An international, multi-institution survey of the use of EUS in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions.
EUS
pancreatic cystic lesion
survey
Journal
Endoscopic ultrasound
ISSN: 2303-9027
Titre abrégé: Endosc Ultrasound
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101622292
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
26
9
2019
medline:
26
9
2019
entrez:
26
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Currently, pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are recognized with increasing frequency and have become a more common finding in clinical practice. EUS is challenging in the diagnosis of PCLs and evidence-based decisions are lacking in its application. This study aimed to develop strong recommendations for the use of EUS in the diagnosis of PCLs, based on the experience of experts in the field. A survey regarding the practice of EUS in the evaluation of PCLs was drafted by the committee member of the International Society of EUS Task Force (ISEUS-TF). It was disseminated to experts of EUS who were also members of the ISEUS-TF. In some cases, percentage agreement with some statements was calculated; in others, the options with the greatest numbers of responses were summarized. Fifteen questions were extracted and disseminated among 60 experts for the survey. Fifty-three experts completed the survey within the specified time frame. The average volume of EUS cases at the experts' institutions is 988.5 cases per year. Despite the limitations of EUS alone in the morphologic diagnosis of PCLs, the results of the survey indicate that EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration is widely expected to become a more valuable method.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
Currently, pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are recognized with increasing frequency and have become a more common finding in clinical practice. EUS is challenging in the diagnosis of PCLs and evidence-based decisions are lacking in its application. This study aimed to develop strong recommendations for the use of EUS in the diagnosis of PCLs, based on the experience of experts in the field.
METHODS
METHODS
A survey regarding the practice of EUS in the evaluation of PCLs was drafted by the committee member of the International Society of EUS Task Force (ISEUS-TF). It was disseminated to experts of EUS who were also members of the ISEUS-TF. In some cases, percentage agreement with some statements was calculated; in others, the options with the greatest numbers of responses were summarized.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Fifteen questions were extracted and disseminated among 60 experts for the survey. Fifty-three experts completed the survey within the specified time frame. The average volume of EUS cases at the experts' institutions is 988.5 cases per year.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the limitations of EUS alone in the morphologic diagnosis of PCLs, the results of the survey indicate that EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration is widely expected to become a more valuable method.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31552915
pii: 267839
doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_61_19
pmc: PMC6927137
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
418-427Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
Gut Liver. 2014 Mar;8(2):215-8
pubmed: 24672664
Endoscopy. 2018 Nov;50(11):1105-1111
pubmed: 29980151
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jan;81(1):66-70
pubmed: 21183302
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan;49(1):114-20
pubmed: 24188361
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Nov;64(5):697-702
pubmed: 17055859
Endoscopy. 2012 Feb;44(2):190-206
pubmed: 22180307
Endosc Ultrasound. 2018 Mar-Apr;7(2):102-109
pubmed: 29667626
Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):628-34
pubmed: 19300203
Endosc Ultrasound. 2017 Mar-Apr;6(2):116-122
pubmed: 28440237
Dig Endosc. 2017 Sep;29(6):667-675
pubmed: 28218999
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jul;84(1):158-62
pubmed: 26772889
Endosc Ultrasound. 2018 Sep-Oct;7(5):289-292
pubmed: 30323154
Pancreatology. 2013 Jan-Feb;13(1):48-57
pubmed: 23395570
Diagn Cytopathol. 2004 Aug;31(2):100-5
pubmed: 15282721
Endosc Ultrasound. 2017 Mar-Apr;6(2):123-130
pubmed: 28440238
Endosc Ultrasound. 2016 Nov-Dec;5(6):377-383
pubmed: 28000629
Gastroenterology. 2015 Apr;148(4):819-22; quize12-3
pubmed: 25805375
Endosc Ultrasound. 2018 Nov-Dec;7(6):383-388
pubmed: 30168479
Endoscopy. 2017 Oct;49(10):989-1006
pubmed: 28898917
United European Gastroenterol J. 2014 Oct;2(5):391-6
pubmed: 25360317
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009 Mar;133(3):423-38
pubmed: 19260748
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Mar;3(3):231-6
pubmed: 15765442
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4522-4531
pubmed: 28374257
Endosc Ultrasound. 2018 Sep-Oct;7(5):306-309
pubmed: 30323158
Endosc Ultrasound. 2018 Sep-Oct;7(5):319-322
pubmed: 30323161
Dig Liver Dis. 2013 Sep;45(9):703-11
pubmed: 23415799
Endosc Ultrasound. 2017 Mar-Apr;6(2):75-82
pubmed: 28440232
Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Apr;53(4):470-4
pubmed: 11275888
Gastroenterology. 2015 Sep;149(3):825
pubmed: 26231607
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 16;351(12):1218-26
pubmed: 15371579
Pancreas. 2015 Nov;44(8):1329-33
pubmed: 26465956
Pancreatology. 2015 Sep-Oct;15(5):531-537
pubmed: 26375415
Gastroenterology. 2004 May;126(5):1330-6
pubmed: 15131794
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jan;61(1):8-12
pubmed: 15672049
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Sep;62(3):383-9
pubmed: 16111956
Endosc Ultrasound. 2017 Jan-Feb;6(1):25-30
pubmed: 28218197
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 28;21(20):6252-60
pubmed: 26034360
Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Jun;58(6):1751-7
pubmed: 23314918
Endosc Ultrasound. 2018 Sep-Oct;7(5):297-300
pubmed: 30323156
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 May;61(6):700-8
pubmed: 15855975
Endosc Ultrasound. 2018 Sep-Oct;7(5):335-342
pubmed: 28836521
Endosc Ultrasound. 2015 Apr-Jun;4(2):132-6
pubmed: 26020048
Endoscopy. 2015 Jul;47(7):626-31
pubmed: 25730281