Real-world outcomes of non-responding diabetic macular edema treated with continued anti-VEGF therapy versus early switch to dexamethasone implant: 2-year results.
Aged
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Bevacizumab
/ administration & dosage
Dexamethasone
/ administration & dosage
Diabetic Retinopathy
/ drug therapy
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug Implants
Drug Resistance
/ drug effects
Drug Substitution
Female
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Macular Edema
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Visual Acuity
/ drug effects
Anti-VEGF therapy
Dexamethasone implant
Intravitreal therapy
Long-term outcome
Refractory diabetic macular edema
Journal
Acta diabetologica
ISSN: 1432-5233
Titre abrégé: Acta Diabetol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9200299
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
20
06
2019
accepted:
27
08
2019
pubmed:
22
9
2019
medline:
14
1
2020
entrez:
22
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To provide 2-year follow-up data on eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) that were non-responsive after three initial anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections, comparing functional and anatomical outcomes under continued anti-VEGF therapy versus dexamethasone (DEX) implant. Multicenter, retrospective chart review comparing eyes with treatment-naïve DME and a suboptimal response to a loading phase of anti-VEGF therapy (3 injections given monthly) which were then treated with (a) further anti-VEGF (n = 72) or (b) initially switched to DEX implant (n = 38). Main outcome measures were change in visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST) from the end of the loading phase to 24 months. In 79% of the 12-month study population (87/110 eyes), 24-month data were available. One quarter of eyes in each group switched treatments during the second year. Eyes that were switched early to DEX implant maintained the functional and anatomical improvements at 24 months which were seen in the first year (from month 3: + 8.9 letters, - 214 µm). Eyes that were switched from anti-VEGF therapy to steroids in the second year improved VA and reduced CST at 24 months (from month 12: + 6.8 letters, p = 0.023; - 226 µm, p = 0.004). In eyes continued on anti-VEGF therapy, VA and CST were stable at 24 months (from month 3: + 2.8 letters, p = 0.254; - 24 µm, p = 0.243). Eyes that were non-responsive to anti-VEGF therapy for 12 months had similar chances to experience a VA gain from further therapy as eyes that were non-responsive for 3 months only (23.8 vs. 31.0%, p = 0.344). The beneficial effect of an early switch to DEX implant in DME non-responders seen at month 12 was maintained during the second year. A later switch from anti-VEGF to steroids still provided significant improvement. Eyes continued on anti-VEGF over a period of 24 months maintained vision. A quarter of eyes, which had not improved vision at 12 months, exhibited a delayed response to treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31541334
doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01416-4
pii: 10.1007/s00592-019-01416-4
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Drug Implants
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Dexamethasone
7S5I7G3JQL
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM