Prophylactic Biliary Stenting Before Cholecystectomy in Patients With Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones.

Biliary stent CBD stone Cholecystectomy Endoscopic sphincterotomy Gallstone

Journal

Gastroenterology research
ISSN: 1918-2805
Titre abrégé: Gastroenterology Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101519422

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Historique:
received: 24 07 2019
accepted: 13 08 2019
entrez: 17 9 2019
pubmed: 17 9 2019
medline: 17 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The usefulness of prophylactic biliary stenting for patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS) and gallstones (GS) to prevent recurrent biliary events after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and CBDS extraction before elective cholecystectomy remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of recurrent CBDS around the perioperative period and clarify its risk factors. The clinical data of all patients who received prophylactic biliary stenting after EST for CBDS and later underwent cholecystectomy for GS followed by stent extraction in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The numbers of residual CBDS at the end first and second endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) studies were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a logistic regression model to determine risk factors for recurrent CBDS in the perioperative period. Forty-two consecutive patients received prophylactic biliary stenting and subsequent cholecystectomy for GS. Three of these patients were excluded from this study because the number of residual stones was not confirmed. The median maximum CBDS diameter at second ERC was 0 mm (range, 0 - 10 mm); six patients had multiple CBDS (≥ 5). The number of CBDS at second ERC was increased in comparison to that at the first ERC in 15 patients (38.4%), and was unchanged or decreased in 24 patients. The median minimum cystic duct diameter was 4 mm (range, 1 - 8 mm). The median interval between first ERC and operation was 26 days (range, 2 - 131 days). The median interval between operation and second ERC was 41 days (range, 26 - 96 days). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was performed in 38 patients, one of whom was converted from LC to open cholecystectomy. Postoperative complications (transient bacteremia) occurred in one patient. The cystic duct diameter was an independent risk factor for an increased number of CBDS at second ERC in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio 0.611 (95% confidence interval (0.398 - 0.939)), P = 0.03). Recurrent CBDS around the perioperative period of cholecystectomy is not a rare complication after EST and the removal of CBDS with concomitant GS. Prophylactic biliary stenting is considered useful for preventing CBDS-associated complications, especially for patients in whom the cystic duct diameter is larger (≥ 5 mm).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The usefulness of prophylactic biliary stenting for patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS) and gallstones (GS) to prevent recurrent biliary events after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and CBDS extraction before elective cholecystectomy remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of recurrent CBDS around the perioperative period and clarify its risk factors.
METHODS METHODS
The clinical data of all patients who received prophylactic biliary stenting after EST for CBDS and later underwent cholecystectomy for GS followed by stent extraction in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The numbers of residual CBDS at the end first and second endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) studies were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a logistic regression model to determine risk factors for recurrent CBDS in the perioperative period.
RESULTS RESULTS
Forty-two consecutive patients received prophylactic biliary stenting and subsequent cholecystectomy for GS. Three of these patients were excluded from this study because the number of residual stones was not confirmed. The median maximum CBDS diameter at second ERC was 0 mm (range, 0 - 10 mm); six patients had multiple CBDS (≥ 5). The number of CBDS at second ERC was increased in comparison to that at the first ERC in 15 patients (38.4%), and was unchanged or decreased in 24 patients. The median minimum cystic duct diameter was 4 mm (range, 1 - 8 mm). The median interval between first ERC and operation was 26 days (range, 2 - 131 days). The median interval between operation and second ERC was 41 days (range, 26 - 96 days). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was performed in 38 patients, one of whom was converted from LC to open cholecystectomy. Postoperative complications (transient bacteremia) occurred in one patient. The cystic duct diameter was an independent risk factor for an increased number of CBDS at second ERC in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio 0.611 (95% confidence interval (0.398 - 0.939)), P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Recurrent CBDS around the perioperative period of cholecystectomy is not a rare complication after EST and the removal of CBDS with concomitant GS. Prophylactic biliary stenting is considered useful for preventing CBDS-associated complications, especially for patients in whom the cystic duct diameter is larger (≥ 5 mm).

Identifiants

pubmed: 31523328
doi: 10.14740/gr1207
pmc: PMC6731041
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

191-197

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Références

Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Oct;52(4):490-3
pubmed: 11023565
Am J Gastroenterol. 1975 Jul;64(1):34-43
pubmed: 1155423
Lancet. 2002 Sep 7;360(9335):761-5
pubmed: 12241833
Can J Surg. 2005 Jun;48(3):244-6
pubmed: 16013632
Gastroenterology. 2006 Jan;130(1):96-103
pubmed: 16401473
Surg Endosc. 2008 Sep;22(9):2046-50
pubmed: 18270768
Am J Surg. 2010 Oct;200(4):483-8
pubmed: 20381787
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):429-36
pubmed: 20644963
Dig Endosc. 2011 Jan;23(1):86-90
pubmed: 21198923
J Chin Med Assoc. 2012 Nov;75(11):560-6
pubmed: 23158033
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4620-4
pubmed: 23860609
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2977-2985
pubmed: 27834026
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):17-30
pubmed: 29032610
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Dec;27(6):491-496
pubmed: 29112097
Endoscopy. 2019 May;51(5):472-491
pubmed: 30943551
Gastrointest Endosc. 1974 May;20(4):148-51
pubmed: 4825160
J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Apr;178(4):343-52
pubmed: 7511966
Br J Surg. 1995 Nov;82(11):1516-21
pubmed: 8535807
Lancet. 1996 Apr 6;347(9006):926-9
pubmed: 8598755
Ann Surg. 1998 Feb;227(2):201-4
pubmed: 9488517

Auteurs

Hideaki Kawabata (H)

Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Yukino Kawakatsu (Y)

Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Katsutoshi Yamaguchi (K)

Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Daiki Sone (D)

Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Naonori Inoue (N)

Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Yuki Ueda (Y)

Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Yuji Okazaki (Y)

Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Misuzu Hitomi (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Masatoshi Miyata (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Shigehiro Motoi (S)

Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Kenichirou Fukuda (K)

Department of Surgery, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Yoshihiro Shimizu (Y)

Department of Surgery, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Classifications MeSH