Effect of measles vaccination in infants younger than 9 months on the immune response to subsequent measles vaccine doses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.


Journal

The Lancet. Infectious diseases
ISSN: 1474-4457
Titre abrégé: Lancet Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101130150

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2019
Historique:
received: 22 08 2018
revised: 20 04 2019
accepted: 13 06 2019
pubmed: 25 9 2019
medline: 10 6 2020
entrez: 25 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Vaccinating infants with a first dose of measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) before 9 months of age in high-risk settings has the potential to reduce measles-related morbidity and mortality. However, there is concern that early vaccination might blunt the immune response to subsequent measles vaccine doses. We systematically reviewed the available evidence on the effect of MCV1 administration to infants younger than 9 months on their immune responses to subsequent MCV doses. For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched for randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials, outbreak investigations, and cohort and case-control studies without restriction on publication dates, in which MCV1 was administered to infants younger than 9 months. We did the literature search on June 2, 2015, and updated it on Jan 14, 2019. We included studies reporting data on strength or duration of humoral and cellular immune responses, and on vaccine efficacy or vaccine effectiveness after two-dose or three-dose MCV schedules. Our outcome measures were proportion of seropositive infants, geometric mean titre, vaccine efficacy, vaccine effectiveness, antibody avidity index, and T-cell stimulation index. We used random-effects meta-analysis to derive pooled estimates of the outcomes, where appropriate. We assessed the methodological quality of included studies using Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. Our search retrieved 1156 records and 85 were excluded due to duplication. 1071 records were screened for eligibility, of which 351 were eligible for full-text screening and 21 were eligible for inclusion in the review. From 13 studies, the pooled proportion of infants seropositive after two MCV doses, with MCV1 administered before 9 months of age, was 98% (95% CI 96-99; I Our findings suggest that administering MCV1 to infants younger than 9 months followed by additional MCV doses results in high seropositivity, vaccine effectiveness, and T-cell responses, which are independent of the age at MCV1, supporting the vaccination of very young infants in high-risk settings. However, we also found some evidence that MCV1 administered to infants younger than 9 months resulted in lower antibody titres after one or two subsequent doses of MCV than when measles vaccination is started at age 9 months or older. The clinical and public-health relevance of this immunity blunting effect are uncertain. WHO.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Vaccinating infants with a first dose of measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) before 9 months of age in high-risk settings has the potential to reduce measles-related morbidity and mortality. However, there is concern that early vaccination might blunt the immune response to subsequent measles vaccine doses. We systematically reviewed the available evidence on the effect of MCV1 administration to infants younger than 9 months on their immune responses to subsequent MCV doses.
METHODS
For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched for randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials, outbreak investigations, and cohort and case-control studies without restriction on publication dates, in which MCV1 was administered to infants younger than 9 months. We did the literature search on June 2, 2015, and updated it on Jan 14, 2019. We included studies reporting data on strength or duration of humoral and cellular immune responses, and on vaccine efficacy or vaccine effectiveness after two-dose or three-dose MCV schedules. Our outcome measures were proportion of seropositive infants, geometric mean titre, vaccine efficacy, vaccine effectiveness, antibody avidity index, and T-cell stimulation index. We used random-effects meta-analysis to derive pooled estimates of the outcomes, where appropriate. We assessed the methodological quality of included studies using Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines.
FINDINGS
Our search retrieved 1156 records and 85 were excluded due to duplication. 1071 records were screened for eligibility, of which 351 were eligible for full-text screening and 21 were eligible for inclusion in the review. From 13 studies, the pooled proportion of infants seropositive after two MCV doses, with MCV1 administered before 9 months of age, was 98% (95% CI 96-99; I
INTERPRETATION
Our findings suggest that administering MCV1 to infants younger than 9 months followed by additional MCV doses results in high seropositivity, vaccine effectiveness, and T-cell responses, which are independent of the age at MCV1, supporting the vaccination of very young infants in high-risk settings. However, we also found some evidence that MCV1 administered to infants younger than 9 months resulted in lower antibody titres after one or two subsequent doses of MCV than when measles vaccination is started at age 9 months or older. The clinical and public-health relevance of this immunity blunting effect are uncertain.
FUNDING
WHO.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31548081
pii: S1473-3099(19)30396-2
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30396-2
pmc: PMC6838663
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Viral 0
Measles Vaccine 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1246-1254

Subventions

Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Références

J Infect Dis. 2004 Jul 1;190(1):83-90
pubmed: 15195246
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64
pubmed: 19622511
Vaccine. 2005 May 9;23(25):3247-55
pubmed: 15837229
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. ;92(17):205-27
pubmed: 28459148
J Infect Dis. 2013 Jul;208(1):10-6
pubmed: 23661802
Int J Epidemiol. 1983 Sep;12(3):340-3
pubmed: 6629623
J Infect Dis. 2008 Nov 15;198(10):1457-65
pubmed: 18828743
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Nov;19(11):1235-1245
pubmed: 31548079
Vaccine. 2001 Feb 28;19(15-16):1951-9
pubmed: 11228365
Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71(3-4):421-8
pubmed: 8324862
Vaccine. 2014 Jun 30;32(31):4001-5
pubmed: 24837773
Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Sep;126(3):438-49
pubmed: 3618578
J Immunol. 1999 May 1;162(9):5569-75
pubmed: 10228039
Lancet. 1997 Jul 12;350(9071):101-5
pubmed: 9228962
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 1;65(7):1094-1102
pubmed: 28595358
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Nov 30;67(47):1323-1329
pubmed: 30496160
Pediatrics. 1994 Jun;93(6 Pt 1):939-44
pubmed: 8190581
J Infect Dis. 2007 Nov 1;196(9):1339-45
pubmed: 17922398
Dev Biol Stand. 1986;65:13-21
pubmed: 3549395
Vaccine. 2016 Mar 14;34(12):1459-64
pubmed: 26873052
J Infect Dis. 2011 Jul;204 Suppl 1:S133-48
pubmed: 21666154
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 May 2;66(10):1573-1580
pubmed: 29177407
Vaccine. 2013 May 17;31(21):2531-7
pubmed: 23026688
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2009 Aug 28;84(35):349-60
pubmed: 19714924
Pediatrics. 1996 Feb;97(2):232-5
pubmed: 8584383
Biologicals. 1995 Mar;23(1):95-106
pubmed: 7619443
J Infect Dis. 2001 Oct 1;184(7):817-26
pubmed: 11528592
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;55(3):394-402
pubmed: 22543023
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Mar;7(3):e313-e320
pubmed: 30784632
J Infect Dis. 2013 Jul;208(1):1-3
pubmed: 23661801
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995 Jan;14(1):17-22
pubmed: 7715983
Vaccine. 2003 Jul 28;21(24):3398-405
pubmed: 12850348
Ann Saudi Med. 1992 Jan;12(1):110-1
pubmed: 17589114
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998 Nov;17(11):1034-9
pubmed: 9849988
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
J Infect Dis. 2013 Feb 15;207(4):574-82
pubmed: 23300162
Vaccine. 2001 Oct 12;20(1-2):226-34
pubmed: 11567768
Trop Geogr Med. 1981 Dec;33(4):379-82
pubmed: 7342385
Vaccine. 2012 Mar 28;30(15):2543-50
pubmed: 22314136
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94
pubmed: 21195583
J Infect Dis. 2014 Sep 1;210(5):693-700
pubmed: 24688075
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Mar-Apr;93(2):214-9
pubmed: 10450452
Lancet. 2017 Dec 2;390(10111):2490-2502
pubmed: 28673424
Prog Med Virol. 1989;36:1-33
pubmed: 2685909
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120

Auteurs

Laura M Nic Lochlainn (LM)

Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.

Brechje de Gier (B)

Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.

Nicoline van der Maas (N)

Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.

Rob van Binnendijk (R)

Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.

Peter M Strebel (PM)

Expanded Programme on Immunization, Department of Immunization, Vaccines, and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Tracey Goodman (T)

Expanded Programme on Immunization, Department of Immunization, Vaccines, and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Hester E de Melker (HE)

Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.

William J Moss (WJ)

International Vaccine Access Center and Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore MD, USA.

Susan J M Hahné (SJM)

Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands. Electronic address: susan.hahne@rivm.nl.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH