Oral dosing for antenatal corticosteroids in the Rhesus macaque.
Administration, Oral
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
/ administration & dosage
Animals
Betamethasone
/ administration & dosage
Dexamethasone
/ administration & dosage
Female
Fetal Organ Maturity
/ drug effects
Gene Expression Profiling
/ methods
Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
/ drug effects
Hippocampus
/ drug effects
Humans
Injections, Intramuscular
Liver
/ drug effects
Lung
/ drug effects
Macaca mulatta
Models, Animal
Pregnancy
Premature Birth
/ genetics
Prenatal Care
/ methods
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
16
05
2019
accepted:
06
09
2019
entrez:
20
9
2019
pubmed:
20
9
2019
medline:
24
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) are standard of care for women at risk of preterm delivery, although choice of drug, dose or route have not been systematically evaluated. Further, ACS are infrequently used in low resource environments where most of the mortality from prematurity occurs. We report proof of principle experiments to test betamethasone-phosphate (Beta-P) or dexamethasone-phosphate (Dex-P) given orally in comparison to the clinical treatment with the intramuscular combination drug beta-phosphate plus beta-acetate in a Rhesus Macaque model. First, we performed pharmacokinetic studies in non-pregnant monkeys to compare blood levels of the steroids using oral dosing with Beta-P, Dex-P and an effective maternal intramuscular dose of the beta-acetate component of the clinical treatment. We then evaluated maternal and fetal blood steroid levels with limited fetal sampling under ultrasound guidance in pregnant macaques. We found that oral Beta is more slowly cleared from plasma than oral Dex. The blood levels of both drugs were lower in maternal plasma of pregnant than in non-pregnant macaques. Using the pharmacokinetic data, we treated groups of 6-8 pregnant monkeys with oral Beta-P, oral Dex-P, or the maternal intramuscular clinical treatment and saline controls and measured pressure-volume curves to assess corticosteroid effects on lung maturation at 5d. Oral Beta-P improved the pressure-volume curves similarly to the clinical treatment. Oral Dex-P gave more variable and nonsignificant responses. We then compared gene expression in the fetal lung, liver and hippocampus between oral Beta-P and the clinical treatment by RNA-sequencing. The transcriptomes were largely similar with small gene expression differences in the lung and liver, and no differences in the hippocampus between the groups. As proof of principle, ACS therapy can be effective using inexpensive and widely available oral drugs. Clinical dosing strategies must carefully consider the pharmacokinetics of oral Beta-P or Dex-P to minimize fetal exposure while achieving the desired treatment responses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31536601
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222817
pii: PONE-D-19-13424
pmc: PMC6752828
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
0
dexamethasone 21-phosphate
2BP70L44PR
betamethasone sodium phosphate
7BK02SCL3W
Dexamethasone
7S5I7G3JQL
Betamethasone
9842X06Q6M
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0222817Subventions
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : P51 OD011107
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Am J Physiol. 1999 Dec;277(6):L1142-8
pubmed: 10600884
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Nov;162(5):1656-61
pubmed: 11069792
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD004454
pubmed: 16856047
Genome Biol. 2010;11(10):R106
pubmed: 20979621
Clin Ther. 2011 Nov;33(11):1831-41
pubmed: 22047811
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 29;(8):CD006764
pubmed: 23990333
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):629-639
pubmed: 25458726
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2015 Sep 03;51:11.14.1-19
pubmed: 26334920
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 7;374(14):1311-20
pubmed: 26842679
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W83-9
pubmed: 27098042
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;215(6):775.e1-775.e12
pubmed: 27555319
J Infect Dis. 2016 Nov 15;214(10):1597-1604
pubmed: 27601620
Lancet. 2017 Jul 8;390(10090):169-177
pubmed: 28077232
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 21;3:CD004454
pubmed: 28321847
BMJ. 2017 Apr 12;357:j1415
pubmed: 28404617
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Aug 30;2(3):e000398
pubmed: 29082019
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):132.e1-132.e9
pubmed: 29138038
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;219(1):62-74
pubmed: 29630886
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2018 Oct 1;315(4):R825-R839
pubmed: 29641233
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;219(3):301.e1-301.e16
pubmed: 29758177
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jul;106(1):164-173
pubmed: 30924921
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 21;9(1):9039
pubmed: 31227752
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Jun 27;7(2):215-227
pubmed: 31249020
Pediatr Res. 2019 Jul 31;:null
pubmed: 31365919
Pediatrics. 1972 Oct;50(4):515-25
pubmed: 4561295
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jul;173(1):254-62
pubmed: 7631700
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996 Mar;75(3):213-6
pubmed: 8607331
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Feb;89(2):276-80
pubmed: 9015035
Pediatrics. 1998 Nov;102(5):1116-25
pubmed: 9794943
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Nov;179(5):1120-3
pubmed: 9822485
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Nov;179(5):1124-7
pubmed: 9822486