[Computational psychiatry : Data-driven vs. mechanistic approaches].
Computationale Psychiatrie : Datengetriebene vs. mechanistische Ansätze.
Addictive disorders
Cognitive neurosciences
Dynamic causal modelling
Reinforcement learning
Schizophrenia
Journal
Der Nervenarzt
ISSN: 1433-0407
Titre abrégé: Nervenarzt
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0400773
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
21
9
2019
medline:
21
11
2019
entrez:
21
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The emerging research field of so-called computational psychiatry attempts to contribute to an understanding of complex psychiatric phenomena by applying computational methods and to promote the translation of neuroscientific research results into clinical practice. This article presents this field of research using selected examples based on the distinction between data-driven and theory-driven approaches. Exemplary for a data-driven approach are studies to predict clinical outcome, for example, in persons with a high-risk state for psychosis or on the response to pharmacological treatment for depression. Theory-driven approaches attempt to describe the mechanisms of altered information processing as the cause of psychiatric symptoms at the behavioral and neuronal level. In computational models possible mechanisms can be described that may have produced the measured behavioral or neuronal data. For example, in schizophrenia patients the clinical phenomenon of aberrant salience has been described as learning irrelevant information or cognitive deficits have been linked to connectivity changes in frontoparietal networks. Computational psychiatry can make important contributions to the prediction of individual clinical courses as well as to a mechanistic understanding of psychiatric symptoms. For this a further development of reliable and valid methods across different disciplines is indispensable.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31538209
doi: 10.1007/s00115-019-00796-w
pii: 10.1007/s00115-019-00796-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1117-1124Références
Addict Biol. 2016 May;21(3):719-31
pubmed: 25828702
J Neurosci. 2012 Jan 4;32(1):12-20
pubmed: 22219266
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan;16(1):72-80
pubmed: 22177032
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 1;82(11):847-856
pubmed: 28673442
Brain. 2017 Apr 1;140(4):1147-1157
pubmed: 28334960
Neuroimage. 2014 Apr 1;89:171-80
pubmed: 24291614
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Aug 10;14(8):e1006319
pubmed: 30096179
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;3(3):243-50
pubmed: 26803397
Elife. 2016 Mar 01;5:null
pubmed: 26928075
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2018 May;9(3):e1460
pubmed: 29369526
Neuron. 2015 Aug 19;87(4):716-32
pubmed: 26291157
Lancet Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;1(2):148-58
pubmed: 26360579
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 1;76(6):563-564
pubmed: 31017638
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Mar;19(3):404-13
pubmed: 26906507
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2019 Jan 18;44(3):195-204
pubmed: 30657658
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 11;10(1):1096
pubmed: 30858366
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Feb;14(2):154-62
pubmed: 21270784
Mol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;20(3):345-52
pubmed: 24840709
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 19;116(12):5472-5477
pubmed: 30842284
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Jul 1;27(7):3832-3841
pubmed: 28334138
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016 Sep;1(5):382-385
pubmed: 29560868
Neuroimage Clin. 2013 Nov 16;4:98-111
pubmed: 24363992
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;72(12):1243-51
pubmed: 26558708
Science. 1997 Mar 14;275(5306):1593-9
pubmed: 9054347
J Neurosci. 2016 Oct 26;36(43):10935-10948
pubmed: 27798176
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 1;75(11):1156-1172
pubmed: 30267047
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 15;49(4):3099-109
pubmed: 19914382
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;70(9):903-12
pubmed: 23824230