How does urbanization affect the reproductive characteristics and ecological affinities of street plant communities?
citizen science
floral morphotypes
plant communities
pollination
reproductive traits
urbanization
Journal
Ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2045-7758
Titre abrégé: Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566408
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
07
12
2018
revised:
17
07
2019
accepted:
19
07
2019
entrez:
20
9
2019
pubmed:
20
9
2019
medline:
20
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Anthropogenic activities in urban ecosystems induce a myriad of environmental changes compared with adjacent rural areas. These environmental changes can be seen as series of abiotic and biotic selection filters affecting the distribution of plant species. What are the attributes of plant species that compose urban communities, compared with rural communities, as related to their ecological affinities (e.g., to temperature, humidity), and reproductive traits (e.g., entomophily, autogamy, floral morphology)? Using a floristic dataset from a citizen science project recording plant species growing spontaneously in the streets, we analyzed the distribution of species according to their ecological requirements and reproductive traits along an urbanization gradient in the Parisian region. We developed an original floral and pollinator typology composed of five floral and four pollinator morphotypes. The proportion of impervious areas, used as a proxy of urbanization, was measured at different spatial scales, to reveal at which spatial scales urbanization is selecting plant traits. We found significant differences in plant communities along the urbanization gradient. As expected with the warmer and drier conditions of urban areas, species with higher affinities to higher temperature, light and nutrient soil content, and lower atmospheric moisture were over-represented in urban plant communities. Interestingly, all of the significant changes in plant abiotical affinities were the most pronounced at the largest scale of analysis (1,000 m buffer radius), probably because the specific urban conditions are more pronounced when they occur on a large surface. The proportion of autogamous, self-compatible, and nonentomophilous species was significantly higher in urban plant communities, strongly suggesting a lower abundance or efficiency of the pollinating fauna in urban environments. Last, among insect-pollinated species, those with relatively long and narrow tubular corollas were disadvantaged in urban areas, possibly resulting from a reduction in pollinator abundance particularly affecting specialized plant-pollinator interactions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31534708
doi: 10.1002/ece3.5539
pii: ECE35539
pmc: PMC6745663
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
9977-9989Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared.
Références
Oecologia. 2007 Sep;153(3):589-96
pubmed: 17483965
Ambio. 2015 Apr;44(3):194-203
pubmed: 25056615
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Dec;22(12):4038-4047
pubmed: 27111238
Oecologia. 1978 Jan;36(2):223-236
pubmed: 28309130
Science. 2002 May 31;296(5573):1689-91
pubmed: 12040195
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Dec 28;283(1845):
pubmed: 28003451
PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5574
pubmed: 19440367
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45822
pubmed: 23029262
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 23;104(4):1278-82
pubmed: 17220273
Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23-35
pubmed: 4407212
Ecol Evol. 2016 Feb 24;6(7):1967-76
pubmed: 27066219
Int J Biometeorol. 2000 Aug;44(2):60-6
pubmed: 10993559
Am J Bot. 2015 Dec;102(12):1951-3
pubmed: 26620097
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jan;25(1):35-43
pubmed: 19683360
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 13;9(8):e104679
pubmed: 25118722
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 11;105(10):3796-9
pubmed: 18316722
Genetica. 2017 Dec;145(6):513-523
pubmed: 28942569
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Mar;23(3):123-30
pubmed: 18262307
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):127-35
pubmed: 19185386
PLoS One. 2013 May 22;8(5):e63421
pubmed: 23717421
Ann Bot. 2009 Jun;103(9):1471-80
pubmed: 19218577
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 22;282(1803):20142849
pubmed: 25673686
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 12;365(1539):529-43
pubmed: 20047878
Ecol Evol. 2016 Aug 25;6(18):6599-6615
pubmed: 27777733
Ecol Evol. 2019 Aug 13;9(17):9977-9989
pubmed: 31534708