Multimodality imaging of pelvic floor anatomy.
Anatomy
Defecography
MR defecography
Pelvic floor
Journal
Abdominal radiology (New York)
ISSN: 2366-0058
Titre abrégé: Abdom Radiol (NY)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101674571
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
27
9
2019
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
27
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The pelvic floor is composed of a network of muscles, ligaments, and fasciae, which provide active and passive support for the pelvic organs. Impairment of these pelvic floor elements can result in a variety of functional abnormalities and single or multicompartment organ prolapse. Knowledge of normal pelvic floor anatomy can aid the radiologist in understanding the complex nature of pelvic floor dysfunction and is important for comprehensive image interpretation. This article provides an overview of normal anatomy of the pelvic floor as seen on magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and fluoroscopic studies performed in the evaluation of pelvic floor function.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31555847
doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02235-5
pii: 10.1007/s00261-019-02235-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1302-1311Références
Maglinte, D.D., et al., Association of compartment defects in pelvic floor dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1999. 172(2): p. 439-44.
Erlichman, D.B., et al., MRI anatomy and pathology of the anal canal. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2019.
Farouk El Sayed, R., The urogynecological side of pelvic floor MRI: the clinician’s needs and the radiologist’s role. Abdom Imaging, 2013. 38(5): p. 912-29.
Kobi, M., et al., Practical guide to dynamic pelvic floor MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2018. 47(5): p. 1155-1170.
Jeppson, P.C., et al., Recommended standardized terminology of the anterior female pelvis based on a structured medical literature review. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018. 219(1): p. 26-39.
el-Sayed, R.F., et al., Anatomy of the urethral supporting ligaments defined by dissection, histology, and MRI of female cadavers and MRI of healthy nulliparous women. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007. 189(5): p. 1145-57.
Herschorn, S., Female pelvic floor anatomy: the pelvic floor, supporting structures, and pelvic organs. Rev Urol, 2004. 6 Suppl 5: p. S2-s10.
Huddleston, H.T., et al., Magnetic resonance imaging of defects in DeLancey’s vaginal support levels I, II, and III. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995. 172(6): p. 1778-82; discussion 1782-4.
El Sayed, R.F., et al., Pelvic floor dysfunction: assessment with combined analysis of static and dynamic MR imaging findings. Radiology, 2008. 248(2): p. 518-30.
Khatri, G., A.D. de Leon, and M.E. Lockhart, MR Imaging of the Pelvic Floor. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2017. 25(3): p. 457-480.
Richardson, A.C., The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 1993. 36(4): p. 976-83.
DeLancey, J.O., Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999. 180(4): p. 815-23.
Gilpin, S.A., et al., The pathogenesis of genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine. A histological and histochemical study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1989. 96(1): p. 15-23.
Strohbehn, K., Normal pelvic floor anatomy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 1998. 25(4): p. 683-705.
Stein, T.A. and J.O. DeLancey, Structure of the perineal membrane in females: gross and microscopic anatomy. Obstet Gynecol, 2008. 111(3): p. 686-93.
Solan, P. and B. Davis, Anorectal anatomy and imaging techniques. Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2013. 42(4): p. 701-12
Terra, M.P., et al., MRI in evaluating atrophy of the external anal sphincter in patients with fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2006. 187(4): p. 991-9.
Broekhuis, S.R., et al., A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2009. 20(6): p. 721-9.
Singh, K., W.M. Reid, and L.A. Berger, Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2001. 185(1): p. 71-7.
Fielding, J.R., et al., MR-based three-dimensional modeling of the normal pelvic floor in women: quantification of muscle mass. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2000. 174(3): p. 657-60.
Khatri, G., et al., Postoperative Imaging after Surgical Repair for Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. Radiographics, 2016. 36(4): p. 1233-56.
Viragh, K.A., et al., Translabial US: Preoperative Detection of Midurethral Sling Erosion in Stress Urinary Incontinence. Radiology, 2018. 289(3): p. 721-727.
Abdool, Z., A.H. Sultan, and R. Thakar, Ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter complex: a review. Br J Radiol, 2012. 85(1015): p. 865-75.
Schaer, G.N., et al., Intraurethral ultrasound correlated with urethral histology. Obstet Gynecol, 1998. 91(1): p. 60-4.
Dietz, H.P., et al., Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of avulsion of the puborectalis muscle by tomographic ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J, 2011. 22(6): p. 699-704.
Oversand, S.H., et al., Levator ani defects and the severity of symptoms in women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J, 2018. 29(1): p. 63-69.
Elsayed, R.F., Overview of the posterior compartment. In: Shaaban, A.M. (ed). Diagnostic Imaging: Gynecology, 2nd ed. Elsevier-Amirsys, 2015. p. 8/88–8/101.
Elsayed, R.F., Overview of the pelvic floor. In: Shaaban, A.M. (ed). Diagnostic Imaging: Gynecology, 2nd ed. Elsevier-Amirsys, 2015. p. 8/2–8/29.