Aortic intima-media thickness can be used to determine target organ damage in adult patients with coronary artery disease risk factors.
coronary artery disease risk factors
intima-media thickness
thoracic and abdominal aorta
Journal
Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases
ISSN: 2451-0629
Titre abrégé: Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101701205
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
22
06
2019
accepted:
01
07
2019
entrez:
21
9
2019
pubmed:
21
9
2019
medline:
21
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We aimed to evaluate the relationship between abdominal aortic intima-media thickness (AA-IMT) and thoracic aortic intima-media thickness (TA-IMT) values and to investigate their relationship with common carotid intima-media thickness (CC-IMT) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors. This study included 100 patients who underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examination for different reasons with at least one CAD risk factor. CC-IMT, AA-IMT, and TA-IMT values were measured. Patients with CC-IMT > 0.9 mm were considered as having increased CC-IMT. Patients were divided into two groups with and without increased CC-IMT. Mean AA-IMT and TA-IMT values of all patients were 1.55 ±0.27 mm and 1.39 ±0.25 mm, respectively. In patients with increased CC-IMT, blood pressure, hyperlipidemia and hypertension frequency, creatinine, total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglyceride, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and uric acid levels, AA-IMT and TA-IMT values were higher, while the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level was lower than the normal CC-IMT group. AA-IMT, systolic blood pressure (SBP), total and HDL cholesterol levels independently determined the patients with CC-IMT > 0.9 mm. Each 0.1 mm increase in AA-IMT value was found to increase the probability of having CC-IMT > 0.9 mm. In addition, linear regression analysis showed that CC-IMT was closely and independently related to AA-IMT ( The AA-IMT value was found to be higher than TA-IMT in the same patient. Also it was found that AA-IMT was more closely related to CC-IMT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31538122
doi: 10.5114/amsad.2019.87002
pii: 37356
pmc: PMC6747883
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e183-e190Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Circulation. 2001 Dec 11;104(24):2943-7
pubmed: 11739310
Virchows Arch. 2002 Sep;441(3):279-88
pubmed: 12242525
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 May;33(5):592-8
pubmed: 17164093
Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Aug 1;134(3):250-6
pubmed: 1877584
J Pediatr. 2010 Feb;156(2):237-41
pubmed: 19853860
Int Angiol. 2013 Jun;32(3):349-53
pubmed: 23711688
Eur Heart J. 2013 Oct;34(39):3035-87
pubmed: 23996285
Acta Paediatr. 2014 Feb;103(2):124-30
pubmed: 24117658
J Clin Ultrasound. 2014 Oct;42(8):475-80
pubmed: 24990226
Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug 1;37(29):2315-2381
pubmed: 27222591
Eur Heart J. 2016 Oct 14;37(39):2999-3058
pubmed: 27567407
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018 May;38(3):396-401
pubmed: 28444941
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 May;19(3):450-456
pubmed: 28664608
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2018 Oct;45(4):597-603
pubmed: 29536281
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2018 Jun 12;16(1):8
pubmed: 29891012
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2019 Jun;127(6):387-395
pubmed: 30107624
Angiology. 2019 Jul;70(6):561-566
pubmed: 30114948
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104
pubmed: 30165516
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2019 Jun;47(4):301-311
pubmed: 31219455
Yonsei Med J. 1963;4:37-42
pubmed: 5889897
Am Heart J. 1994 Feb;127(2):336-44
pubmed: 8296702
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jun 4;338(23):1650-6
pubmed: 9614255