A field experiment on community policing and police legitimacy.


Journal

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 10 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 19 9 2019
medline: 9 4 2020
entrez: 19 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite decades of declining crime rates, longstanding tensions between police and the public continue to frustrate the formation of cooperative relationships necessary for the function of the police and the provision of public safety. In response, policy makers continue to promote community-oriented policing (COP) and its emphasis on positive, nonenforcement contact with the public as an effective strategy for enhancing public trust and police legitimacy. Prior research designs, however, have not leveraged the random assignment of police-public contact to identify the causal effect of such interactions on individual-level attitudes toward the police. Therefore, the question remains: Do positive, nonenforcement interactions with uniformed patrol officers actually cause meaningful improvements in attitudes toward the police? Here, we report on a randomized field experiment conducted in New Haven, CT, that sheds light on this question and identifies the individual-level consequences of positive, nonenforcement contact between police and the public. Findings indicate that a single instance of positive contact with a uniformed police officer can substantially improve public attitudes toward police, including legitimacy and willingness to cooperate. These effects persisted for up to 21 d and were not limited to individuals inclined to trust and cooperate with the police prior to the intervention. This study demonstrates that positive nonenforcement contact can improve public attitudes toward police and suggests that police departments would benefit from an increased focus on strategies that promote positive police-public interactions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31527240
pii: 1910157116
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910157116
pmc: PMC6778229
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

19894-19898

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:375-400
pubmed: 16318600
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 May;90(5):751-83
pubmed: 16737372
Science. 2016 Apr 8;352(6282):220-4
pubmed: 27124458
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 11;115(37):9181-9186
pubmed: 30126997
Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:339-67
pubmed: 18851685

Auteurs

Kyle Peyton (K)

Department of Political Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511; kyle.peyton@yale.edu.
Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.

Michael Sierra-Arévalo (M)

School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102.

David G Rand (DG)

Sloan School, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH