Prediction system for risk of allograft loss in patients receiving kidney transplants: international derivation and validation study.
Journal
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
ISSN: 1756-1833
Titre abrégé: BMJ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8900488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 09 2019
17 09 2019
Historique:
entrez:
19
9
2019
pubmed:
19
9
2019
medline:
27
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To develop and validate an integrative system to predict long term kidney allograft failure. International cohort study. Three cohorts including kidney transplant recipients from 10 academic medical centres from Europe and the United States. Derivation cohort: 4000 consecutive kidney recipients prospectively recruited in four French centres between 2005 and 2014. Validation cohorts: 2129 kidney recipients from three centres in Europe and 1428 from three centres in North America, recruited between 2002 and 2014. Additional validation in three randomised controlled trials (NCT01079143, EudraCT 2007-003213-13, and NCT01873157). Allograft failure (return to dialysis or pre-emptive retransplantation). 32 candidate prognostic factors for kidney allograft survival were assessed. Among the 7557 kidney transplant recipients included, 1067 (14.1%) allografts failed after a median post-transplant follow-up time of 7.12 (interquartile range 3.51-8.77) years. In the derivation cohort, eight functional, histological, and immunological prognostic factors were independently associated with allograft failure and were then combined into a risk prediction score (iBox). This score showed accurate calibration and discrimination (C index 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 0.83). The performance of the iBox was also confirmed in the validation cohorts from Europe (C index 0.81, 0.78 to 0.84) and the US (0.80, 0.76 to 0.84). The iBox system showed accuracy when assessed at different times of evaluation post-transplant, was validated in different clinical scenarios including type of immunosuppressive regimen used and response to rejection therapy, and outperformed previous risk prediction scores as well as a risk score based solely on functional parameters including estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria. Finally, the accuracy of the iBox risk score in predicting long term allograft loss was confirmed in the three randomised controlled trials. An integrative, accurate, and readily implementable risk prediction score for kidney allograft failure has been developed, which shows generalisability across centres worldwide and common clinical scenarios. The iBox risk prediction score may help to guide monitoring of patients and further improve the design and development of a valid and early surrogate endpoint for clinical trials. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03474003.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31530561
doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4923
pmc: PMC6746192
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03474003', 'NCT01079143', 'NCT01873157']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
l4923Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : KL2 TR003097
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: support as detailed above for the submitted work; AL holds shares in Cibiltech, a company that develops software; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Références
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003 Mar;14(3):773-9
pubmed: 12595515
Am J Transplant. 2003 Dec;3(12):1560-5
pubmed: 14629286
Am J Transplant. 2004 Mar;4(3):378-83
pubmed: 14961990
Transplantation. 2009 Feb 15;87(3):384-92
pubmed: 19202443
Transplantation. 2009 Jul 27;88(2):231-6
pubmed: 19623019
Am J Transplant. 2010 May;10(5):1163-6
pubmed: 20420629
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Aug;21(8):1398-406
pubmed: 20634297
Am J Transplant. 2011 Mar;11(3):450-62
pubmed: 20973913
Stat Med. 2011 Jan 15;30(1):11-21
pubmed: 21204120
Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 May;57(5):744-51
pubmed: 21349620
Am J Transplant. 2012 Feb;12(2):388-99
pubmed: 22081892
Stat Med. 2013 Jun 30;32(14):2430-42
pubmed: 23037800
Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Apr;63(4):643-51
pubmed: 24387794
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Jul;9(7):1153-5
pubmed: 24903388
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):55-63
pubmed: 25560714
Am J Transplant. 2015 May;15(5):1303-12
pubmed: 25808994
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1389-98
pubmed: 26098871
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Jan;27(1):281-92
pubmed: 26152270
Kidney Int. 2015 Nov;88(5):950-7
pubmed: 26221752
Transplantation. 2016 Feb;100(2):391-9
pubmed: 26555944
Am J Transplant. 2016 Apr;16(4):1094-101
pubmed: 26730885
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 28;374(4):333-43
pubmed: 26816011
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Oct;27(10):3165-3174
pubmed: 26961348
Stat Med. 1989 Apr;8(4):431-40
pubmed: 2727467
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 06;11(7):e0158765
pubmed: 27383068
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 3;12(7):e0180236
pubmed: 28671951
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Feb;29(2):591-605
pubmed: 29242250
Kidney Int. 2018 Nov;94(5):964-973
pubmed: 30049474
N Engl J Med. 1985 Feb 28;312(9):553-9
pubmed: 3918267
Stat Med. 1996 Feb 28;15(4):361-87
pubmed: 8668867