STELO: a new tool for family physicians for the correct identification of inherited cancer syndromes.
breast cancer
colorectal cancer
family health
genetics
genomics
prevention
Journal
Family practice
ISSN: 1460-2229
Titre abrégé: Fam Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8500875
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 02 2020
19 02 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
20
9
2019
medline:
29
4
2021
entrez:
20
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The hereditary cancer syndromes represent overall <10% of all cancers. These syndromes are not irrelevant for public health because all the cancers typical of these syndromes affected young people and many members of the same family and the cancers are more aggressive than the sporadic ones and need specific surgery and medical therapy. We developed a new family assessment tool: STELO designed for family physicians to identify patients could benefit from Cancer Genetic Counselling. Test the sensitivity and specificity of a new assessment tool for the correct identification of inherited cancer syndromes. Retrospectively we tested the new tool on a subset of patients who had already undergone genetic counselling at the Cancer Genetic Counselling Service of ASST (Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale) Settelaghi Varese, to investigate sensitivity, specificity and applicability of this new tool in routine genetic screening. STELO responses were matched against the opinion of two cancer geneticists (i.e. gold standard) who blinded each other decided if the history of these patients was properly suspected as a hereditary cancer syndrome. The Genetic Counselling Service followed 546 subjects from 2014 to 2015. STELO tool was tested retrospectively on these clinical records and resulted positive in 418 cases, out of 546 (76.5%). STELO reported, towards the gold standard, 88.5% and 52.3% of sensitivity and specificity, respectively. STELO has demonstrated to have a good sensitivity. The specificity was expectedly low given that STELO has been developed for general medicine, so it needs to be simple, practical, of rapid consultation and effectively used in clinical practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The hereditary cancer syndromes represent overall <10% of all cancers. These syndromes are not irrelevant for public health because all the cancers typical of these syndromes affected young people and many members of the same family and the cancers are more aggressive than the sporadic ones and need specific surgery and medical therapy. We developed a new family assessment tool: STELO designed for family physicians to identify patients could benefit from Cancer Genetic Counselling.
OBJECTIVE
Test the sensitivity and specificity of a new assessment tool for the correct identification of inherited cancer syndromes.
METHODS
Retrospectively we tested the new tool on a subset of patients who had already undergone genetic counselling at the Cancer Genetic Counselling Service of ASST (Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale) Settelaghi Varese, to investigate sensitivity, specificity and applicability of this new tool in routine genetic screening. STELO responses were matched against the opinion of two cancer geneticists (i.e. gold standard) who blinded each other decided if the history of these patients was properly suspected as a hereditary cancer syndrome.
RESULTS
The Genetic Counselling Service followed 546 subjects from 2014 to 2015. STELO tool was tested retrospectively on these clinical records and resulted positive in 418 cases, out of 546 (76.5%). STELO reported, towards the gold standard, 88.5% and 52.3% of sensitivity and specificity, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
STELO has demonstrated to have a good sensitivity. The specificity was expectedly low given that STELO has been developed for general medicine, so it needs to be simple, practical, of rapid consultation and effectively used in clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31536618
pii: 5571819
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz045
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
43-48Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.