Free propagation phase-contrast breast CT provides higher image quality than cone-beam breast-CT at low radiation doses: a feasibility study on human mastectomies.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 09 2019
24 09 2019
Historique:
received:
18
01
2019
accepted:
22
08
2019
entrez:
26
9
2019
pubmed:
26
9
2019
medline:
30
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this study we demonstrate the first direct comparison between synchrotron x-ray propagation-based CT (PB-CT) and cone-beam breast-CT (CB-CT) on human mastectomy specimens (N = 12) including different benign and malignant lesions. The image quality and diagnostic power of the obtained data sets were compared and judged by two independent expert radiologists. Two cases are presented in detail in this paper including a comparison with the corresponding histological evaluation. Results indicate that with PB-CT it is possible to increase the level of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) keeping the same level of dose used for the CB-CT or achieve the same level of CNR reached by CB-CT at a lower level of dose. In other words, PB-CT can achieve a higher diagnostic potential compared to the commercial breast-CT system while also delivering a considerably lower mean glandular dose. Therefore, we believe that PB-CT technique, if translated to a clinical setting, could have a significant impact in improving breast cancer diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31551475
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50075-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-50075-6
pmc: PMC6760215
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13762Références
Biomed Opt Express. 2015 Jul 29;6(8):3099-112
pubmed: 26309770
Med Phys. 2013 Jan;40(1):014301
pubmed: 23298126
Eur Radiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):3742-3750
pubmed: 29374322
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1245-56
pubmed: 15755947
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2010 Sep;1(3):218-23
pubmed: 22693368
Med Phys. 2007 Jul;34(7):2995-3004
pubmed: 17822008
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2015 Nov;22(6):1509-23
pubmed: 26524316
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Feb 21;61(4):1634-49
pubmed: 26836274
Acta Radiol. 2011 Jul 1;52(6):592-6
pubmed: 21498282
Acad Radiol. 2019 Jun;26(6):e79-e89
pubmed: 30149975
Eur Radiol. 2017 Dec;27(12):5185-5195
pubmed: 28677053
Eur J Epidemiol. 1998 Jun;14(4):315-20
pubmed: 9690746
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Apr;63(4):663-5
pubmed: 19628440
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 21;8(1):4922
pubmed: 29563553
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Mar 21;62(6):2315-2332
pubmed: 28140377
Radiology. 2011 Jun;259(3):684-94
pubmed: 21436089
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2018 Sep 1;25(Pt 5):1460-1466
pubmed: 30179186
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30
pubmed: 29313949
Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(6):217
pubmed: 18190724
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 21;7(1):15953
pubmed: 29162913
Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Sep 20;18(1):91
pubmed: 27645219
Clin Imaging. 2017 Mar - Apr;42:50-59
pubmed: 27875762
Radiologe. 2010 Nov;50(11):982-90
pubmed: 20945146
Rev Sci Instrum. 2011 Dec;82(12):123701
pubmed: 22225218
J Microsc. 2002 Apr;206(Pt 1):33-40
pubmed: 12000561
Br J Cancer. 2012 Jan 31;106(3):525-37
pubmed: 22233923
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Dec 18;63(24):24NT03
pubmed: 30524112
Eur Radiol. 2012 Jun;22(6):1265-70
pubmed: 22358426
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Aug 21;60(16):N311-23
pubmed: 26267405
Eur Radiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):3731-3741
pubmed: 29594402
Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Jul 06;14(4):R102
pubmed: 22770227
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):496-509
pubmed: 20651210
Diagnostics (Basel). 2018 Apr 04;8(2):
pubmed: 29617294
Radiol Clin North Am. 2014 May;52(3):489-97
pubmed: 24792651
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jul;211(1):133-145
pubmed: 29792739
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Oct;211(4):926-932
pubmed: 30063382
JAMA. 2001 Jan 10;285(2):171-6
pubmed: 11176809