Potential role of new technological innovations in nonvariceal hemorrhage.
Endoscopic hemostasis
Endoscopic suturing
Gastric antral vascular ectasias
NoN-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage
Over-the-scope clips
Journal
World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy
ISSN: 1948-5190
Titre abrégé: World J Gastrointest Endosc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101532474
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Aug 2019
16 Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
12
05
2019
revised:
16
06
2019
accepted:
20
07
2019
entrez:
17
9
2019
pubmed:
17
9
2019
medline:
17
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The present armamentarium of endoscopic hemostatic therapy for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage includes injection, electrocautery and clips. There are newer endoscopic options such as hemostatic sprays, endoscopic suturing and modifications of current options including coagulation forceps and over-the-scope clips. Peptic hemorrhage is the most prevalent type of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and traditional endoscopic interventions have demonstrated significant hemostasis success. However, the hemostatic success rate is less for other entities such as Dieulafoy's lesions and bleeding from malignant lesions. Novel innovations such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and peroral endoscopic myotomy has spawned a need for dependable hemostasis. Gastric antral vascular ectasias are associated with chronic gastrointestinal bleeding and usually treated by standard argon plasma coagulation (APC), but newer modalities such as radiofrequency ablation, banding, cryotherapy and hybrid APC have been utilized as well. We will opine on whether the newer hemostatic modalities have generated success when traditional modalities fail and should any of these modalities be routinely available in the endoscopic toolbox.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31523376
doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i8.443
pmc: PMC6715570
doi:
Types de publication
Editorial
Langues
eng
Pagination
443-453Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict-of-interest statement: No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Références
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jul;66(1):162-7
pubmed: 17591492
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jul;23(7):1465-9
pubmed: 19125307
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Dec;72(6):1274-8
pubmed: 20951987
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):435-9
pubmed: 22658388
Dig Endosc. 2012 Jul;24(4):237-42
pubmed: 22725108
Endoscopy. 2013 Jun;45(6):489-92
pubmed: 23580408
Endoscopy. 2014 May;46(5):428-31
pubmed: 24505017
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Oct;24(10):713-7
pubmed: 25046386
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Apr 16;7(4):295-307
pubmed: 25901208
Endosc Int Open. 2014 Mar;2(1):E37-40
pubmed: 26134611
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):2026-9
pubmed: 26201415
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):129-36
pubmed: 26318834
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;10(5):615-23
pubmed: 26651414
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Jul;61(7):2011-8
pubmed: 26923946
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul;9(4):635-47
pubmed: 27366229
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 14;22(26):5927-35
pubmed: 27468187
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;32(4):846-851
pubmed: 27648821
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Mar;5(3):E151-E156
pubmed: 28435855
Microsurgery. 1985;6(4):238-43
pubmed: 2935701
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 14;11:1756283X17747471
pubmed: 29399041
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Mar;6(3):E266-E270
pubmed: 29497685
Clin Endosc. 2018 Jul;51(4):352-356
pubmed: 29502382
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Oct;6(8):1155-1160
pubmed: 30288277
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Dec;6(12):E1439-E1444
pubmed: 30539067
Endoscopy. 2019 Jul;51(7):619-627
pubmed: 30861532
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar 29;:null
pubmed: 30927124
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr 7;25(13):1592-1602
pubmed: 30983819