Pelvic floor ultrasound: when, why, and how?


Journal

Abdominal radiology (New York)
ISSN: 2366-0058
Titre abrégé: Abdom Radiol (NY)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101674571

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 19 9 2019
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 19 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pelvic floor disorders are a significant medical issue, reportedly affecting nearly one in four women in the United States. Nonetheless, until the last decade, there has been relatively limited imaging research into this highly prevalent disorder. The three major imaging modalities utilized to assess pelvic floor function are ultrasound, MRI and fluoroscopy. Pelvic floor ultrasound is a rapidly emerging technique which takes advantage of the widespread availability of ultrasound, the non-invasive and relatively inexpensive approach and the incorporation of real-time imaging and software advances which permit 3-D volume imaging. Pelvic floor ultrasound provides the opportunity to optimize patient counseling and enhance pre-operative planning by providing an anatomic and functional roadmap for the referring clinician. We recommend the consideration of pelvic floor ultrasound, as described here, as an addition to the imaging armamentarium available to physicians and surgeons serving this patient population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31529202
doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02216-8
pii: 10.1007/s00261-019-02216-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1395-1413

Références

Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 2008; 300(11):1311–1316.
doi: 10.1001/jama.300.11.1311
Boyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L. Procedures for urinary incontinence in the United States, 1979-1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189(1):7.
doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.376
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 2003; 61(1):37-49.
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02243-4
Nichols CM, Gill EJ, Nguyen T, Barber MD, Hurt WG. Anal sphincter injury in women with pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104(4):690-6.
doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000139518.46032.e5
Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123(6):1201-6.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000286
Wiskind AK, Creighton SM, Stanton SL. The incidence of genital prolapse after the Burch colposuspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167(2):399-404.
doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(11)91419-7
Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89(4):501-6.
doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6
Dietz HP. Ultrasound in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2019 Jan;54:12-30.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.06.006
Dietz, Hans Peter, et al. “Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of avulsion of the puborectalis muscle by tomographic ultrasound.” International urogynecology journal 22.6 (2011): 699-704.
Dietz HP. Pelvic floor ultrasound in incontinence: what’s in it for the surgeon? Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Sep;22(9):1085-97.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1402-7
Herschorn S. Female pelvic floor anatomy: the pelvic floor, supporting structures, and pelvic organs. Rev Urol 2004; 6(suppl 5):S2–S10.
pubmed: 16985905 pmcid: 1472875
Weber AM, Abrams P, Brubaker L, et al. The standardization of terminology for researchers in female pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001; 12(3):178–186.
doi: 10.1007/PL00004033
Flusberg M, Kobi M, Bahrami S, Glanc P, Palmer S, Chernyak V, Kanmaniraja D, El Sayed R. Multimodality imaging of pelvic floor anatomy. Submitted Abd Rad June 2019
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al: An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29:4-20.
doi: 10.1002/nau.20798
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al: The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175:10-7.
doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70243-0
Amin K, Lee U: Surgery for Anterior Compartment Vaginal Prolapse: Suture-Based Repair. Urol Clin North Am 46:61-70, 2019.
doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.008
Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, et al: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) - a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. J Med Life 2011; 4:75-81.
pubmed: 21505577 pmcid: 3056425
Volloyhaug I, Rojas RG, Morkved S, et al: Comparison of transperineal ultrasound with POP-Q for assessing symptoms of prolapse. Int Urogynecol J, 2019 Apr;30(4):595-602.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3722-3
Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD: Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet 369:1027-38, 2007.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60462-0
Dietz HP, Lekskulchai O: Ultrasound assessment of pelvic organ prolapse: the relationship between prolapse severity and symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:688-91, 2007.
doi: 10.1002/uog.4024
Weemhoff M, Kluivers KB, Govaert B, Evers JLH, Kessels AGH, Baeten CG. Transperineal ultrasound compared to evacuation proctography for diagnosing enteroceles and intussusceptions. InJ Colorectal Dis 2013; 28:259-353.
Li T, Shek KL, Atan IK, Rojas RG, Dietz HP. The repeatability of sonographic measures of functional pelvic floor anatomy. Int Urogynecol J 2015; 26:1667-1672.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2759-9
Dietz HP, Atat IK, Salita A. Association between ICS POP-Q coordinates and translabial ultrasound findings: implications for definition of ‘normal pelvic organ support’. Ultrasound Obsstet Cynecol 2016; 47:363-368.
doi: 10.1002/uog.14872
Staack A, Vitale J, Ragavendra N, Rodríguez LV. Translabial ultrasonography for evaluation of synthetic mesh in the vagina. Urology 2014; 83(1):68–74.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.09.004
Khatri G, Carmel ME, Bailey AA, Foreman MR, Brewington CC, Zimmern PE, et al. Postoperative imaging after surgical repair for pelvic floor dysfunction. Radiographics 2016; 36(4):1233–56.
doi: 10.1148/rg.2016150215
Rapp DE, Kobashi KC. The evolution of midurethral slings. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2008; 5(4):194–201.
doi: 10.1038/ncpuro1052
Shek KL, Dietz HP. Imaging of slings and meshes. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2015; 17(2):61-71.
doi: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2014.tb00108.x
Schuettoff S, Beyersdorff D, Gauruder-Burmester A, Tunn R. Visibility of the polypropylene tape after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure in women with stress urinary incontinence: comparison of introital ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in vitro and in vivo. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27(6):687–692.
doi: 10.1002/uog.2781
Chan L, Tse V. Pelvic floor ultrasound in the diagnosis of sling complications. World J Urol 2018 May;36(5):753-759.29.
Viragh KA, Cohen SA, Shen L, Kurzbard-Roach N, Raz S, Raman SS. Translabial US: Preoperative Detection of Midurethral Sling Erosion in Stress Urinary Incontinence. Radiology. 2018 Aug 14; 289(3):721-7.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180786
Rautenberg O, Kociszewski J, Welter J, Kuszka A, Eberhard J, Viereck V. Ultrasound and early tape mobilization--a practical solution for treating postoperative voiding dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 2014 Sep;33(7):1147-51.
doi: 10.1002/nau.22459
Kociszewski J, Fabian G, Grothey S, et al. Are complications of stress urinary incontinence surgery procedures associated with the position of the sling? Int J Urol 2017 Feb; 24(2): 145-150.
doi: 10.1111/iju.13262
Flock F, Kohorst F, Kreienberg R, Reich A. Ultrasound assessment of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT). Ultraschall Med 2011 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S35-40.
pubmed: 21080311
Kociszewski J1, Rautenberg O, Perucchini D, Eberhard J, Geissbühler V, Hilgers R, Viereck V. Tape functionality: sonographic tape characteristics and outcome after TVT incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 2008;27(6):485-90.
Chantarasorn V1, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Sonographic appearance of transobturator slings: implications for function and dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 2011 Apr;22(4):493-8.
Tamma A, et al. Sonographic sling position and cure rate 10-years after TVT- O procedure. PLoS One 2019 14(1): e0209668.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209668
Hedge A, Nogueiras M, Aguilar VC,Davila W. Dynamic assessment of sling function on transperineal ultrasound:does it correlate with outcomes 1 year following surgery?. Int Urogynecol J 2017;28:857-864.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3234-y
Takacs P, Larson K, Scott L, et al. Transperineal Sonography and Urodynamic Findings in Women With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms After Sling Placement. J Ultrasound Med 2017; 36:295–300.
doi: 10.7863/ultra.16.02076
Dresler MM, Kociszewski J, Wlaźlak E, Pędraszewski P, Trzeciak A, Surkont G. Repeatability and reproducibility of measurements of the suburethral tape location obtained in pelvic floor ultrasound performed with a transvaginal probe. J Ultrason. 2017;17(69):101–105. https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2017.0014
doi: 10.15557/JoU.2017.0014 pubmed: 28856017 pmcid: 5516079
Reich A, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of introital ultrasound after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure. Ultraschall in der Medizin. 2011 May; 32 Suppl 2(S 02):E80-85.
Gräf CM, Kupec T, Stickeler E, Goecke TW, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Najjari L. Tomographic Ultrasound Imaging to Control the Placement of Tension-Free Transobturator Tape in Female Urinary Stress Incontinence. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6495858.
doi: 10.1155/2016/6495858
Ram R, Jambhekar K, Glanc P, Steiner A, Sheridan A, Arif-Tiwari H, Palmer SL, Khatri G. Meshy Business: MR and Ultrasound Evaluation of Pelvic Floor Mesh and Slings​. Submitted, Abdominal Radiology August 2019.
Dietz HP. Pelvic Floor Ultrasound. Curr Surg Rep 2013; 1:167-181.
doi: 10.1007/s40137-013-0026-x
Burgio KL, Borello-France D, Richter HE, et al. Risk factors for fecal and urinary incontinence after childbirth: the childbirth and pelvic symptoms study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102(9):1998-2004.
doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01364.x

Auteurs

Simin Bahrami (S)

Division of Abdominal Imaging & Interventions, Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 757 Westwood Plaza Ste. # 1621, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-7437, USA. sbahrami@mednet.ucla.edu.

Gaurav Khatri (G)

Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.

Alison D Sheridan (AD)

Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Aurora, USA.

Suzanne L Palmer (SL)

Clinical Radiology and Medicine, Division Chief, Body Imaging, Keck Medical Center of USC University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.

Mark E Lockhart (ME)

Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.

Hina Arif-Tiwari (H)

Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.

Phyllis Glanc (P)

Department of Radiology, Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH