Automated objective and marker-free facial grading using photographs of patients with facial palsy.
Active appearance model
Diagnostics
Facial image analysis
Facial paralysis
Grading
Random decision forest
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
26
06
2019
accepted:
11
09
2019
pubmed:
20
9
2019
medline:
19
2
2020
entrez:
20
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
An automated, objective, fast and simple classification system for the grading of facial palsy (FP) is lacking. An observational single center study was performed. 4572 photographs of 233 patients with unilateral peripheral FP were subjectively rated and automatically analyzed applying a machine learning approach including Supervised Descent Method. This allowed an automated grading of all photographs according to House-Brackmann grading scale (HB), Sunnybrook grading system (SB), and Stennert index (SI). Median time to first assessment was 6 days after onset. At first examination, the median objective HB, total SB, and total SI were grade 3, 45, and 5, respectively. The best correlation between subjective and objective grading was seen for SB and SI movement score (r = 0.746; r = 0.732, respectively). No agreement was found between subjective and objective HB grading [Test for symmetry 80.61, df = 15, p < 0.001, weighted kappa = - 0.0105; 95% confidence interval (CI) = - 0.0542 to 0.0331; p = 0.6541]. Also no agreement was found between subjective and objective total SI (test for symmetry 166.37, df = 55, p < 0.001) although there was a nonzero weighted kappa = 0.2670; CI 0.2154-0.3186; p < 0.0001). Based on a multinomial logistic regression the probability for higher scores was higher for subjective compared to objective SI (OR 1.608; CI 1.202-2.150; p = 0.0014). The best agreement was seen between subjective and objective SB (ICC = 0.34645). Automated Sunnybrook grading delivered with fair agreement fast and objective global and regional data on facial motor function for use in clinical routine and clinical trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31535292
doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05647-7
pii: 10.1007/s00405-019-05647-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3335-3343Subventions
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : 16SV7209
Références
Phys Ther. 1996 Dec;76(12):1288-98; discussion 1298-300
pubmed: 8959998
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Mar-Apr;18(2):85-6
pubmed: 26746124
Laryngoscope. 2001 Mar;111(3):387-98
pubmed: 11224766
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985 Apr;93(2):146-7
pubmed: 3921901
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Jul 1;18(4):251-7
pubmed: 27101446
Surg Innov. 2018 Feb;25(1):90-92
pubmed: 29345216
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Feb;135(2):569-579
pubmed: 25357164
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012 Jul-Aug;14(4):277-82
pubmed: 22508895
Laryngoscope. 2014 Oct;124(10):2247-51
pubmed: 24496778
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Jul 1;19(4):275-281
pubmed: 28125753
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Nov;7(11):993-1000
pubmed: 18849193
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Dec;274(12):4217-4223
pubmed: 29032419
Laryngorhinootologie. 2013 Jan;92(1):9-23
pubmed: 23065673
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 May;272(5):1259-67
pubmed: 25373838
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Feb 13;17(1):53
pubmed: 28193257
HNO. 1977 Jul;25(7):238-45
pubmed: 893151
BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 20;3(6):
pubmed: 23794548
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Feb;139(2):491e-498e
pubmed: 28121888
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Oct 21;15(10):26756-68
pubmed: 26506352
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Mar;114(3):380-6
pubmed: 8649870
N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 18;357(16):1598-607
pubmed: 17942873
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Apr;31(3):486-91
pubmed: 20042993
Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Mar;70(3):313-6
pubmed: 23241802