Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):918-29
pubmed: 22442397
Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2011 Aug;95(1-4):1-10
pubmed: 21757024
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004 Nov;58(11):1492-7
pubmed: 15162132
Diabetes Care. 2010 Sep;33(9):2049-54
pubmed: 20805277
J Lipid Res. 1995 Dec;36(12):2471-7
pubmed: 8847474
Br J Nutr. 2012 Jun;107 Suppl 2:S214-27
pubmed: 22591895
N Engl J Med. 1983 Jul 7;309(1):7-12
pubmed: 6343873
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2019 May;144:16-31
pubmed: 31088623
PLoS Med. 2016 Jul 19;13(7):e1002094
pubmed: 27434045
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2011 Jun 10;8:36
pubmed: 21663641
Diabetologia. 1985 Jul;28(7):412-9
pubmed: 3899825
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;103(2):176-85
pubmed: 24300020
Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Oct;24(10):525-35
pubmed: 23791137
Diabetes Care. 2007 Jul;30 Suppl 2:S141-6
pubmed: 17596462
Circulation. 2004 Jun 29;109(25):3244-55
pubmed: 15198946
Lipids Health Dis. 2012 Feb 14;11:25
pubmed: 22333072
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Jun;967:183-95
pubmed: 12079847