Trans-national conservation and infrastructure development in the Heart of Borneo.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
29
04
2019
accepted:
19
08
2019
entrez:
19
9
2019
pubmed:
19
9
2019
medline:
10
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Heart of Borneo initiative has promoted the integration of protected areas and sustainably-managed forests across Malaysia, Indonesia, and Brunei. Recently, however, member states of the Heart of Borneo have begun pursuing ambitious unilateral infrastructure-development schemes to accelerate economic growth, jeopardizing the underlying goal of trans-boundary integrated conservation. Focusing on Sabah, Malaysia, we highlight conflicts between its Pan-Borneo Highway scheme and the regional integration of protected areas, unprotected intact forests, and conservation-priority forests. Road developments in southern Sabah in particular would drastically reduce protected-area integration across the northern Heart of Borneo region. Such developments would separate two major clusters of protected areas that account for one-quarter of all protected areas within the Heart of Borneo complex. Sabah has proposed forest corridors and highway underpasses as means of retaining ecological connectivity in this context. Connectivity modelling identified numerous overlooked areas for connectivity rehabilitation among intact forest patches following planned road development. While such 'linear-conservation planning' might theoretically retain up to 85% of intact-forest connectivity and integrate half of the conservation-priority forests across Sabah, in reality it is very unlikely to achieve meaningful ecological integration. Moreover, such measure would be exceedingly costly if properly implemented-apparently beyond the operating budget of relevant Malaysian authorities. Unless critical road segments are cancelled, planned infrastructure will fragment important conservation landscapes with little recourse for mitigation. This likelihood reinforces earlier calls for the legal recognition of the Heart of Borneo region for conservation planning as well as for enhanced tri-lateral coordination of both conservation and development.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31532810
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221947
pii: PONE-D-19-12171
pmc: PMC6750574
doi:
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.s4m5q53']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0221947Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Science. 2001 Jan 19;291(5503):438-9
pubmed: 11228139
Ecol Appl. 2007 Sep;17(6):1771-82
pubmed: 17913139
Conserv Biol. 2008 Apr;22(2):297-307
pubmed: 18241238
Conserv Biol. 2009 Jun;23(3):548-56
pubmed: 19210301
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Dec;24(12):659-69
pubmed: 19748151
Ecology. 2011 Apr;92(4):847-58
pubmed: 21661548
Conserv Biol. 2012 Feb;26(1):1-4
pubmed: 22280321
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 17;8(7):e69679
pubmed: 23874983
Conserv Biol. 2014 Aug;28(4):889-91
pubmed: 24975570
Nature. 2014 Sep 11;513(7517):229-32
pubmed: 25162528
Nature. 2014 Dec 18;516(7531):383-6
pubmed: 25494203
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 18;9(12):e115376
pubmed: 25521297
Nat Commun. 2015 Apr 14;6:6819
pubmed: 25871635
Curr Biol. 2015 Dec 21;25(24):3202-8
pubmed: 26628009
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 23;7:12558
pubmed: 27552116
Sci Data. 2016 Aug 23;3:160067
pubmed: 27552448
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 21;11(11):e0166941
pubmed: 27870889
Ecol Indic. 2017 May;76:144-158
pubmed: 28469529
Curr Biol. 2017 Oct 23;27(20):R1130-R1140
pubmed: 29065299
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Mar;2(3):408-409
pubmed: 29335571
Biol Conserv. 2018 Mar;219:53-67
pubmed: 29503460
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 15;9(1):140
pubmed: 30644427
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 24;14(7):e0219408
pubmed: 31339902