Pelvic Incidence in Spines With 4 and 6 Lumbar Vertebrae.
4 lumbar vertebrae
6 lumbar vertebrae
cadaver
pelvic incidence
Journal
Global spine journal
ISSN: 2192-5682
Titre abrégé: Global Spine J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101596156
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
entrez:
26
9
2019
pubmed:
26
9
2019
medline:
26
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Anatomical study. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of abnormal lumbar vertebrae (4 and 6) and note any differences in pelvic incidence (PI) between spines with 4, 5, and 6 lumbar vertebrae. We screened 2980 dry cadaveric specimens from an osteological collection. Pelvises were reconstructed by articulating the sacra and innominate bones. PI was measured in all specimens via lateral photographs. L6-pelvic incidence (L6PI) was also measured, by articulating L6 to the sacrum and measuring PI from the superior aspect of the L6 vertebral body. Of the specimens screened, 969 specimens were evaluated. Average age of death for all specimens was 50.4 ± 15.4 years. The prevalence of 6 lumbar vertebrae was 0.8% (n = 23), and the prevalence of 4 lumbar vertebrae was 1.8% (n = 54). PI measured 38.5° in specimens with 4 lumbar vertebrae, and 46.7° and 47.1° in specimens with 5 and 6 lumbar vertebrae, respectively. PI was significantly different between specimens with 4 and 5 lumbar vertebrae ( In our large cadaveric study of full spines, we reported a lower prevalence of spines with 4 and 6 lumbar vertebrae compared to previous studies. PI was significantly decreased in subjects with 4 lumbar vertebrae compared with those with normal spines, and special caution should be taken when managing sagittal balance in these patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31552150
doi: 10.1177/2192568219833029
pii: 10.1177_2192568219833029
pmc: PMC6745636
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
708-712Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
East Afr Med J. 2000 Jan;77(1):16-9
pubmed: 10944832
J Hum Evol. 2002 Nov;43(5):621-43
pubmed: 12457852
Acta Orthop Belg. 2007 Dec;73(6):687-95
pubmed: 18260478
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
J Hum Evol. 2012 Apr;62(4):486-97
pubmed: 22425070
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 May 1;95(9):828-33
pubmed: 23636190
Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 Sep;36(7):689-93
pubmed: 24370578
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Sep;83(9):1679-82
pubmed: 24935139
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2015 Feb;156(2):295-303
pubmed: 25331588
Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3589-3595
pubmed: 26538158
Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3602-3607
pubmed: 26814474
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(34):e4682
pubmed: 27559975
Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3694-3698
pubmed: 27671281
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1987 Sep;74(1):65-81
pubmed: 3688211