Comparison of propofol-ketamine versuspropofol-remifentanil in children anaesthetized for gastroscopy.


Journal

Anaesthesiology intensive therapy
ISSN: 1731-2531
Titre abrégé: Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101472620

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
pubmed: 26 9 2019
medline: 29 8 2020
entrez: 26 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The search for ideal anaesthesia is still an open research issue. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare two methods of general anaesthesia with preserved own breath - propofol with ketamine and propofol with remifentanil - in children anaesthetized for gastroscopy. The study included 90 children enrolled for elective endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract under general anaesthesia. The patients were randomized to one of two groups: Group K consisted of children anesthetized with propofol and ketamine, Group R included children anesthetized with propofol and remifentanil. Parameters monitored during anaesthesia were induction time, respiratory and circulatory parameters, adverse events, waking time and the child's condition after regaining consciousness. The groups differed significantly in time of induction of anaesthesia (Group K 3 ± 1 min vs. Group R 4 ± 2.5 min; P < 0.001), waking time (Group R 4 ± 4.5 min vs. Group K 6 ± 5 min; P < 0.01), condition of the child after regaining consciousness (Group R 90.9% calm, Group of K 54% confused; P < 0.001) and evaluation of test conditions in the opinion of the gastroenterologist (in favour of Group K; P < 0.05). Both methods of anaesthesia presented in the paper are safe and can be used in children to perform endoscopy. Combining propofol with ketamine allows fast induction of anaesthesia and creates very good conditions for the examination. Combining propofol with remifentanil allows fast and full return of consciousness after anaesthesia.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The search for ideal anaesthesia is still an open research issue. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare two methods of general anaesthesia with preserved own breath - propofol with ketamine and propofol with remifentanil - in children anaesthetized for gastroscopy.
METHODS
The study included 90 children enrolled for elective endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract under general anaesthesia. The patients were randomized to one of two groups: Group K consisted of children anesthetized with propofol and ketamine, Group R included children anesthetized with propofol and remifentanil. Parameters monitored during anaesthesia were induction time, respiratory and circulatory parameters, adverse events, waking time and the child's condition after regaining consciousness.
RESULTS
The groups differed significantly in time of induction of anaesthesia (Group K 3 ± 1 min vs. Group R 4 ± 2.5 min; P < 0.001), waking time (Group R 4 ± 4.5 min vs. Group K 6 ± 5 min; P < 0.01), condition of the child after regaining consciousness (Group R 90.9% calm, Group of K 54% confused; P < 0.001) and evaluation of test conditions in the opinion of the gastroenterologist (in favour of Group K; P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Both methods of anaesthesia presented in the paper are safe and can be used in children to perform endoscopy. Combining propofol with ketamine allows fast induction of anaesthesia and creates very good conditions for the examination. Combining propofol with remifentanil allows fast and full return of consciousness after anaesthesia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31550872
pii: 37810
doi: 10.5114/ait.2019.88185
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anesthetics, Combined 0
Anesthetics, Dissociative 0
Anesthetics, Intravenous 0
Ketamine 690G0D6V8H
Remifentanil P10582JYYK
Propofol YI7VU623SF

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

262-267

Auteurs

Maria Damps (M)

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Upper Silesian Child Health Centre, Katowice, Poland.

Ludwik Stołtny (L)

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Upper Silesian Child Health Centre, Katowice, Poland.

Jadwiga Siemek-Mitela (J)

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Upper Silesian Child Health Centre, Katowice, Poland.

Andrzej Lekstan (A)

Department of Surgery, Vascular Surgery and Transplantation, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Łukasz Krzych (Ł)

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Ewa Kucewicz-Czech (E)

Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH