Thoracic cryptococcal osteomyelitis mimicking tuberculosis: A case report.

Cryptococcosis Differential diagnosis Endophthalmitis Osteomyelitis Spine infection Thoracic vertebra

Journal

Surgical neurology international
ISSN: 2229-5097
Titre abrégé: Surg Neurol Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101535836

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 26 01 2019
accepted: 02 04 2019
entrez: 19 9 2019
pubmed: 19 9 2019
medline: 19 9 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Isolated cryptococcal osteomyelitis of the spine is extremely uncommon; there have been only seven cases identified in literature. The majority were originally misdiagnosed as tuberculosis. Here, we present a patient with cryptococcal osteomyelitis of the thoracic spine with associated fungal retinal deposits. A 45-year-old, type II diabetic female presented with a 5-month history of severe back pain. Her magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed osteomyelitis involving the T4 vertebral body with epidural and prevertebral extension; notably, the intervertebral disc spaces were not involved. Although the fine-needle aspiration cytologic examination was inconclusive, the patient was empirically placed on antitubercular drug therapy. One month later, she became fully paraplegic. The MRI now demonstrated osteolytic lesions involving the T4 vertebral body with cord compression. She underwent biopsy of the T4 vertebral body and a transfacet T4 decompression with T2-T6 pedicle screw fixation. Culture and histopathological examinations both documented a cryptococcal infection, and she was placed on appropriate antifungal therapy. Notably, 3 weeks after surgery, she developed a sudden loss of vision loss due to retinal fungal endophthalmitis. She recovered vision in one eye after the administration of intravitreal voriconazole but lost vision in the other eye despite a vitrectomy. Over the next 8 months, she gradually recovered with motor function of 4/5 in both lower extremities without evidence of recurrent disease. Cryptococcal infection should be among the differential diagnostic considerations for patients with vertebral osteomyelitis. Notably, diagnostic delay can lead to devastating neurological deficits and involvement of other organ systems.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Isolated cryptococcal osteomyelitis of the spine is extremely uncommon; there have been only seven cases identified in literature. The majority were originally misdiagnosed as tuberculosis. Here, we present a patient with cryptococcal osteomyelitis of the thoracic spine with associated fungal retinal deposits.
CASE DESCRIPTION METHODS
A 45-year-old, type II diabetic female presented with a 5-month history of severe back pain. Her magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed osteomyelitis involving the T4 vertebral body with epidural and prevertebral extension; notably, the intervertebral disc spaces were not involved. Although the fine-needle aspiration cytologic examination was inconclusive, the patient was empirically placed on antitubercular drug therapy. One month later, she became fully paraplegic. The MRI now demonstrated osteolytic lesions involving the T4 vertebral body with cord compression. She underwent biopsy of the T4 vertebral body and a transfacet T4 decompression with T2-T6 pedicle screw fixation. Culture and histopathological examinations both documented a cryptococcal infection, and she was placed on appropriate antifungal therapy. Notably, 3 weeks after surgery, she developed a sudden loss of vision loss due to retinal fungal endophthalmitis. She recovered vision in one eye after the administration of intravitreal voriconazole but lost vision in the other eye despite a vitrectomy. Over the next 8 months, she gradually recovered with motor function of 4/5 in both lower extremities without evidence of recurrent disease.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Cryptococcal infection should be among the differential diagnostic considerations for patients with vertebral osteomyelitis. Notably, diagnostic delay can lead to devastating neurological deficits and involvement of other organ systems.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31528419
doi: 10.25259/SNI-49-2019
pii: SNI-10-81
pmc: PMC6744792
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

81

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

There are no conflicts of interest.

Références

South Med J. 2001 Sep;94(9):936-8
pubmed: 11592758
Can Med Assoc J. 1955 Jan 1;72(1):33-5
pubmed: 13230982
Br J Neurosurg. 2003 Dec;17(6):556-9
pubmed: 14756487
Spine J. 2005 Jul-Aug;5(4):467-70
pubmed: 15996619
Infection. 2007 Oct;35(5):377-82
pubmed: 17885733
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Mar 07;13:128
pubmed: 23496879
Int J Infect Dis. 2014 Dec;29:162-5
pubmed: 25449251
Orthopade. 2017 Jan;46(1):85-89
pubmed: 27858091

Auteurs

Nitin Adsul (N)

Department of Ortho-Spine Surgery, New Delhi, India.

K L Kalra (KL)

Department of Ortho-Spine Surgery, New Delhi, India.

Nikhil Jain (N)

Department of Ortho-Spine Surgery, New Delhi, India.

Mukesh Haritwal (M)

Department of Ortho-Spine Surgery, New Delhi, India.

R S Chahal (RS)

Department of Ortho-Spine Surgery, New Delhi, India.

Shankar Acharya (S)

Department of Ortho-Spine Surgery, New Delhi, India.

Sunila Jain (S)

Department of Pathology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Classifications MeSH