How do seabirds modify their search behaviour when encountering fishing boats?
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
20
06
2019
accepted:
03
09
2019
entrez:
25
9
2019
pubmed:
25
9
2019
medline:
17
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Seabirds are well known to be attracted by fishing boats to forage on offal and baits. We used recently developed loggers that record accurate GPS position and detect the presence of boats through their radar emissions to examine how albatrosses use Area Restricted Search (ARS) and if so, have specific ARS behaviours, when attending boats. As much as 78.5% of locations with a radar detection (contact with boat) during a trip occurred within ARS: 36.8% of all large-scale ARS (n = 212) and 14.7% of all small-scale ARS (n = 1476) were associated with the presence of a boat. During small-scale ARS, birds spent more time and had greater sinuosity during boat-associated ARS compared with other ARS that we considered natural. For, small-scale ARS associated with boats, those performed over shelves were longer in duration, had greater sinuosity, and birds spent more time sitting on water compared with oceanic ARS associated with boats. We also found that the proportion of small-scale ARS tend to be more frequently nested in larger-scale ARS was higher for birds associated with boats and that ARS behaviour differed between oceanic (tuna fisheries) and shelf-edge (mainly Patagonian toothfish fisheries) habitats. We suggest that, in seabird species attracted by boats, a significant amount of ARS behaviours are associated with boats, and that it is important to be able to separate ARS behaviours associated to boats from natural searching behaviours. Our study suggest that studying ARS characteristics should help attribute specific behaviours associated to the presence of boats and understand associated risks between fisheries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31550257
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222615
pii: PONE-D-19-17497
pmc: PMC6759163
doi:
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.2p80260']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0222615Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 21;116(21):10339-10347
pubmed: 31061117
Science. 2002 Feb 15;295(5558):1259
pubmed: 11847332
Methods Ecol Evol. 2014 Sep;5(9):944-946
pubmed: 25810896
J Anim Ecol. 2009 Jul;78(4):880-9
pubmed: 19426254
Ecology. 2008 Dec;89(12):3336-48
pubmed: 19137941
Am Nat. 2007 Nov;170(5):734-43
pubmed: 17926295
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jul;87(4):945-955
pubmed: 29476544
Curr Biol. 2014 Jun 2;24(11):R514-5
pubmed: 24892908
Ecol Evol. 2017 Jul 26;7(17):6766-6778
pubmed: 28904758
Nature. 2004 Feb 19;427(6976):727-30
pubmed: 14973483
J Neurosci. 2004 Feb 4;24(5):1217-25
pubmed: 14762140
Conserv Biol. 2018 Feb;32(1):240-245
pubmed: 28598528
Ecol Evol. 2017 Nov 23;8(1):13-24
pubmed: 29321847
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 23;8(8):e71246
pubmed: 24058400
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 03;8(9):e73051
pubmed: 24019892
Ecol Evol. 2017 Apr 04;7(10):3335-3347
pubmed: 28515870
Physiol Meas. 2014 Nov;35(11):2183-9
pubmed: 25340887
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 May 22;275(1639):1149-56
pubmed: 18270155
Ecology. 2012 Nov;93(11):2336-42
pubmed: 23236905