A multiscale mathematical model of cell dynamics during neurogenesis in the mouse cerebral cortex.
Cell cycle indexes
Cell dynamics
Development of the cerebral cortex
Mouse mutant for Ftm/Rpgrip1l
Multiscale mathematical modeling
Neural progenitors
Neurogenesis
Numerical simulations
Time varying transfer rates
Journal
BMC bioinformatics
ISSN: 1471-2105
Titre abrégé: BMC Bioinformatics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965194
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Sep 2019
14 Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
06
03
2019
accepted:
31
07
2019
entrez:
16
9
2019
pubmed:
16
9
2019
medline:
12
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Neurogenesis in the murine cerebral cortex involves the coordinated divisions of two main types of progenitor cells, whose numbers, division modes and cell cycle durations set up the final neuronal output. To understand the respective roles of these factors in the neurogenesis process, we combine experimental in vivo studies with mathematical modeling and numerical simulations of the dynamics of neural progenitor cells. A special focus is put on the population of intermediate progenitors (IPs), a transit amplifying progenitor type critically involved in the size of the final neuron pool. A multiscale formalism describing IP dynamics allows one to track the progression of cells along the subsequent phases of the cell cycle, as well as the temporal evolution of the different cell numbers. Our model takes into account the dividing apical progenitors (AP) engaged into neurogenesis, both neurogenic and proliferative IPs, and the newborn neurons. The transfer rates from one population to another are subject to the mode of division (proliferative, or neurogenic) and may be time-varying. The model outputs are successfully fitted to experimental cell numbers from mouse embryos at different stages of cortical development, taking into account IPs and neurons, in order to adjust the numerical parameters. We provide additional information on cell kinetics, such as the mitotic and S phase indexes, and neurogenic fraction. Applying the model to a mouse mutant for Ftm/Rpgrip1l, a gene involved in human ciliopathies with severe brain abnormalities, reveals a shortening of the neurogenic period associated with an increased influx of newborn IPs from apical progenitors at mid-neurogenesis. Our model can be used to study other mouse mutants with cortical neurogenesis defects and can be adapted to study the importance of progenitor dynamics in cortical evolution and human diseases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Neurogenesis in the murine cerebral cortex involves the coordinated divisions of two main types of progenitor cells, whose numbers, division modes and cell cycle durations set up the final neuronal output. To understand the respective roles of these factors in the neurogenesis process, we combine experimental in vivo studies with mathematical modeling and numerical simulations of the dynamics of neural progenitor cells. A special focus is put on the population of intermediate progenitors (IPs), a transit amplifying progenitor type critically involved in the size of the final neuron pool.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A multiscale formalism describing IP dynamics allows one to track the progression of cells along the subsequent phases of the cell cycle, as well as the temporal evolution of the different cell numbers. Our model takes into account the dividing apical progenitors (AP) engaged into neurogenesis, both neurogenic and proliferative IPs, and the newborn neurons. The transfer rates from one population to another are subject to the mode of division (proliferative, or neurogenic) and may be time-varying. The model outputs are successfully fitted to experimental cell numbers from mouse embryos at different stages of cortical development, taking into account IPs and neurons, in order to adjust the numerical parameters. We provide additional information on cell kinetics, such as the mitotic and S phase indexes, and neurogenic fraction.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Applying the model to a mouse mutant for Ftm/Rpgrip1l, a gene involved in human ciliopathies with severe brain abnormalities, reveals a shortening of the neurogenic period associated with an increased influx of newborn IPs from apical progenitors at mid-neurogenesis. Our model can be used to study other mouse mutants with cortical neurogenesis defects and can be adapted to study the importance of progenitor dynamics in cortical evolution and human diseases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31521111
doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3018-8
pii: 10.1186/s12859-019-3018-8
pmc: PMC6744691
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cytoskeletal Proteins
0
Proteins
0
Rpgrip1 protein, mouse
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
470Subventions
Organisme : Agence Nationale pour la Recherche
ID : `CILIAINTHEBRAIN', project 11-BSV2-0006
Organisme : Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
ID : FRM DEQ20140329544
Organisme : Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
ID : PJA 20171206591
Organisme : Sorbonne Universités Idex Super Emergence Program
ID : SU- 15-R-EMR-05
Références
Cell Prolif. 2003 Feb;36(1):1-26
pubmed: 12558657
Cereb Cortex. 2003 Jun;13(6):592-8
pubmed: 12764033
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Feb;7(2):136-44
pubmed: 14703572
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 2;101(9):3196-201
pubmed: 14963232
Development. 2004 Jul;131(13):3133-45
pubmed: 15175243
J Neurosci. 2005 Jan 5;25(1):247-51
pubmed: 15634788
Neuron. 2005 Jan 20;45(2):207-21
pubmed: 15664173
Dev Biol. 2005 Jul 1;283(1):113-27
pubmed: 15893304
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Oct;17(10):2433-42
pubmed: 17204816
Neuron. 2007 May 3;54(3):357-69
pubmed: 17481390
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Jun;8(6):427-37
pubmed: 17514196
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Jun;8(6):438-50
pubmed: 17514197
Development. 2007 Jul;134(14):2569-77
pubmed: 17553904
Nat Genet. 2007 Jul;39(7):875-81
pubmed: 17558409
Neuron. 2008 Feb 7;57(3):378-92
pubmed: 18255031
PLoS One. 2008 Jun 11;3(6):e2388
pubmed: 18545663
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Mar;19(3):675-87
pubmed: 18653668
J Theor Biol. 2009 Jan 21;256(2):164-79
pubmed: 18977364
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Oct;19(10):2439-50
pubmed: 19168665
Cell Prolif. 2009 Oct;42(5):617-36
pubmed: 19622103
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2009 Nov 15;151C(4):281-95
pubmed: 19876933
Theory Biosci. 2011 Mar;130(1):31-43
pubmed: 20824512
Nat Commun. 2011 Jan 11;2:154
pubmed: 21224845
Curr Opin Neurol. 2011 Apr;24(2):98-105
pubmed: 21386674
Development. 2011 May;138(10):2079-88
pubmed: 21490064
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2012 Apr;24(2):269-76
pubmed: 22342580
Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):47-53
pubmed: 22776449
Bull Math Biol. 2012 Nov;74(11):2692-732
pubmed: 23086287
Neuroimage. 2013 May 1;71:196-206
pubmed: 23353030
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Nov;16(11):1556-66
pubmed: 24056697
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Nov;14(11):755-69
pubmed: 24105342
Neuron. 2013 Oct 16;80(2):442-57
pubmed: 24139044
Development. 2014 Feb;141(4):795-806
pubmed: 24496617
J R Soc Interface. 2014 Mar 05;11(94):20140144
pubmed: 24598209
EMBO Rep. 2014 Apr;15(4):351-64
pubmed: 24639559
Development. 2014 Jun;141(11):2182-94
pubmed: 24866113
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Oct;25(10):3290-302
pubmed: 24927931
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 9;111(49):17642-7
pubmed: 25422426
Cell Adh Migr. 2014;8(4):349-59
pubmed: 25482631
Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Mar 10;9:70
pubmed: 25805971
Front Neurosci. 2015 Apr 07;9:114
pubmed: 25904839
Hum Mol Genet. 2015 Sep 1;24(17):4997-5014
pubmed: 26071364
PLoS Biol. 2015 Aug 07;13(8):e1002217
pubmed: 26252244
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 19;5:13265
pubmed: 26286123
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 Nov;16(11):647-59
pubmed: 26420377
Nat Commun. 2016 Mar 04;7:10936
pubmed: 26939553
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Mar 18;12(3):e1004814
pubmed: 26989903
Bull Math Biol. 2016 May;78(5):859-78
pubmed: 27125657
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Jul;19(7):888-96
pubmed: 27214567
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Oct 1;27(10):4701-4718
pubmed: 27620979
Development. 2017 Jan 15;144(2):201-210
pubmed: 27993979
NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2017 Jun 9;3:16
pubmed: 28649443
BMC Syst Biol. 2017 Oct 3;11(Suppl 5):90
pubmed: 28984196
Development. 2018 Jan 8;145(1):
pubmed: 29229768
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Jul 1;28(7):2540-2550
pubmed: 29688292
Cell. 2018 Jul 26;174(3):590-606.e21
pubmed: 29961574
J Theor Biol. 2019 Nov 21;481:110-118
pubmed: 30121294
Front Neurosci. 2018 Aug 22;12:571
pubmed: 30186101
J Neurosci. 2019 Mar 27;39(13):2398-2415
pubmed: 30692221
Risk Anal. 1996 Aug;16(4):449-58
pubmed: 8819338