Delayed Enucleation With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Intraocular Unilateral Retinoblastoma: AHOPCA II, a Prospective, Multi-Institutional Protocol in Central America.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Carboplatin
/ administration & dosage
Central America
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Child
Child, Preschool
Disease Progression
Etoposide
/ administration & dosage
Eye Enucleation
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Infant
Male
Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ adverse effects
Neoplasm Staging
Progression-Free Survival
Prospective Studies
Retinal Neoplasms
/ mortality
Retinoblastoma
/ mortality
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Time-to-Treatment
Treatment Refusal
Vincristine
/ administration & dosage
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2019
01 11 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
20
9
2019
medline:
17
6
2020
entrez:
20
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Treatment abandonment because of enucleation refusal is a limitation of improving outcomes for children with retinoblastoma in countries with limited resources. Furthermore, many children present with buphthalmos and a high risk of globe rupture during enucleation. To address these unique circumstances, the AHOPCA II protocol introduced neoadjuvant chemotherapy with delayed enucleation. Patients with advanced unilateral intraocular disease (International Retinoblastoma Staging System [IRSS] stage I) were considered for upfront enucleation. Those with diffuse invasion of the choroid, postlaminar optic nerve, and/or anterior chamber invasion received six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (vincristine, carboplatin, and etoposide). Patients with buphthalmos and those with a perceived risk for enucleation refusal and/or abandonment were given two to three cycles of chemotherapy before scheduled enucleation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy to complete six cycles, regardless of pathology. A total of 161 patients had unilateral IRSS stage I disease; 102 underwent upfront enucleation, and 59 had delayed enucleation. The estimated 5-year abandonment-sensitive event-free and overall survival rates for the group were 0.81 ± 0.03 and 0.86 ± 0.03, respectively. The 5-year estimated abandonment-sensitive event-free survival rates for patients undergoing upfront and delayed enucleation were 0.89 ± 0.03 and 0.68 ± 0.06, respectively ( AHOPCA describes the results of advanced intraocular retinoblastoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In eyes with buphthalmos and patients with risk of abandonment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be effective when followed by enucleation and adjuvant chemotherapy. Our study suggests that this approach can save patients with buphthalmos from ocular rupture and might reduce refusal of enucleation and abandonment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31536438
doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00141
pmc: PMC6823891
doi:
Substances chimiques
Vincristine
5J49Q6B70F
Etoposide
6PLQ3CP4P3
Carboplatin
BG3F62OND5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2875-2882Références
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 13;11(10):e0163090
pubmed: 27736871
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008 Jan;50(1):160-2
pubmed: 17120241
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006 Nov;47(6):801-5
pubmed: 16358310
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2009 May;31(5):325-9
pubmed: 19415010
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Apr;58(4):545-50
pubmed: 21910211
Pediatrics. 2008 Sep;122(3):e763-70
pubmed: 18762512
Ophthalmology. 2013 May;120(5):997-1003
pubmed: 23399379
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Mar;2(3):e143
pubmed: 25102845
Cancer. 2013 Feb 15;119(4):871-9
pubmed: 22972687
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;100(2):172-8
pubmed: 26061162
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Apr;48(4):486-90
pubmed: 16883600
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;183:251-6
pubmed: 23388293
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0135230
pubmed: 26422208
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008 Oct;51(4):479-84
pubmed: 18478574
Ophthalmology. 2007 Nov;114(11):2083-9
pubmed: 17459482
Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Aug;88(8):1069-73
pubmed: 15258027
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014 Aug;36(6):e335-40
pubmed: 24577551
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;99(7):949-53
pubmed: 25583279
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Feb;61(2):345-54
pubmed: 24376230
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 1;29(7):845-51
pubmed: 21282531
Ann Oncol. 2004 Apr;15(4):680-5
pubmed: 15033679
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2004 Jan-Feb;21(1):37-48
pubmed: 14660305
Br J Ophthalmol. 1993 Sep;77(9):544-8
pubmed: 8218048
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Nov;49(6):817-9
pubmed: 17009236
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul 1;136(7):747-752
pubmed: 29799944
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Feb;80(2):171-4
pubmed: 10325735
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Dec;64 Suppl 5:
pubmed: 29297619
Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Mar;87(3):327-9
pubmed: 12598448
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 May;44(5):455-60
pubmed: 15558702
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Aug;12(8):719-20
pubmed: 21719348
Br Med Bull. 1996 Oct;52(4):682-703
pubmed: 9039726
Cancer. 2017 Feb 1;123(3):436-448
pubmed: 27683100
Ophthalmic Genet. 2009 Mar;30(1):31-6
pubmed: 19172508
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013 May;60(5):719-27
pubmed: 23335388
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct-Dec;21(4):321-7
pubmed: 25371638
Ophthalmology. 2015 Jun;122(6):1165-72
pubmed: 25841975
Ophthalmic Genet. 2016 Jun;37(2):137-43
pubmed: 25078476
Cancer. 1994 Feb 1;73(3):692-8
pubmed: 8299091