A Multicenter, International Cohort Analysis of 1435 Cases to Support Clinical Trial Design in Acute Pancreatitis.
C-reactive protein
acute pancreatitis
sample size calculation
trial design
white blood cell
Journal
Frontiers in physiology
ISSN: 1664-042X
Titre abrégé: Front Physiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101549006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
20
06
2019
accepted:
07
08
2019
entrez:
26
9
2019
pubmed:
26
9
2019
medline:
26
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
C-reactive protein level (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC) have been variably used in clinical trials on acute pancreatitis (AP). We assessed their potential role. First, we investigated studies which have used CRP or WBC, to describe their current role in trials on AP. Second, we extracted the data of 1435 episodes of AP from our registry. CRP and WBC on admission, within 24 h from the onset of pain and their highest values were analyzed. Descriptive statistical tools as Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney Our literature review showed extreme variability of CRP used as an inclusion criterion or as a primary outcome or both in past and current trials on AP. In our cohort, CRP levels on admission poorly predicted mortality and severe cases of AP; AUC: 0.669 (CI:0.569-0.770); AUC:0.681 (CI: 0.601-0.761), respectively. CRP levels measured within 24 h from the onset of pain failed to predict mortality or severity; AUC: 0.741 (CI:0.627-0.854); AUC:0.690 (CI:0.586-0.793), respectively. The highest CRP during hospitalization had equally poor predictive accuracy for mortality and severity AUC:0.656 (CI:0.544-0.768); AUC:0.705 (CI:0.640-0.769) respectively. CRP within 24 h from the onset of pain used as an inclusion criterion markedly increased the combined event rate of mortality and severe AP (13% for CRP > 25 mg/l and 28% for CRP > 200 mg/l). CRP within 24 h from the onset of pain as an inclusion criterion elevates event rates and reduces the number of patients required in trials on AP.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
C-reactive protein level (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC) have been variably used in clinical trials on acute pancreatitis (AP). We assessed their potential role.
METHODS
METHODS
First, we investigated studies which have used CRP or WBC, to describe their current role in trials on AP. Second, we extracted the data of 1435 episodes of AP from our registry. CRP and WBC on admission, within 24 h from the onset of pain and their highest values were analyzed. Descriptive statistical tools as Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney
RESULTS
RESULTS
Our literature review showed extreme variability of CRP used as an inclusion criterion or as a primary outcome or both in past and current trials on AP. In our cohort, CRP levels on admission poorly predicted mortality and severe cases of AP; AUC: 0.669 (CI:0.569-0.770); AUC:0.681 (CI: 0.601-0.761), respectively. CRP levels measured within 24 h from the onset of pain failed to predict mortality or severity; AUC: 0.741 (CI:0.627-0.854); AUC:0.690 (CI:0.586-0.793), respectively. The highest CRP during hospitalization had equally poor predictive accuracy for mortality and severity AUC:0.656 (CI:0.544-0.768); AUC:0.705 (CI:0.640-0.769) respectively. CRP within 24 h from the onset of pain used as an inclusion criterion markedly increased the combined event rate of mortality and severe AP (13% for CRP > 25 mg/l and 28% for CRP > 200 mg/l).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
CRP within 24 h from the onset of pain as an inclusion criterion elevates event rates and reduces the number of patients required in trials on AP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31551798
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01092
pmc: PMC6738025
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1092Références
Int J Pancreatol. 1999 Jun;25(3):195-210
pubmed: 10453421
Lancet. 2000 Jun 3;355(9219):1955-60
pubmed: 10859041
Br J Surg. 2000 Oct;87(10):1375-81
pubmed: 11044164
Can J Surg. 2005 Aug;48(4):298-306
pubmed: 16149365
JOP. 2006 Jul 10;7(4):361-71
pubmed: 16832133
Dig Dis Sci. 1990 Jan;35(1):97-105
pubmed: 1688526
Gastroenterology. 1991 Sep;101(3):782-5
pubmed: 1907253
Pancreas. 2010 Nov;39(8):1226-30
pubmed: 20531240
Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1179-1187.e3
pubmed: 22885331
Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):102-11
pubmed: 23100216
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb 14;19(6):917-22
pubmed: 23431120
Rev Med Chil. 2013 May;141(5):562-7
pubmed: 24089269
Chin J Integr Med. 2013 Dec;19(12):913-7
pubmed: 24307311
Br J Surg. 1989 Feb;76(2):177-81
pubmed: 2467718
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18(17):2523-6
pubmed: 25268099
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 28;21(8):2387-94
pubmed: 25741146
Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):318-20.e3
pubmed: 26112745
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 24;11(10):e0165244
pubmed: 27776171
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 31;11(10):e0165309
pubmed: 27798670
Pancreas. 2018 Jan;47(1):65-71
pubmed: 29215536
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Feb;6(1):63-72
pubmed: 29435315
Pancreatology. 2018 May 7;:null
pubmed: 29754857
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug 13;:null
pubmed: 30106837
Gut. 1987 Jun;28(6):764-71
pubmed: 3623221
J Clin Pathol. 1984 Feb;37(2):207-11
pubmed: 6546392
Dig Dis Sci. 1995 Nov;40(11):2341-8
pubmed: 7587812
Gut. 1993 Jan;34(1):41-5
pubmed: 7679365
Br J Surg. 1996 Mar;83(3):349-53
pubmed: 8665189