Clinical outcomes of an intraoperative surgical margin assessment using the fresh frozen section method in patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery - a single center analysis.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 09 2019
17 09 2019
Historique:
received:
14
08
2018
accepted:
30
08
2019
entrez:
19
9
2019
pubmed:
19
9
2019
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Breast conserving treatment (BCT) is a safe standard therapeutic method in patients with early invasive breast cancer. However, it is associated with an increased risk of residual neoplastic tissues in surgical margins. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of the use of the intraoperative pathologic analysis by the frozen section (FS) method for evaluation of the extent of the primary lumpectomy. The study concerns a retrospective analysis of a group of 1102 patients who underwent BCT between Jan 2015 and Dec 2016. The assessment focused on the frequency of the intraoperative pathologic analysis of the primary lumpectomy extent (fresh frozen section method). The influence of the BCT specimen analysis method on the free margins width, as well as the rate and the cause of reoperation were evaluated. The intraoperative lumpectomy evaluation was performed in 45.8% (505/1102) of patients (Group I), while in the remaining 54.2% of the cases it was decided to abandon this procedure (Group II). Although in 72 (14.3%) patients the intraoperative analysis gave negative results, the margins contained residual tumor tissue (vs. 16.9% in Group II). In Group I, conversion from the previously planned BCT to mastectomy was necessary in 5.9% (30/505) patients (vs. 9.7% in Group II). The duration of surgery was 48.9 ± 17.3 minutes (Group I) and 42.9 ± 13.6 minutes (Group II). In patients undergoing BCT, the use of the intraoperative pathologic analysis by the FS method resulted in a reduction of the total number of reoperations performed due to residual tumor found in the margins following the primary lumpectomy. However, it statistically significantly extended the duration of the surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31530867
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49951-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-49951-y
pmc: PMC6748937
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13441Références
Breast Cancer. 2015 May;22(3):262-8
pubmed: 23649303
Ann Oncol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1533-46
pubmed: 25939896
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Sep;130(3):609-14
pubmed: 23747837
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 1;31(31):3997-4013
pubmed: 24101045
Breast. 2014 Apr;23(2):112-9
pubmed: 24468464
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Mar 15;19(6):1688-97
pubmed: 11250998
Breast J. 2017 Jan;23(1):109-111
pubmed: 27671105
Pol J Pathol. 2017;68(1):16-25
pubmed: 28547976
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004 Apr;30(3):233-7
pubmed: 15028301
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(10):3174-83
pubmed: 26215198
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 May;42(5):631-40
pubmed: 26880017
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;21(3):717-30
pubmed: 24473640
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Mar;35(3):264-70
pubmed: 18706785
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 5;367(1):79-82
pubmed: 22762325
Scand J Surg. 2009;98(1):34-40
pubmed: 19459270
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1233-41
pubmed: 12393820
Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 15;10(16):5367-74
pubmed: 15328174
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):736-50
pubmed: 19436038
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015 Jul;10(2):170-7
pubmed: 26240616
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;113(3):256-63
pubmed: 26394558
Breast J. 2016 May;22(3):303-9
pubmed: 26854189
Lancet. 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2087-106
pubmed: 16360786
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Feb;72(2):145-9
pubmed: 23503430
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jun;163(2):287-294
pubmed: 28271310
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(Suppl 5):627-633
pubmed: 27590331
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;39(8):899-905
pubmed: 23773800
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Oct;14(10):2953-60
pubmed: 17674109
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;32(14):1502-6
pubmed: 24711553
Breast J. 2015 Jan-Feb;21(1):21-6
pubmed: 25494706
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1227-32
pubmed: 12393819