Effect of depression and anxiety on health-related quality of life outcomes and patient satisfaction after surgery for cervical compressive myelopathy.

ADF = anterior cervical decompression and fusion ADL = activity of daily living CSM = cervical spondylotic myelopathy HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HADS-A = HADS-Anxiety HADS-D = HADS-Depression HRQOL = health-related quality of life Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale JOA = Japanese Orthopaedic Association MCS = Mental Component Summary NDI = Neck Disability Index OPLL = ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament PCS = Physical Component Summary PDF = posterior cervical decompression and fusion anxiety cervical compressive myelopathy depression health-related quality of life patient satisfaction

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
ISSN: 1547-5646
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Spine
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101223545

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Sep 2019
Historique:
received: 10 05 2019
accepted: 25 06 2019
entrez: 14 9 2019
pubmed: 14 9 2019
medline: 14 9 2019
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Preoperative mood disorders such as depression and anxiety are known to be associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. However, the effects of preoperative depression and anxiety on postoperative HRQOL outcomes and patient satisfaction in cervical compressive myelopathy are yet to be clarified. This study aimed to investigate the effect of depression and anxiety on HRQOL outcomes and patient satisfaction following surgery for cervical compressive myelopathy. The authors reviewed the cases of all consecutive patients with cervical compressive myelopathy who had undergone surgical treatment in the period between January 2012 and March 2017 at their institution. Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the authors classified patients as depressed (HADS-D+) or not depressed (HADS-D-) and anxious (HADS-A+) or not anxious (HADS-A-). Patient HRQOL was evaluated preoperatively and at the end of at least 1 year after surgery using the physical and mental component summaries of the SF-12 Health Survey, EQ-5D (EuroQol health survey of five dimensions), Neck Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale. Patient satisfaction was evaluated on the basis of a seven-item questionnaire and divided into two categories: satisfied and dissatisfied. Preoperative HRQOL statuses, postoperative improvements in HRQOL outcomes, and patient satisfaction were compared between the groups. Among the 121 patients eligible for inclusion in the study, there were 69 patients (57.0%) without depression (HADS-D-) and 52 (43.0%) with depression (HADS-D+) and 82 patients (67.8%) without anxiety (HADS-A-) and 39 (32.2%) with anxiety (HADS-A+). All patients who completed both the preoperative and postoperative questionnaires had significant postoperative improvements in all HRQOL outcomes. The HADS-D+ and HADS-A+ patients had poorer preoperative HRQOL statuses than the HADS-D- and HADS-A- patients, respectively. However, statistically significant improvements in all HRQOL outcomes were observed in both HADS-D+ and HADS-A+ patients. Patient satisfaction was comparable between the HADS-D or HADS-A groups. Cervical compressive myelopathy patients with preoperative depression or anxiety according to the HADS tool had worse preoperative HRQOL statuses. However, patients with cervical compressive myelopathy showed significant improvements in HRQOL outcomes and had sufficient levels of satisfaction after surgery regardless of the presence of preoperative depression or anxiety.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31518976
doi: 10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19569
pii: 2019.6.SPINE19569
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-8

Auteurs

Toru Doi (T)

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo.

Hideki Nakamoto (H)

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo.

Koji Nakajima (K)

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo.

Shima Hirai (S)

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo.

Yusuke Sato (Y)

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo.

So Kato (S)

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo.

Yuki Taniguchi (Y)

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo.

Yoshitaka Matsubayashi (Y)

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo.

Ko Matsudaira (K)

2Department of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo; and.

Katsushi Takeshita (K)

3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.

Sakae Tanaka (S)

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo.

Yasushi Oshima (Y)

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo.

Classifications MeSH