European public perceptions of homelessness: A knowledge, attitudes and practices survey.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 09 04 2019
accepted: 16 08 2019
entrez: 26 9 2019
pubmed: 26 9 2019
medline: 10 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Addressing Citizen's perspectives on homelessness is crucial for the design of effective and durable policy responses, and available research in Europe is not yet substantive. We aim to explore citizens' opinions about homelessness and to explain the differences in attitudes within the general population of eight European countries: France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden. A nationally representative telephone survey of European citizens was conducted in 2017. Three domains were investigated: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices about homelessness. Based on a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA), a generalized linear model for clustered and weighted samples was used to probe the associations between groups with opposing attitudes. Response rates ranged from 30.4% to 33.5% (N = 5,295). Most respondents (57%) had poor knowledge about homelessness. Respondents who thought the government spent too much on homelessness, people who are homeless should be responsible for housing, people remain homeless by choice, or homelessness keeps capabilities/empowerment intact (regarding meals, family contact, and access to work) clustered together (negative attitudes, 30%). Respondents who were willing to pay taxes, welcomed a shelter, or acknowledged people who are homeless may lack some capabilities (i.e. agreed on discrimination in hiring) made another cluster (positive attitudes, 58%). Respondents living in semi-urban or urban areas (ORs 1.33 and 1.34) and those engaged in practices to support people who are homeless (ORs > 1.4; p<0.005) were more likely to report positive attitudes, whereas those from France and Poland (p<0.001) were less likely to report positive attitudes. The majority of European citizens hold positive attitudes towards people who are homeless, however there remain significant differences between and within countries. Although it is clear that there is strong support for increased government action and more effective solutions for Europe's growing homelessness crisis, there also remain public opinion barriers rooted in enduring negative perceptions.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Addressing Citizen's perspectives on homelessness is crucial for the design of effective and durable policy responses, and available research in Europe is not yet substantive. We aim to explore citizens' opinions about homelessness and to explain the differences in attitudes within the general population of eight European countries: France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden.
METHODS
A nationally representative telephone survey of European citizens was conducted in 2017. Three domains were investigated: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices about homelessness. Based on a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA), a generalized linear model for clustered and weighted samples was used to probe the associations between groups with opposing attitudes.
RESULTS
Response rates ranged from 30.4% to 33.5% (N = 5,295). Most respondents (57%) had poor knowledge about homelessness. Respondents who thought the government spent too much on homelessness, people who are homeless should be responsible for housing, people remain homeless by choice, or homelessness keeps capabilities/empowerment intact (regarding meals, family contact, and access to work) clustered together (negative attitudes, 30%). Respondents who were willing to pay taxes, welcomed a shelter, or acknowledged people who are homeless may lack some capabilities (i.e. agreed on discrimination in hiring) made another cluster (positive attitudes, 58%). Respondents living in semi-urban or urban areas (ORs 1.33 and 1.34) and those engaged in practices to support people who are homeless (ORs > 1.4; p<0.005) were more likely to report positive attitudes, whereas those from France and Poland (p<0.001) were less likely to report positive attitudes.
CONCLUSION
The majority of European citizens hold positive attitudes towards people who are homeless, however there remain significant differences between and within countries. Although it is clear that there is strong support for increased government action and more effective solutions for Europe's growing homelessness crisis, there also remain public opinion barriers rooted in enduring negative perceptions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31553769
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221896
pii: PONE-D-19-10094
pmc: PMC6760760
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0221896

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Aug;48(8):1042-7
pubmed: 9255837
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Oct 1;27(suppl_4):18-21
pubmed: 29028245
Am J Community Psychol. 1995 Aug;23(4):533-55
pubmed: 8546109
Am J Community Psychol. 1992 Feb;20(1):53-80
pubmed: 1562003
Trials. 2013 Sep 24;14:309
pubmed: 24063556
Am J Community Psychol. 2017 Dec;60(3-4):599-606
pubmed: 29027669
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91
pubmed: 11124735
Scand J Public Health. 2016 Dec;44(8):784-790
pubmed: 28929931
PLoS Med. 2008 Dec 2;5(12):e225
pubmed: 19053169
BMJ. 2003 Jul 12;327(7406):81
pubmed: 12855527
Stat Methods Med Res. 1992;1(1):97-117
pubmed: 1341654
Arch Public Health. 2018 Nov 28;76:71
pubmed: 30505443
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1971 Sep;19(3):321-33
pubmed: 5120021
Am J Public Health. 2013 Dec;103 Suppl 2:S294-301
pubmed: 24148051
Am J Community Psychol. 2006 Mar;37(1-2):47-61
pubmed: 16680536
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Apr;82(4):429-34
pubmed: 11295000
Lancet. 2014 Oct 25;384(9953):1529-40
pubmed: 25390578

Auteurs

Junie Petit (J)

Aix-Marseille University, School of Medicine-La Timone Medical Campus, CEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France.

Sandrine Loubiere (S)

Aix-Marseille University, School of Medicine-La Timone Medical Campus, CEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France.
Department of Research and Innovation, Support Unit for Clinical Research and Economic Evaluation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France.

Aurlie Tinland (A)

Aix-Marseille University, School of Medicine-La Timone Medical Campus, CEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France.
Department of Research and Innovation, Support Unit for Clinical Research and Economic Evaluation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France.

Maria Vargas-Moniz (M)

APPsyCI (Applied Psychology Research Center: Capabilities and Inclusion), ISPA-Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, Lisbon, Portugal.

Freek Spinnewijn (F)

FEANTSA, European Federation of National Organisations Working with the Homeless, Chaussée de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Rachel Manning (R)

Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Massimo Santinello (M)

Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia, Padova, Italy.

Judith Wolf (J)

Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Impuls-Netherlands Center for Social Care Research, Geert Grooteplein, EZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Anna Bokszczanin (A)

Institute of Psychology, Opole University, Pl. Staszica, Opole, Poland.

Roberto Bernad (R)

Rais Fundación, C/ Ardemans, Madrid, Spain.

Hakan Kallmen (H)

STAD, Stockholm Center for Psychiatry Research and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Norra Stati Onsgatan, Stockholm, Sweden.

Jose Ornelas (J)

APPsyCI (Applied Psychology Research Center: Capabilities and Inclusion), ISPA-Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, Lisbon, Portugal.

Pascal Auquier (P)

Aix-Marseille University, School of Medicine-La Timone Medical Campus, CEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France.
Department of Research and Innovation, Support Unit for Clinical Research and Economic Evaluation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH