Sugarcane Omics: An Update on the Current Status of Research and Crop Improvement.
biotic and abiotic stresses
crop improvement and development
omics approaches
sugarcane
Journal
Plants (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2223-7747
Titre abrégé: Plants (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101596181
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Sep 2019
12 Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
26
06
2019
revised:
08
08
2019
accepted:
20
08
2019
entrez:
25
9
2019
pubmed:
25
9
2019
medline:
25
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sugarcane is an important crop from Poaceae family, contributing about 80% of the total world's sucrose with an annual value of around US$150 billion. In addition, sugarcane is utilized as a raw material for the production of bioethanol, which is an alternate source of renewable energy. Moving towards sugarcane omics, a remarkable success has been achieved in gene transfer from a wide variety of plant and non-plant sources to sugarcane, with the accessibility of efficient transformation systems, selectable marker genes, and genetic engineering gears. Genetic engineering techniques make possible to clone and characterize useful genes and also to improve commercially important traits in elite sugarcane clones that subsequently lead to the development of an ideal cultivar. Sugarcane is a complex polyploidy crop, and hence no single technique has been found to be the best for the confirmation of polygenic and phenotypic characteristics. To better understand the application of basic omics in sugarcane regarding agronomic characters and industrial quality traits as well as responses to diverse biotic and abiotic stresses, it is important to explore the physiology, genome structure, functional integrity, and collinearity of sugarcane with other more or less similar crops/plants. Genetic improvements in this crop are hampered by its complex genome, low fertility ratio, longer production cycle, and susceptibility to several biotic and abiotic stresses. Biotechnology interventions are expected to pave the way for addressing these obstacles and improving sugarcane crop. Thus, this review article highlights up to date information with respect to how advanced data of omics (genomics, transcriptomic, proteomics and metabolomics) can be employed to improve sugarcane crops.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31547331
pii: plants8090344
doi: 10.3390/plants8090344
pmc: PMC6784093
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System
ID : CARS-170302
Références
PLoS One. 2015 May 08;10(5):e0126306
pubmed: 25955765
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2015 May;17(3):608-17
pubmed: 25311688
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):1683
pubmed: 29374206
Arch Biochem Biophys. 2005 Dec 15;444(2):139-58
pubmed: 16309626
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 18;12(4):e0176076
pubmed: 28419154
Genome Res. 2003 Dec;13(12):2725-35
pubmed: 14613979
Plant Dis. 2016 Dec;100(12):2499-2506
pubmed: 30686166
Plant Cell. 2011 Mar;23(3):1000-13
pubmed: 21447791
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 28;6:37434
pubmed: 27892480
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 11;9(2):e88462
pubmed: 24523899
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 07;7:41922
pubmed: 28167824
J Plant Physiol. 2006 May;163(7):723-30
pubmed: 16616583
Plant Biotechnol J. 2010 Apr;8(3):263-76
pubmed: 20388126
Mol Gen Genet. 1996 Mar 7;250(4):405-13
pubmed: 8602157
Plant Cell Physiol. 2007 Apr;48(4):573-84
pubmed: 17327259
Nat Genet. 2018 Nov;50(11):1565-1573
pubmed: 30297971
BMC Microbiol. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):2
pubmed: 30616519
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 23;9(1):395
pubmed: 30674931
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2013 Jul;19(3):307-21
pubmed: 24431500
Genome Biol Evol. 2017 Feb 1;9(2):266-278
pubmed: 28082603
Genet Mol Res. 2015 Jun 29;14(2):7196-207
pubmed: 26125930
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 07;7:43364
pubmed: 28266527
Physiol Plant. 2008 Feb;132(2):117-35
pubmed: 18251855
Plant Signal Behav. 2016;11(1):e1117723
pubmed: 26636625
Phytopathology. 2019 Apr;109(4):623-631
pubmed: 30277119
Front Plant Sci. 2017 May 31;8:882
pubmed: 28620397
Plant Biotechnol J. 2019 Jan;17(1):264-274
pubmed: 29878497
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 11;12(12):e0189271
pubmed: 29228055
Plant J. 2005 Dec;44(5):707-17
pubmed: 16297064
Plant Cell Rep. 2020 Jul;39(7):873-889
pubmed: 32314046
BMC Plant Biol. 2019 May 23;19(1):215
pubmed: 31122198
Nature. 2009 Jan 29;457(7229):551-6
pubmed: 19189423
Funct Plant Biol. 2016 Jun;43(6):523-533
pubmed: 32480482
BMC Plant Biol. 2019 Jun 28;19(1):285
pubmed: 31253103
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 2;8(1):11612
pubmed: 30072760
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0166473
pubmed: 27936012
BMC Genomics. 2016 Mar 05;17:195
pubmed: 26946183
Plant Cell Physiol. 2002 Mar;43(3):350-4
pubmed: 11917090
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0206716
pubmed: 30586361
Protoplasma. 2016 May;253(3):803-813
pubmed: 26043840
PeerJ. 2018 Sep 5;6:e5445
pubmed: 30202643
Plant Cell Rep. 2015 Feb;34(2):247-63
pubmed: 25477204
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013 Feb;24(1):22-30
pubmed: 23020966
Proteomics. 2015 May;15(10):1658-70
pubmed: 25641866
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 6;9(1):2638
pubmed: 29980662
BMC Genomics. 2010 Apr 23;11:261
pubmed: 20416060
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2019 Jan;25(1):207-220
pubmed: 30804643
Proteomics. 2018 Jan;18(2):
pubmed: 29274249
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014 Sep;406(24):5997-6005
pubmed: 25012359
Electrophoresis. 2010 Jun;31(12):1959-74
pubmed: 20564692
Gene. 2018 Dec 15;678:207-218
pubmed: 30099025
J Proteomics. 2016 Jan 01;130:170-9
pubmed: 26435420
BMC Genomics. 2016 Oct 12;17(1):800
pubmed: 27733120
J Plant Physiol. 2015 Apr 1;177:93-99
pubmed: 25703773
Gene. 2017 Oct 30;633:17-27
pubmed: 28855118
Mol Biol Rep. 2019 Aug;46(4):3777-3789
pubmed: 31006101
J Exp Bot. 2003 Jan;54(382):533-7
pubmed: 12508064
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 20;6:29692
pubmed: 27434999
3 Biotech. 2018 Apr;8(4):195
pubmed: 29581927
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 30;7:12423
pubmed: 27571918
Theor Appl Genet. 2004 Mar;108(5):851-63
pubmed: 14647901
Mol Genet Genomics. 2004 Sep;272(2):194-203
pubmed: 15338280
J Plant Physiol. 2018 Apr;223:9-18
pubmed: 29433084
Phytochemistry. 2003 Mar;62(6):817-36
pubmed: 12590110
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 02;7:43766
pubmed: 28252053
BMC Genomics. 2014 Jun 30;15:540
pubmed: 24984568
Phytopathology. 2018 Dec;108(12):1455-1466
pubmed: 29969065
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jun 25;9:857
pubmed: 29988592
Plant Cell. 2015 Jun;27(6):1771-87
pubmed: 26059204
Nat Rev Genet. 2017 Feb;18(2):71-86
pubmed: 27867194
Proteomics. 2016 Apr;16(7):1111-22
pubmed: 26857420
BMC Plant Biol. 2018 Oct 20;18(1):250
pubmed: 30342477
Comp Funct Genomics. 2011;2011:989016
pubmed: 21822403
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 03;9(6):e98463
pubmed: 24893295
J Biol Res (Thessalon). 2016 Aug 08;23:19
pubmed: 27508170
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jan 29;20(3):
pubmed: 30699953
BMC Plant Biol. 2016 Jan 11;16:14
pubmed: 26754199
J Proteome Res. 2013 Dec 6;12(12):5681-95
pubmed: 24251627
PLoS One. 2015 May 04;10(5):e0125810
pubmed: 25938773
BMC Plant Biol. 2015 Dec 29;15:300
pubmed: 26714767
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 15;9(9):e107351
pubmed: 25222706
Nat Commun. 2016 Jun 24;7:11708
pubmed: 27339440
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0191081
pubmed: 29324804
3 Biotech. 2018 Oct;8(10):418
pubmed: 30237965
BMC Plant Biol. 2019 Apr 25;19(1):160
pubmed: 31023213
Proteomics. 2014 Mar;14(6):738-49
pubmed: 24436144
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0219843
pubmed: 31318931
Trop Plant Biol. 2012 Sep;5(3):233-243
pubmed: 22905278
PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0197840
pubmed: 29795614
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Jun 18;4:201
pubmed: 23785381
Proteomics. 2019 Jul;19(14):e1900004
pubmed: 31172662
Trends Genet. 2013 Jan;29(1):41-50
pubmed: 23084137
J Proteome Res. 2017 Oct 6;16(10):3688-3703
pubmed: 28836437
Molecules. 2019 Mar 07;24(5):
pubmed: 30866484
Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1450:213-21
pubmed: 27424757
Genet Mol Res. 2017 May 25;16(2):
pubmed: 28549198
J Proteomics. 2017 Oct 3;169:2-20
pubmed: 28546091
BMC Genomics. 2017 May 22;18(1):395
pubmed: 28532419