Outcome after pancreatectomy for neuroendocrine neoplams according to the WHO 2017 grading system: A retrospective multicentric analysis of 138 consecutive patients.
Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Databases, Factual
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Humans
Male
Margins of Excision
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
/ methods
Neuroendocrine Tumors
/ mortality
Pancreatectomy
/ mortality
Pancreatic Neoplasms
/ mortality
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
World Health Organization
Young Adult
Neuroendocrine tumor
Pancreas
Pancreatectomy
Postoperative outcome
Surgery
Journal
Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology
ISSN: 2210-741X
Titre abrégé: Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101553659
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
26
06
2019
revised:
23
07
2019
accepted:
16
08
2019
pubmed:
24
9
2019
medline:
9
9
2021
entrez:
24
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate the new World Health Organization (WHO) 2017 grading system and the others clinicopathological factors in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (panNET) operated patients. Histological staging was based on the WHO 2017 grading system. Outcome after surgery and predictors of overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were evaluated. A total of 138 patients underwent surgical resection with a severe morbidity and mortality rates of 14.5% and 0.7% respectively. Five years OS differed according to WHO 2017: 95% among 58 patients with NETG1, 82% in 68 patients with NETG2, 35% in 7 patients with NETG3 and 0% in 5 patients with NECG3 (P<0.0001). Independent predictors of worse OS were age>60 y.o (P=0.014), synchronous metastasis (P=0.005) and WHO 2017 with significant differences between NETG1 versus NETG2 (P=0.005), NETG3 (P<0.001) and NECG3 (P<0.001). Independent predictors of worse DFS were symptomatic NET (P=0.038), pN+ status (P=0.027) and WHO 2017 with significant differences between NETG1 versus NETG3 (P=0.014) and NECG3 (P=0.009). The WHO 2017 grading system is a useful tool for patient prognosis after panNET resection and the tailoring of therapeutic strategy. Surgery could provide good results in NETG3 patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31543336
pii: S2210-7401(19)30194-9
doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2019.08.010
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
286-294Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.