Efficacy and Safety of Alogliptin in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Alogliptin Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor Elderly Type 2 diabetes eGFR

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine research
ISSN: 1918-3003
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101538301

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Historique:
received: 14 08 2019
accepted: 23 08 2019
entrez: 17 9 2019
pubmed: 17 9 2019
medline: 17 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In Japan, with increasing age of the population, diabetic patients often become in need of hemodialysis due to diabetic nephropathy, and thus there is a demand for development of diabetic treatments that take into account renal effects in the elderly. No previous studies of alogliptin had focused on Japanese elderly subjects; we therefore assessed the effects of alogliptin in elderly individuals using available data. Laboratory data were compiled for 1 year at intervals of 3 months following the start of alogliptin treatment. The subjects were divided into three groups by age: < 65 years (n = 110), 65 - 74 years (n = 87), and ≥ 75 years (n = 93). Laboratory values in comparison with baseline were compared within groups at various time points, and changes from baseline were compared among the different groups. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels decreased significantly from baseline values in all groups at and after month 3: the change at month 12 was -0.74±1.45% for the age group < 65, -0.47±1.02% for the age group 65 - 74, and -0.42±1.11% for the age group ≥ 75. The 12-month change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was -6.5 ± 12.0 for the age group < 65, -2.0 ± 8.4 for the age group 65 - 74, and -1.5 ± 10.0 for the age group ≥ 75; the reduction in the age group < 65 was significant, whereas the reduction in the age groups ≥ 65 was not. Alogliptin significantly lowers HbA1c levels in the elderly and can be used without posing any safety issues, including renal effects, thus contributing to safe blood glucose control in clinical practice.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In Japan, with increasing age of the population, diabetic patients often become in need of hemodialysis due to diabetic nephropathy, and thus there is a demand for development of diabetic treatments that take into account renal effects in the elderly. No previous studies of alogliptin had focused on Japanese elderly subjects; we therefore assessed the effects of alogliptin in elderly individuals using available data.
METHODS METHODS
Laboratory data were compiled for 1 year at intervals of 3 months following the start of alogliptin treatment. The subjects were divided into three groups by age: < 65 years (n = 110), 65 - 74 years (n = 87), and ≥ 75 years (n = 93). Laboratory values in comparison with baseline were compared within groups at various time points, and changes from baseline were compared among the different groups.
RESULTS RESULTS
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels decreased significantly from baseline values in all groups at and after month 3: the change at month 12 was -0.74±1.45% for the age group < 65, -0.47±1.02% for the age group 65 - 74, and -0.42±1.11% for the age group ≥ 75. The 12-month change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was -6.5 ± 12.0 for the age group < 65, -2.0 ± 8.4 for the age group 65 - 74, and -1.5 ± 10.0 for the age group ≥ 75; the reduction in the age group < 65 was significant, whereas the reduction in the age groups ≥ 65 was not.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Alogliptin significantly lowers HbA1c levels in the elderly and can be used without posing any safety issues, including renal effects, thus contributing to safe blood glucose control in clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31523339
doi: 10.14740/jocmr3953
pmc: PMC6731051
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

651-663

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

This study was designed and planned by members of the Kanagawa Physicians Association and was funded by the Japan Diabetes Foundation. No company was involved in designing the study, patient enrollment, calculation or analysis of the data, interpretation of the findings, or writing the manuscript.

Références

Diabetes Care. 2003 Oct;26(10):2929-40
pubmed: 14514604
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Nov;91(11):4612-9
pubmed: 16912128
Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2006 Feb;2(2):80-91
pubmed: 16932399
Drug Metab Dispos. 2007 Apr;35(4):533-8
pubmed: 17220239
J Diabetes Complications. 2010 Mar-Apr;24(2):79-83
pubmed: 19261490
Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug;32(8):1513-7
pubmed: 19487634
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Nov;57(11):2011-9
pubmed: 19793357
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jun;34(6):1329-36
pubmed: 21505211
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Sep;27(9):1781-92
pubmed: 21806314
Clin Ther. 2012 Jun;34(6):1247-1258.e22
pubmed: 22608780
Diabetes Metab. 2012 Oct;38(4):359-66
pubmed: 22809630
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012 Aug 06;11:92
pubmed: 22867630
Diabetologia. 2012 Nov;55(11):2946-53
pubmed: 22895807
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Oct;15(10):906-14
pubmed: 23531118
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Aug;61(8):1253-61
pubmed: 23889588
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1327-35
pubmed: 23992602
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013 Sep 17;7:989-1001
pubmed: 24068868
Diabetes Ther. 2014 Jun;5(1):1-41
pubmed: 24664619
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;43(4):1441-9
pubmed: 25159674
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014 Oct;15(15):2121-30
pubmed: 25190226
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015 Jan;16(1):43-62
pubmed: 25381751
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015 Apr;14(4):505-24
pubmed: 25630605
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015 Apr 10;11:229-43
pubmed: 25914541
BMC Endocr Disord. 2015 Jul 03;15:34
pubmed: 26137940
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1989 Mar;18(1):163-83
pubmed: 2645125
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2015 Oct 19;7:91
pubmed: 26500706
J Clin Med Res. 2016 Feb;8(2):130-40
pubmed: 26767082
Endocr J. 2017 Feb 27;64(2):179-189
pubmed: 27840383
Diabetes Ther. 2017 Apr;8(2):251-273
pubmed: 28275958
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jun;40(6):808
pubmed: 28420699
J Clin Med Res. 2017 Jul;9(7):567-572
pubmed: 28611856
J Clin Med Res. 2017 Sep;9(9):802-808
pubmed: 28811859
J Diabetes Investig. 2018 Mar;9(2):360-365
pubmed: 28853228
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018 Aug;22(4):825-834
pubmed: 29275488
Am J Med. 2018 Jul;131(7):813-819.e5
pubmed: 29581078
Diabetol Int. 2017 Oct 14;9(1):66-67
pubmed: 30605174

Auteurs

Hiroshi Takeda (H)

Diabetes Committee Study Group, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.

Nobuo Sasai (N)

Diabetes Committee Study Group, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.

Shogo Ito (S)

Diabetes Committee Study Group, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.

Mitsuo Obana (M)

Diabetes Committee Study Group, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.

Tetsuo Takuma (T)

Diabetes Committee Study Group, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.

Masahiko Takai (M)

Diabetes Committee Study Group, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.

Hideaki Kaneshige (H)

Diabetes Committee Study Group, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.

Hideo Machimura (H)

Diabetes Committee Study Group, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.

Akira Kanamori (A)

Diabetes Committee Study Group, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.

Ikuro Matsuba (I)

Diabetes Committee Study Group, Kanagawa Physicians Association, Kanagawa, Japan.

Classifications MeSH