Who Buys Products with Nutrition and Health Claims? A Purchase Simulation with Eye Tracking on the Influence of Consumers' Nutrition Knowledge and Health Motivation.
Adolescent
Adult
Attention
Choice Behavior
/ physiology
Computer Simulation
Consumer Behavior
Decision Making
Female
Fixation, Ocular
Food Labeling
/ methods
Food Preferences
/ psychology
Health Behavior
/ physiology
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Motivation
Young Adult
consumer behavior
eye tracking
health claims
nutrition knowledge
purchase decision
visual attention
Journal
Nutrients
ISSN: 2072-6643
Titre abrégé: Nutrients
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101521595
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Sep 2019
12 Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
15
08
2019
revised:
04
09
2019
accepted:
09
09
2019
entrez:
25
9
2019
pubmed:
25
9
2019
medline:
4
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nutrition and health claims are seen as a way of promoting healthy aspects of food. However, the results of previous studies have been contradictory regarding the effect of these claims on purchase. This study aims to achieve a better understanding of how the consumer characteristics 'nutrition knowledge' and 'health motivation' influence the purchase of products with nutrition and health claims and what role gaze behavior plays. We included gaze behavior in our analysis, as visual attention on the claims is a precondition to its influence on the purchase decision. In a close-to-realistic shopping situation, consumers could choose from three-dimensional orange juice packages labeled with nutrition, health, and taste claims. In total, the sample consisted of 156 consumers. The data were analyzed with a structural equation model (SEM), linking the purchase decision for products with claims to gaze data recorded with a mobile eye tracker and consumer and product-related variables collected via the questionnaire. Results showed that the variables in the SEM explained 31% (8%) of the variance observed in the purchase of products with a nutrition (health) claim. The longer a consumer looked at a specific claim, the more likely the consumer would purchase the respective product. The lower the price and the higher the perceived healthiness and tastiness of the product further heightened its likelihood of being purchased. Interestingly, consumers with higher nutrition knowledge and/or higher health motivation looked longer at the nutrition and health claims; however, these consumer characteristics did not show an effect on the purchase decision. Implications for policy makers and marketers are given.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31547369
pii: nu11092199
doi: 10.3390/nu11092199
pmc: PMC6769812
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Nutrients. 2015 Nov 12;7(11):9353-68
pubmed: 26569301
Psychol Rev. 1980 Jul;87(4):329-54
pubmed: 7413885
Perception. 2007;36(1):91-100
pubmed: 17357707
Public Health Nutr. 2010 Jul;13(7):1099-106
pubmed: 20100390
Br J Nutr. 2016 Sep;116(6):1087-94
pubmed: 27503596
Nutrients. 2019 Aug 01;11(8):null
pubmed: 31374898
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
pubmed: 11994752
Prev Sci. 2000 Dec;1(4):173-81
pubmed: 11523746
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jul 11;14(1):93
pubmed: 28697787
Nutr Bull. 2015 Mar;40(1):66-72
pubmed: 25750587
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 08;15(11):
pubmed: 30413048
Appetite. 2009 Aug;53(1):84-92
pubmed: 19467277
Appetite. 2014 Dec;83:75-81
pubmed: 25128834
Appetite. 2019 Jan 1;132:1-7
pubmed: 30248439
Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:29-38
pubmed: 28433775
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2014 Mar;65(2):164-71
pubmed: 24059972
Conscious Cogn. 2006 Sep;15(3):620-7
pubmed: 16487725
Appetite. 1995 Dec;25(3):267-84
pubmed: 8746966
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jun;25:69-91
pubmed: 27908561
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Sep;144(1):190-206
pubmed: 23845447
Appetite. 2011 Apr;56(2):269-77
pubmed: 21238525
Appetite. 2014 Oct;81:253-60
pubmed: 24953195
Appetite. 2014 Nov;82:67-77
pubmed: 25038407
Appetite. 2016 Jan 1;96:38-46
pubmed: 26341955
Health Commun. 2005;17(1):1-16
pubmed: 15590339
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55(11):1552-60
pubmed: 24364816
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014 Aug;68(8):946-52
pubmed: 24918122
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):107-12
pubmed: 19854605
Appetite. 2009 Jun;52(3):684-692
pubmed: 19501767
Appetite. 2009 Apr;52(2):452-60
pubmed: 19135110
Meat Sci. 2019 Sep;155:8-15
pubmed: 31048239
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1968 Jun;9(2):162-6
pubmed: 5662739
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Apr;114(4):578-82
pubmed: 24332473
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Dec;14(12):2220-6
pubmed: 21752312
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Mar;14(3):510-22
pubmed: 20939940
Appetite. 2014 May;76:66-75
pubmed: 24503332
Psychol Bull. 1998 Nov;124(3):372-422
pubmed: 9849112
Psychometrika. 2009 Mar;74(1):107-120
pubmed: 20037639
Appetite. 2010 Oct;55(2):177-89
pubmed: 20546813
Appetite. 2015 Sep;92:207-16
pubmed: 26025086
Appetite. 2007 May;48(3):305-24
pubmed: 17157958
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Jan;98(1):194-8
pubmed: 23127213
Appetite. 2012 Aug;59(1):129-39
pubmed: 22524999
Nutrients. 2016 Mar 03;8(3):137
pubmed: 26950149