Far Lateral Tubular Decompression: A Case Series Studying One and Two Year Outcomes with Predictors of Failure.
back pain
disability
foraminal stenosis
leg pain
lumbar nerve decompression
minimally invasive surgery
tubular decompression
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jul 2019
13 Jul 2019
Historique:
entrez:
17
9
2019
pubmed:
17
9
2019
medline:
17
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Introduction The optimal surgical treatment of isolated lumbar foraminal stenosis has not been defined. Minimally invasive decompression of the foramen from a far lateral tubular decompression (FLTD) approach has been shown to not only have minimal morbidity but also highly variable success rates at short-term follow-up. It is important to quantify improvement and define the demographic and radiographic parameters that predict failure in this promising, minimally invasive surgical technique. This study investigates pain and disability score improvement following FLTD at 12 and 24 months and investigates associations with failure. Methods All patients who underwent lumbar FLTD by a single surgeon at a single institution from September 2015 to January 2018 were included in this prospective case series. Visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain and leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected preoperatively and at the 12- and 24- month follow-ups. Outcomes between visits were fitted to a linear mixed-effects model. The univariate analysis investigated demographic, radiographic, and operative associations with subsequent open revision. Results A total of 42 patients were included in this study. Back pain (VAS 5.84 to 3.32, p<0.001), leg pain (VAS 7.33 to 2.71, p<0.001), and ODI (48.97 to 28.50, p<0.001) demonstrated significant improvements at the 12-month follow-up. Back pain (VAS 3.71, p=0.004), leg pain (VAS 3.04, p<0.001), and ODI (30.63, p<0.001) improvements were maintained at 24-month follow-up. Four patients (9.5%) required subsequent open revision. Subsequent open revision was associated with prior spine surgery (RR=2.85 (2.07-3.63), p=0.045) and scoliosis ≥10° (RR=6.33 (4.87-7.80), p=0.013). Conclusion Back pain, leg pain, and ODI showed significant improvement postoperatively. Improvement is maintained at two years. Prior spine surgery and scoliosis ≥ 10° may be relative contraindications to FLTD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31523563
doi: 10.7759/cureus.5133
pmc: PMC6741369
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e5133Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952
pubmed: 11074683
Spine J. 2008 Nov-Dec;8(6):968-74
pubmed: 18201937
Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):947-53
pubmed: 20953638
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):302-7
pubmed: 20975597
Neurosurgery. 2014 Sep;10 Suppl 3:436-47; discussion 446-7
pubmed: 24681643
Eur Spine J. 2015 Feb;24(2):388-95
pubmed: 25253301
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Dec 11;9:69
pubmed: 26767161
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016 Nov;59(6):610-614
pubmed: 27847575
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 15;42(14):1096-1105
pubmed: 27870805
Neurol India. 2017 Nov-Dec;65(6):1358-1365
pubmed: 29133715
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2018 Jan 15;58(1):49-58
pubmed: 29176269
Surg Neurol Int. 2018 Apr 23;9:87
pubmed: 29740508