Intrinsic calcification angle: a novel feature of the vulnerable coronary plaque in patients with type 2 diabetes: an optical coherence tomography study.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
/ complications
Aged
Coronary Artery Disease
/ complications
Coronary Vessels
/ diagnostic imaging
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ complications
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Plaque, Atherosclerotic
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Risk Factors
Rupture, Spontaneous
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Vascular Calcification
/ complications
Atherosclerosis
Coronary artery disease
Coronary calcification
Diabetes mellitus
Optical coherence tomography
Plaque vulnerability
Journal
Cardiovascular diabetology
ISSN: 1475-2840
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Diabetol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147637
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 09 2019
24 09 2019
Historique:
received:
28
05
2019
accepted:
11
09
2019
entrez:
26
9
2019
pubmed:
26
9
2019
medline:
12
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Coronary calcification is associated with high risk for cardiovascular events. However, its impact on plaque vulnerability is incompletely understood. In the present study we defined the intrinsic calcification angle (ICA) as the angle externally projected by a vascular calcification and analyzed its role as novel feature of coronary plaque vulnerability in patients with type 2 diabetes. Optical coherence tomography was used to determine ICA in 219 calcifications from 56 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and 143 calcifications from 36 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We then used finite elements analysis to gain mechanistic insight into the effects of ICA. Minimal (139.8 ± 32.8° vs. 165.6 ± 21.6°, p < 0.001) and mean ICA (164.1 ± 14.3° vs. 176.0 ± 8.4°, p < 0.001) were lower in ACS vs. stable CAD patients. Mean ICA predicted ACS with very good diagnostic efficiency (AUC = 0.840, 95% CI 0.797-0.882, p < 0.001, optimal cut-off 175.9°); younger age (OR 0.95 per year, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, p = 0.002), male sex (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.41-3.38, p < 0.001), lower HDL-cholesterol (OR 0.82 per 10 mg/dl, 95% CI 0.68-0.98, p = 0.029) and ACS (OR 14.71, 95% CI 8.47-25.64, p < 0.001) were determinants of ICA < 175.9°. A lower ICA predicted ACS (OR for 10°-variation 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.52, p < 0.001) independently from fibrous cap thickness, presence of macrophages or extension of lipid core. In finite elements analysis we confirmed that lower ICA causes increased stress on a lesion's fibrous cap; this effect was potentiated in more superficial calcifications and adds to the destabilizing role of smaller calcifications. Our clinical and mechanistic data for the first time identify ICA as a novel feature of coronary plaque vulnerability.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Coronary calcification is associated with high risk for cardiovascular events. However, its impact on plaque vulnerability is incompletely understood. In the present study we defined the intrinsic calcification angle (ICA) as the angle externally projected by a vascular calcification and analyzed its role as novel feature of coronary plaque vulnerability in patients with type 2 diabetes.
METHODS
Optical coherence tomography was used to determine ICA in 219 calcifications from 56 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and 143 calcifications from 36 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We then used finite elements analysis to gain mechanistic insight into the effects of ICA.
RESULTS
Minimal (139.8 ± 32.8° vs. 165.6 ± 21.6°, p < 0.001) and mean ICA (164.1 ± 14.3° vs. 176.0 ± 8.4°, p < 0.001) were lower in ACS vs. stable CAD patients. Mean ICA predicted ACS with very good diagnostic efficiency (AUC = 0.840, 95% CI 0.797-0.882, p < 0.001, optimal cut-off 175.9°); younger age (OR 0.95 per year, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, p = 0.002), male sex (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.41-3.38, p < 0.001), lower HDL-cholesterol (OR 0.82 per 10 mg/dl, 95% CI 0.68-0.98, p = 0.029) and ACS (OR 14.71, 95% CI 8.47-25.64, p < 0.001) were determinants of ICA < 175.9°. A lower ICA predicted ACS (OR for 10°-variation 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.52, p < 0.001) independently from fibrous cap thickness, presence of macrophages or extension of lipid core. In finite elements analysis we confirmed that lower ICA causes increased stress on a lesion's fibrous cap; this effect was potentiated in more superficial calcifications and adds to the destabilizing role of smaller calcifications.
CONCLUSION
Our clinical and mechanistic data for the first time identify ICA as a novel feature of coronary plaque vulnerability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31551093
doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0926-x
pii: 10.1186/s12933-019-0926-x
pmc: PMC6760065
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
122Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Dec 1;16(1):152
pubmed: 29195505
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jul;40(7):986
pubmed: 28522554
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Oct;5(10):990-9
pubmed: 23058065
Circ J. 2019 Jun 25;83(7):1480-1488
pubmed: 31118354
Circulation. 2004 Nov 30;110(22):3424-9
pubmed: 15557374
Am J Cardiol. 1970 Sep;26(3):241-7
pubmed: 5505449
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Mar 20;59(12):1058-72
pubmed: 22421299
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Jun 15;17(1):90
pubmed: 29907160
EuroIntervention. 2017 Jun 20;13(3):312-319
pubmed: 27973330
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 Aug 21;13:117
pubmed: 25248966
EJIFCC. 2009 Jan 20;19(4):203-11
pubmed: 27683318
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 3;103(40):14678-83
pubmed: 17003118
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 24;13(10):e0205984
pubmed: 30356326
Am J Cardiol. 1989 Apr 1;63(12):870-2
pubmed: 2929446
Curr Opin Lipidol. 2014 Oct;25(5):327-32
pubmed: 25188916
Eur Heart J. 2013 Mar;34(10):729-41
pubmed: 23186807
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 1;112(1):34-40
pubmed: 23540654
EBioMedicine. 2019 Jun;44:41-49
pubmed: 31126891
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014 Dec;4(6):460-9
pubmed: 25610803
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jul 13;7(14):
pubmed: 30006490
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jan;9(1):
pubmed: 26743463
J Biomech. 2014 Mar 3;47(4):870-7
pubmed: 24503048
Heart Vessels. 2016 Dec;31(12):1915-1922
pubmed: 26945869
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Nov;5(11):1150-8
pubmed: 23174639
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012 Sep 1;303(5):H619-28
pubmed: 22777419
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Sep;107(9):763-771
pubmed: 29654434
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 25;110(26):10741-6
pubmed: 23733926
Ann Biomed Eng. 2014 Feb;42(2):415-31
pubmed: 23842694
EuroIntervention. 2012 Dec 20;8(8):955-61
pubmed: 23253548
Circulation. 1993 Apr;87(4):1179-87
pubmed: 8462145
Circulation. 2017 Jul 11;136(2):126-137
pubmed: 28465287
Heart Vessels. 2016 Jun;31(6):881-9
pubmed: 25964072