Rarity of monodominance in hyperdiverse Amazonian forests.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 09 2019
25 09 2019
Historique:
received:
14
05
2019
accepted:
02
09
2019
entrez:
27
9
2019
pubmed:
27
9
2019
medline:
27
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Tropical forests are known for their high diversity. Yet, forest patches do occur in the tropics where a single tree species is dominant. Such "monodominant" forests are known from all of the main tropical regions. For Amazonia, we sampled the occurrence of monodominance in a massive, basin-wide database of forest-inventory plots from the Amazon Tree Diversity Network (ATDN). Utilizing a simple defining metric of at least half of the trees ≥ 10 cm diameter belonging to one species, we found only a few occurrences of monodominance in Amazonia, and the phenomenon was not significantly linked to previously hypothesized life history traits such wood density, seed mass, ectomycorrhizal associations, or Rhizobium nodulation. In our analysis, coppicing (the formation of sprouts at the base of the tree or on roots) was the only trait significantly linked to monodominance. While at specific locales coppicing or ectomycorrhizal associations may confer a considerable advantage to a tree species and lead to its monodominance, very few species have these traits. Mining of the ATDN dataset suggests that monodominance is quite rare in Amazonia, and may be linked primarily to edaphic factors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31554920
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50323-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-50323-9
pmc: PMC6761143
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13822Références
Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec 20;7(1):295-304
pubmed: 28070293
New Phytol. 2005 Aug;167(2):543-56
pubmed: 15998405
Science. 2001 Nov 23;294(5547):1702-4
pubmed: 11721052
Science. 2017 Mar 3;355(6328):925-931
pubmed: 28254935
Nature. 1999 Nov 25;402(6760):402-4
pubmed: 10586878
New Phytol. 2006;172(4):753-62
pubmed: 17096800
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Jul;2(7):1104-1111
pubmed: 29807995
New Phytol. 2018 Dec;220(4):1076-1091
pubmed: 29689121
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 12;113(15):4098-103
pubmed: 27035971
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 09;8(7):e68278
pubmed: 23874569
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 10;6(2):e16996
pubmed: 21347320
Nature. 2014 Jan 23;505(7484):543-5
pubmed: 24402225
New Phytol. 2012 Oct;196(2):367-382
pubmed: 22963677
New Phytol. 2013 Jul;199(1):41-51
pubmed: 23713553
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 5;9(1):3501
pubmed: 30837572
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 1;8(1):3872
pubmed: 29497098
Ecology. 2007 Mar;88(3):567-74
pubmed: 17503583
Science. 2004 Jul 30;305(5684):663-5
pubmed: 15286371
Nature. 2006 Sep 28;443(7110):444-7
pubmed: 17006512
Oecologia. 2010 Nov;164(3):785-95
pubmed: 20577764
Am Nat. 2001 Feb;157(2):141-53
pubmed: 18707268
Science. 1978 Mar 24;199(4335):1302-10
pubmed: 17840770
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55160
pubmed: 23383090
Ann Bot. 2002 Jul;90(1):53-64
pubmed: 12125773
New Phytol. 2011 Nov;192(3):699-712
pubmed: 21883231
Ann Bot. 2003 May;91(6):657-63
pubmed: 12714364
Mycorrhiza. 2008 Apr;18(4):217-222
pubmed: 18365256
Science. 2013 Oct 18;342(6156):1243092
pubmed: 24136971
Ecol Lett. 2016 Apr;19(4):383-92
pubmed: 26833573
New Phytol. 2005 Aug;167(2):324-6
pubmed: 15998386
J R Soc Interface. 2016 Apr;13(117):
pubmed: 27053657
J Ecol. 2016 Mar;104(2):497-506
pubmed: 27609991
Rev Biol Trop. 2014 Jun;62(2):443-54
pubmed: 25102630
Am Nat. 2017 Aug;190(S1):S105-S122
pubmed: 28731828
Ecol Lett. 2009 Aug;12(8):798-805
pubmed: 19473218
New Phytol. 2006;169(3):579-88
pubmed: 16411960