Pedagogical principles and methods underpinning education of health and social care practitioners on experiences and needs of older LGBT+ people: Findings from a systematic review.

Ageing Bisexual Curriculum Descriptive thematic review Gay Health practitioner LGBT + ageing Lesbian Pedagogy Social care Transgender

Journal

Nurse education in practice
ISSN: 1873-5223
Titre abrégé: Nurse Educ Pract
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101090848

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 14 09 2018
revised: 29 07 2019
accepted: 06 09 2019
pubmed: 22 9 2019
medline: 16 4 2020
entrez: 22 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is a growing awareness of the need for LGBT + competency training to ensure that the health and social care services offered to older LGBT + people is affirmative and gender sensitive. To conduct a synthesis of the literature that describes the pedagogical principles, curriculum content and methods (teaching and assessment) used to educate health and social care practitioners on the experiences and needs of older LGBT + people. Systematic thematic review of literature. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science, Social Sciences Index, ERIC. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, this review examined peer-reviewed papers published in English, prior to April 2018 that addressed pedagogical and curriculum issues on the inclusion of needs and experiences of older LGBT + people. The combined searches yielded 2214 papers of which 17 papers were eligible for inclusion, 10 discussion papers and 7 evaluation studies. Analysis identified the following themes: i) Acknowledging the wider historical context of older LGBT + people's lives; ii) Recognising that older LGBT + people are not a homogenous group; iii) Incorporating a multitude of theories and models from different perspectives; iv) Alerting practitioners to the health issues and disparities facing older LGBT + people; v) Including content that supports inclusive care for older LGBT + people; vi) Addressing barriers to older LGBT + people accessing health care; vii) Interactive activities are the preferred pedagogical strategy; viii) Involving older LGBT + people in curriculum development is a core principle; and ix) Mandatory education is not always the solution. As the field matures there is a need for more exploration of curriculum principles, assessment strategies and strategies to overcome barriers to the inclusion of issues experienced by older LGBT + people within curricula.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
There is a growing awareness of the need for LGBT + competency training to ensure that the health and social care services offered to older LGBT + people is affirmative and gender sensitive.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To conduct a synthesis of the literature that describes the pedagogical principles, curriculum content and methods (teaching and assessment) used to educate health and social care practitioners on the experiences and needs of older LGBT + people.
DESIGN METHODS
Systematic thematic review of literature.
DATA SOURCES METHODS
MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science, Social Sciences Index, ERIC.
METHOD METHODS
In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, this review examined peer-reviewed papers published in English, prior to April 2018 that addressed pedagogical and curriculum issues on the inclusion of needs and experiences of older LGBT + people.
RESULTS RESULTS
The combined searches yielded 2214 papers of which 17 papers were eligible for inclusion, 10 discussion papers and 7 evaluation studies. Analysis identified the following themes: i) Acknowledging the wider historical context of older LGBT + people's lives; ii) Recognising that older LGBT + people are not a homogenous group; iii) Incorporating a multitude of theories and models from different perspectives; iv) Alerting practitioners to the health issues and disparities facing older LGBT + people; v) Including content that supports inclusive care for older LGBT + people; vi) Addressing barriers to older LGBT + people accessing health care; vii) Interactive activities are the preferred pedagogical strategy; viii) Involving older LGBT + people in curriculum development is a core principle; and ix) Mandatory education is not always the solution.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
As the field matures there is a need for more exploration of curriculum principles, assessment strategies and strategies to overcome barriers to the inclusion of issues experienced by older LGBT + people within curricula.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31541934
pii: S1471-5953(18)30815-1
doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102625
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102625

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Agnes Higgins (A)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: ahiggins@tcd.ie.

Carmel Downes (C)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: cadownes@tcd.ie.

Greg Sheaf (G)

Library, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: greg.sheaf@tcd.ie.

Elisa Bus (E)

Stichting Nationaal Ouderenfonds, Amersfoort, NL, the Netherlands. Electronic address: e.bus@ouderenfonds.nl.

Sandra Connell (S)

School of Health and Education, Middlesex University, London UK. Electronic address: s.connell@mdx.ac.uk.

Trish Hafford-Letchfield (T)

School of Health and Education, Middlesex University, London UK. Electronic address: trish.hafford-letchfield@strath.ac.uk.

Anže Jurček (A)

Faculty of Social Work, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. Electronic address: anze.jurcek@fsd.uni-lj.si.

Alfonso Pezzella (A)

School of Health and Education, Middlesex University, London UK. Electronic address: a.pezzella@mdx.ac.uk.

Irma Rabelink (I)

Consortium Beroepsonderwijs, Amersfoort, NL, the Netherlands. Electronic address: irabelink@consortiumbo.nl.

George Robotham (G)

Outhouse LGBT Community Resource Centre, 105 Capel Street, Dublin Ireland. Electronic address: georgerobotham@gmail.com.

Mojca Urek (M)

Faculty of Social Work, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. Electronic address: Mojca.Urek@fsd.uni-lj.si.

Nina van der Vaart (N)

Stichting Nationaal Ouderenfonds, Amersfoort, NL, the Netherlands. Electronic address: n.vandervaart@ouderenfonds.nl.

Brian Keogh (B)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: keoghbj@tcd.ie.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH